Author Topic: Report: Schroder Signs With Celts  (Read 35889 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #60 on: August 09, 2021, 09:49:53 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63484
  • Tommy Points: -25458
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Quote
No other teammate of Lebron's is really considered a plus ball handler and certainly none of them can pass like Westbrook

Wade was a very good ball handler.  I suspect if he hunted triple doubles like Westbrook he could have put up similar stats.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #61 on: August 09, 2021, 09:52:08 PM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34871
  • Tommy Points: 1610
Quote
No other teammate of Lebron's is really considered a plus ball handler and certainly none of them can pass like Westbrook

Wade was a very good ball handler.  I suspect if he hunted triple doubles like Westbrook he could have put up similar stats.
Wade was very good for a SG, but not anywhere close to what a solid PG can provide. 
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #62 on: August 09, 2021, 11:43:32 PM »

Offline jay

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1359
  • Tommy Points: 51
Quote
  It makes no sense to me to bring in Schroder unless we have a plan to trade Smart (hopefully for a good young PF).
Report to moderator

Just because I like to daydream about this stuff…

Sign Schroder.  On January 15, trade Smart + Timelord + Romeo + picks for John Collins.

How good would this core be long-term?

Collins
Tatum
Brown
Nesmith
Schroder / Pritchard
I'd rather take a flyer on someone like Bagley.  Bagley for Smart works financially.

Could we move Jabari, Dunn, and Fernando for Bagley?  Seems like they are trying to give him away.  Then still sign Schröder to MLE?

Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #63 on: August 10, 2021, 02:32:27 AM »

Offline trickybilly

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5861
  • Tommy Points: 643
Quote
  It makes no sense to me to bring in Schroder unless we have a plan to trade Smart (hopefully for a good young PF).
Report to moderator

Just because I like to daydream about this stuff…

Sign Schroder.  On January 15, trade Smart + Timelord + Romeo + picks for John Collins.

How good would this core be long-term?

Collins
Tatum
Brown
Nesmith
Schroder / Pritchard
I'd rather take a flyer on someone like Bagley.  Bagley for Smart works financially.

Could we move Jabari, Dunn, and Fernando for Bagley?  Seems like they are trying to give him away.  Then still sign Schröder to MLE?

Where did you hear they are trying to give away Bagley?
"Gimme the ball, gimme the ball". Freddy Quimby, 1994.

Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #64 on: August 10, 2021, 02:57:26 AM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
Quote
  It makes no sense to me to bring in Schroder unless we have a plan to trade Smart (hopefully for a good young PF).
Report to moderator

Just because I like to daydream about this stuff…

Sign Schroder.  On January 15, trade Smart + Timelord + Romeo + picks for John Collins.

How good would this core be long-term?

Collins
Tatum
Brown
Nesmith
Schroder / Pritchard
I'd rather take a flyer on someone like Bagley.  Bagley for Smart works financially.

Could we move Jabari, Dunn, and Fernando for Bagley?  Seems like they are trying to give him away.  Then still sign Schröder to MLE?

Where did you hear they are trying to give away Bagley?
It's a good question. Have heard plenty about Bagley wanting out - little about Sacramento being desperate to dump him.
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #65 on: August 10, 2021, 08:31:14 AM »

Offline jay

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1359
  • Tommy Points: 51

Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #66 on: August 10, 2021, 08:36:33 AM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34871
  • Tommy Points: 1610
This was one mention:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/seandeveney/2021/07/30/another-failed-trade-keeps-sacramento-kings-future-cloudy/
I think they used give away in not the same manner you are using it.  Bagley and Hield are absolutely on the block, but they aren't just going to dump them for nothing, which is why they are both still in Sacramento.  They want value for them and aren't going to trade them for basically a bucket of basketballs.
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #67 on: August 10, 2021, 12:08:03 PM »

Offline jay

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1359
  • Tommy Points: 51
Probably so.  Also the fact that he or his dad were on twitter wanting out, Fox’s dad tweeting at Bagley dad, seemed like they really want to move him.  Maybe Dunn and filler not enough though.

Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #68 on: August 10, 2021, 12:40:46 PM »

Offline BruceBanner18

  • NCE
  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 535
  • Tommy Points: 73
Quote
  It makes no sense to me to bring in Schroder unless we have a plan to trade Smart (hopefully for a good young PF).
Report to moderator

Just because I like to daydream about this stuff…

Sign Schroder.  On January 15, trade Smart + Timelord + Romeo + picks for John Collins.

How good would this core be long-term?

Collins
Tatum
Brown
Nesmith
Schroder / Pritchard
I'd rather take a flyer on someone like Bagley.  Bagley for Smart works financially.

Could we move Jabari, Dunn, and Fernando for Bagley?  Seems like they are trying to give him away.  Then still sign Schröder to MLE?
Speaking of young underperforming PFs what is happening with Markkanen. Can we low-ball our way into a rotation ready stretch 4?

Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #69 on: August 10, 2021, 12:51:31 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13790
  • Tommy Points: 2062
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
Speaking of young underperforming PFs what is happening with Markkanen. Can we low-ball our way into a rotation ready stretch 4?

There is this from Bleacher Report:

Quote
[Fischer] Dallas, New Orleans, Boston, and Minnesota have all shown interest in signing Markkanen to deals worth around $15 million in average annual value, sources said, but the Bulls are seeking a first-round pick in exchange for helping facilitate the transaction.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2947075-inside-chicago-bulls-85-million-demar-derozan-deal-and-markkanen-freeze-out

Not sure I want Markkanen at $15M/yr, but interesting that the Cs were mentioned. Also, at the end of the article (and since this is a Schroder thread), there was this...whatever it means:

Quote
The Celtics are exploring trade opportunities for point guard Kris Dunn and forward Bruno Fernando before concluding conversations with free agent Dennis Schroder.


Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #70 on: August 10, 2021, 12:58:49 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63484
  • Tommy Points: -25458
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Speaking of young underperforming PFs what is happening with Markkanen. Can we low-ball our way into a rotation ready stretch 4?

There is this from Bleacher Report:

Quote
[Fischer] Dallas, New Orleans, Boston, and Minnesota have all shown interest in signing Markkanen to deals worth around $15 million in average annual value, sources said, but the Bulls are seeking a first-round pick in exchange for helping facilitate the transaction.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2947075-inside-chicago-bulls-85-million-demar-derozan-deal-and-markkanen-freeze-out

Not sure I want Markkanen at $15M/yr, but interesting that the Cs were mentioned. Also, at the end of the article (and since this is a Schroder thread), there was this...whatever it means:

Quote
The Celtics are exploring trade opportunities for point guard Kris Dunn and forward Bruno Fernando before concluding conversations with free agent Dennis Schroder.

I’m skeptical of that report.  We’d presumably need to trade Smart.

I guess we can go crazy and sign both Schroder and Markannen.

Horford / Timelord / Kanter
Markannen / (Tatum) / Parker
Tatum / Nesmith
Brown / Richardson / Romeo
Schroder/ Pritchard

Upside?



I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #71 on: August 10, 2021, 01:06:00 PM »

Offline michigan adam

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 252
  • Tommy Points: 19
Speaking of young underperforming PFs what is happening with Markkanen. Can we low-ball our way into a rotation ready stretch 4?

There is this from Bleacher Report:

Quote
[Fischer] Dallas, New Orleans, Boston, and Minnesota have all shown interest in signing Markkanen to deals worth around $15 million in average annual value, sources said, but the Bulls are seeking a first-round pick in exchange for helping facilitate the transaction.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2947075-inside-chicago-bulls-85-million-demar-derozan-deal-and-markkanen-freeze-out

Not sure I want Markkanen at $15M/yr, but interesting that the Cs were mentioned. Also, at the end of the article (and since this is a Schroder thread), there was this...whatever it means:

Quote
The Celtics are exploring trade opportunities for point guard Kris Dunn and forward Bruno Fernando before concluding conversations with free agent Dennis Schroder.

I’m skeptical of that report.  We’d presumably need to trade Smart.

I guess we can go crazy and sign both Schroder and Markannen.

Horford / Timelord / Kanter
Markannen / (Tatum) / Parker
Tatum / Nesmith
Brown / Richardson / Romeo
Schroder/ Pritchard

Upside?

That is a contender in my book...

Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #72 on: August 10, 2021, 01:22:36 PM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13985
  • Tommy Points: 1037
I guess we can go crazy and sign both Schroder and Markannen.

Horford / Timelord / Kanter
Markannen / (Tatum) / Parker
Tatum / Nesmith
Brown / Richardson / Romeo
Schroder/ Pritchard

Upside?
I could see something like that.  You are essentially getting Schroder and Markkanen for what, Smart and Dunn?  Maybe add a future first for Chicago (protected).  Chicago does not really want more salary but I don't see how else we could take on Markkanen at $15M.  I would then see the team more like this:

Schroder/Pritchard/Madar
Brown/Richardson/Edwards
Tatum/Nesmith/Langford
Markkanen/Parker/GWill
Horford/RWill/Kanter

The key to this is what you believe you are getting in Markkanen.  Is it the 40% 3PT shooter who can give you 19/9 like he did in 2018 as a starter or is he the player who couldn't keep his starting role in CHI in 2020?   I can't say that I know what Markkanen is going to be but love the potential for what he could be.  He could be a really nice big to play alongside Tatum and Brown.  Big risk to give up Smart but if you like Schroder, you got that covered.

Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #73 on: August 10, 2021, 01:27:45 PM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8005
  • Tommy Points: 1037
Speaking of young underperforming PFs what is happening with Markkanen. Can we low-ball our way into a rotation ready stretch 4?

There is this from Bleacher Report:

Quote
[Fischer] Dallas, New Orleans, Boston, and Minnesota have all shown interest in signing Markkanen to deals worth around $15 million in average annual value, sources said, but the Bulls are seeking a first-round pick in exchange for helping facilitate the transaction.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2947075-inside-chicago-bulls-85-million-demar-derozan-deal-and-markkanen-freeze-out

Not sure I want Markkanen at $15M/yr, but interesting that the Cs were mentioned. Also, at the end of the article (and since this is a Schroder thread), there was this...whatever it means:

Quote
The Celtics are exploring trade opportunities for point guard Kris Dunn and forward Bruno Fernando before concluding conversations with free agent Dennis Schroder.

I’m skeptical of that report.  We’d presumably need to trade Smart.

I guess we can go crazy and sign both Schroder and Markannen.

Horford / Timelord / Kanter
Markannen / (Tatum) / Parker
Tatum / Nesmith
Brown / Richardson / Romeo
Schroder/ Pritchard

Upside?

Richardson would work in a Markkanen S&T instead of Smart.  It would keep us below the hard cap (although subject us to it), and year one of Markkanen could start at $14.6 million, certainly getting him above $15 million for an average annual value on a 3-4 year deal with raises.

I don’t see us doing it, but perhaps I’m biased in that I don’t think Markkanen is worth $15 million a year.

Re: Schroder Thought
« Reply #74 on: August 10, 2021, 01:39:13 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63484
  • Tommy Points: -25458
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Speaking of young underperforming PFs what is happening with Markkanen. Can we low-ball our way into a rotation ready stretch 4?

There is this from Bleacher Report:

Quote
[Fischer] Dallas, New Orleans, Boston, and Minnesota have all shown interest in signing Markkanen to deals worth around $15 million in average annual value, sources said, but the Bulls are seeking a first-round pick in exchange for helping facilitate the transaction.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2947075-inside-chicago-bulls-85-million-demar-derozan-deal-and-markkanen-freeze-out

Not sure I want Markkanen at $15M/yr, but interesting that the Cs were mentioned. Also, at the end of the article (and since this is a Schroder thread), there was this...whatever it means:

Quote
The Celtics are exploring trade opportunities for point guard Kris Dunn and forward Bruno Fernando before concluding conversations with free agent Dennis Schroder.

I’m skeptical of that report.  We’d presumably need to trade Smart.

I guess we can go crazy and sign both Schroder and Markannen.

Horford / Timelord / Kanter
Markannen / (Tatum) / Parker
Tatum / Nesmith
Brown / Richardson / Romeo
Schroder/ Pritchard

Upside?

Richardson would work in a Markkanen S&T instead of Smart.  It would keep us below the hard cap (although subject us to it), and year one of Markkanen could start at $14.6 million, certainly getting him above $15 million for an average annual value on a 3-4 year deal with raises.

I don’t see us doing it, but perhaps I’m biased in that I don’t think Markkanen is worth $15 million a year.

Could we do the following?

1.  Sign and trade for Markannen. We send out Smart,
and Dunn, most likely to a third-party who sends Minny a first rounder.

2.  Sign and trade Schroder into our TPE, giving the Lakers a trade exception.

3.  Bring over YAM and sign him to a four year deal using our MLE.

4.  Cut Parker for cap reasons if necessary.

Is it possible to do that under the hard cap?

That puts us at:

Horford / Timelord / Kanter
Markannen / (Tatum) / Williams
Tatum / Nesmith
Brown / Richardson / Romeo / Edwards
Schroder/ Pritchard / YAM

Tell Brad that I will accept a paid internship in the front office.  I will settle for low six figures, a housing allowance, and private school for my kids.

« Last Edit: August 10, 2021, 01:47:24 PM by Roy H. »


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!