I'm saying yes....though it may require a few months of the season to see it (for Nesmith and Pritchard to get the schemes right so they can come in and contribute comfortably)
We acquired what we were missing from last year. Losing Hayward (if it's for nothing) hurts temporarily...but the new draftees over time more than make up for it...due to Tatum Hayward overlapping (Tatum's improvement in distribution).
As good as Hayward is at distributing, he also has the ball more than the Celtics need...to replace this we added a guy who will not have the ball in his hands, but will shoot it much better than Hayward.
That's an improvement (over time).
I've seen How good Hayward can be. He can be awesome. That is something to miss and that is why Danny shouldn't settle in this deal with Indiana. But, Tatum/Brown just need to be and are ready to be the focus and have the ball. I would still love Hayward off the bench for the next three years is he ends up back in Boston. That would be GREAT! But, not if he'll be unhappy, and not if Nesmith is ready for big minutes sooner rather than later. In that case better if Gordon heads to Indy.
Agree with some others that target #1 should be Baynes. I mean, if Turner comes then no, too many centers...but I liked the concept of Dipo plus Holiday then sign Baynes...even if we need to add a pick.
Then Pritchard verses Wannamaker. I think it's an upgrade despite defense better from Wannamaker.
Pritchard with ball handling, pushing the tempo, shooting, etc..will add a needed dimension to backup PG spot. Wannamaker did ok, but when he was in it felt like it was to rest someone. Pritchard will oft make us wonder if he should come out of the game imo...a very different feeling.
My answer of yes definitely was influenced by:
1. amount of time Hayward missed, and
2. predicting decent moves to finish off the off-season.