« Reply #333 on: November 30, 2020, 12:32:07 PM »
Knew it’d be Kawhi. Last of the two-way forces of that calibre remaining. Can shoot from 3 levels, plays elite defence, rebounds, is an improved passer and is clutch. Good pick
I rate his 2020 season very highly - his jump as a passer really impressed me, he definitely jumped into the upper echelon of MVP candidates with his improvements last season (think LeBron/Curry/Durant/Giannis/AD).
Yeah, me too. He also showed up in the playoffs, despite most of his team hanging him out to dry. Plus, he’s a fun guy 
except the 4th quarter of the Denver series. In that Kawhi failed miserably, which is why I would select his Toronto season and not his Clippers one.
4th quarter stats against Nuggets
Game 7 - 0-5, -12
Game 6 - 3-7, -10
Game 5 - 3-7, -11
Game 4 - 2-4, +0
Game 3 - 1-7, +8
Game 2 - 0-3, +1
Game 1 - did not play
So in the 4th quarter of a series they lost in 7 after blowing massive 2nd half leads in the final 3 games, Kawhi was 9 of 33 or 27.3% and his team was -24 with him on the floor in those 4th quarters.
Kawhi may have been better in the regular season with the Clippers than he was with the Raptors, but he was a monster for the Raptors in the playoffs and he didn't show up at all in the most meaningful time for the Clippers in a series they lost. I'd absolutely choose the Raptors season for him. He was just better.
He definitely wasn't better in Toronto, this is winning bias at its finest. Cherrypicking a select quarter of a random series with stats that only capture one aspect of the game (won't even get into raw +/-, stuff like that in a 7 game sample size is utterly useless) doesn't even come close to being strong evidence for him "utterly failing when it mattered the most", for all we know he could've created a bunch of open looks for his teammates with his offensive gravity and still graded out as a massive positive for the Clippers offensively in the fourth quarter of the series.
I was specifically commenting on gouki's point that he showed up in the playoffs and his teammates left him out to dry. That is not someone that showed up when it mattered. He shot 27.3% on 5.5 shot attempts in the 4th quarter of a series they lost.
For context against Dallas in the 4th quarter of the 6 games Lebron was 7 of 20 or 35% though took 2 less shots per game. And that is considered one of the worst playoff melt downs ever (and many would call it the worst ever). Kawhi was awful in the 4th quarter against the Nuggets. There is no other way around it. He just didn't show up throughout the 4th quarter that series. It happens to great players, but it also isn't really all that arguable. And for the record, Paul George had a better TS% than Kawhi did in that series, and George is getting crushed for being so bad and yet he was more efficient than Kawhi.
You are certainly free to choose whatever season you want, but there is no way I'd choose LA over Toronto. In Toronto, Kawhi was a monster for basically 4 playoff rounds (the final 3 rounds against the Sixers, Bucks, and Warriors he was basically a 30/10/4 player). He stepped up and defended Giannis better than anyone had, he brought it on both ends of the floor, and he wasn't fully healthy. That just isn't what happened in LA. Kawhi failed the Clippers last year. It happens from time to time from great players and shouldn't diminish the other seasons or accolades, but I just can't get past how bad Kawhi played when his team needed him the most and if you choose that season it will be there lingering. You choose the Finals MVP season when he was a monster, you eliminate much of that lingering questions and then really only have to defend him missing 25% of his teams games (which you'd have to do if you chose LA anyway).
That 30/10/4 is deceptive - his assist numbers didn't capture his mediocre passing ability that season while his 28/10/6 this season doesn't entirely capture his improvement in that department either, the improved quality of his passes made his assists this season more valuable than the ones he threw last season (a quick look at the tape would immediately show you the difference, Toronto Kawhi was struggling to make the reads that he was consistently nailing in LA).
And sure, Kawhi lost a few efficiency points on lower volume this season, but is this a true qualitative decline in his scoring or just poor shooting luck for a few games? His body of work in the RS would suggest that he's still pretty much the same scorer when his results in prior years suggest that his scoring is inelastic against strong playoff defences, so I simply wouldn't put much stock into a small decline and a cherry-picked sample suggesting that his scoring has somehow collapsed, it's not like he had an absolute stinker of a playoffs in 2020.
Again, I was commenting on the point that he showed up and his teammate let him down. That just isn't true. I wasn't making a broader point that he deteriorated overall or anything. I fully expect him to play very well again next year. He is a great player, but sometimes great players just don't have very good series. I'm surprised anyone would really argue that Kawhi was great against the Nuggets. He wasn't. He played very poorly down the stretch of the games in that series. I think some of that is what he wasn't used to playing big minutes and every game (this is also a knock for Giannis). His conditioning just wasn't very good (and that seemed to be a team problem, not just him). I think we are going to see this more and more as more and more guys load manage, not just by taking games off, but also cutting minutes down. It is hard to all of a sudden ramp up for 20 playoff games and do something you hadn't done all season long. That is one of the reason I prefer the older players in these sort of drafts. They played 80+ games and 36+ minutes pretty consistently. That is a real benefit when you are putting together teams like this.

Logged
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick
Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip