Author Topic: Romeo Langford(merged threads)  (Read 126690 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #465 on: December 20, 2019, 05:16:07 AM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8894
  • Tommy Points: 290
he ll be ok



So, if he ends up putting up Evan Turner numbers (Boston numbers, where he was arguably at his best), would we be thinking that is a reasonable output for a person drafted from that spot? (FWIW I think Turner was a very useful cog in his time here....the angst about him stems mostly from the spot he was drafted, which is fair enough).
Romeo would be worse than Turner if he produced similar box stats, Turner's size and length (6'7, long arms) gave us significant defensive value, I don't think Romeo can provide us that as a 6'4 guard/wing. But yeah it'd be reasonable output from the 14th pick, these picks usually go boom or bust with the in betweens being cheap role players. What I'd be happy with is 17-20 points per 75 possessions on above league average efficiency as a secondary/tertiary creator with decent playmaking chops and the ability to warp defences with the threat to score lol :laugh:
Turner is 6'6 if you round up. Langford is 6'5 if you round up. That's both without shoes. Turner is a good comp the similar offense and questionable effort on defense game to game (career wise).

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #466 on: December 20, 2019, 06:11:34 AM »

Offline MaxAMillion

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 458
  • Tommy Points: 16
Should have taken Brandon Clarke....but DA had to overthink it.

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #467 on: December 20, 2019, 07:31:10 AM »

Offline Birdman

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10329
  • Tommy Points: 465
Should have taken Brandon Clarke....but DA had to overthink it.
Clarke is not a guard or under 6-6..Ainge loves those guards! Someone needs to tell him that u need a center
C/PF-Horford, Baynes, Noel, Theis, Morris,
SF/SG- Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Smart, Semi, Clark
PG- Irving, Rozier, Larkin

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #468 on: December 20, 2019, 07:59:58 AM »

Online A Future of Stevens

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2803
  • Tommy Points: 526
Should have taken Brandon Clarke....but DA had to overthink it.
Clarke is not a guard or under 6-6..Ainge loves those guards! Someone needs to tell him that u need a center

Interestingly enough because of his T rex arms, Clarke is pretty close to Romeo in standing reach even though he is a few inches taller. At the combine Clarke was measured at a 8'6 standing reach. Romeo's standing reach is listed at anywhere from 8'6 to 8'7 (combine measurement.) Granted Romeo plays much more similar to a guard and Clarke plays like a big, but lumping Clarke in with centers is humorous* giving his tiny size. You could actually make the case Clarke is the most "Ainge" big in the draft in a while.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2019, 08:07:46 AM by A Future of Stevens »
#JKJB

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #469 on: December 20, 2019, 08:29:16 AM »

Offline Rikibellevie

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 645
  • Tommy Points: 282
Good to see him having a little playing time.

He was the good choice right now in Danny Ainge perspective I guess. As the team isn't build to contend this year, Danny took the choice of potential before to think about a moore finished player as B Clarke or Thybulle or a player who enter -the alreaddy feeded in number- rotation into our weak post, a guy as Bitadze.

Langford as very good skills unpolished for a 14* like his touch and steps into the rim, his quickness and laterality. He has to work a lot but if he isn't regulary injury prone (the Reason he was 14 but we Don't know how his body will go) and make progress his shoot correctly (he could create good spots half way), he can be a good pick. Especially if in 2 years if we have Tatum, Brown, Smart at top and Walker, Hayward (?) still a their prime… He could be a good factor X from the Bench, some 6 men profile… We will see. Thybulle appears as a better pick now but we will see… Maybe the tea future need more of a scorer/facilitator from the bench than a defensive tiger that we allready have.

He may be a bust bu to me he is a godd pick right now because the expectetions were not higher.

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #470 on: December 20, 2019, 08:37:13 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20131
  • Tommy Points: 1333
Quote
Clarke is not a guard or under 6-6..Ainge loves those guards! Someone needs to tell him that u need a center

I wish we took him instead of Grant...

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #471 on: December 20, 2019, 09:16:45 AM »

Online slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32345
  • Tommy Points: 10099
Quote
Clarke is not a guard or under 6-6..Ainge loves those guards! Someone needs to tell him that u need a center

I wish we took him instead of Grant...
not really possible since we sent out the pick where Clarke was still available to Philly so they could get Thybulle.  We got Edwards and Waters for that exchange. 

if we're going to be playing Monday morning quarterback with Danny's picks this year after less than 2 months of the season played and limiting the second guessing to the slots where Danny actually picked (or traded back for --> no expectations that combining picks/assets to move up for players like Hachimura or Herro were possible),  I'm ok with Romeo at 14 considering who else was available there. 

I have to admit that after seeing Thybulle play with Edwards struggling in regular season and Waters not getting time that I think Danny should have kept Thybulle.  He's looking like another Marcus Smart on defense already.  I think in the end, Edwards will find his shot more reliably and Waters will step in for Wanamaker next year so their combined value could equal or exceed Thybulle's in a couple of years and hopefully over their respective careers.

at 22, I'm fine with Grant since Clarke was off the board.  High BBIQ and decent defender so far.  once he starts hitting his shots regularly (tired of just seeing him either camping out for a 3 or getting rejected under the rim) he's going to be a real asset off the bench.

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #472 on: December 20, 2019, 10:39:59 AM »

Offline wiley

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4855
  • Tommy Points: 386
Quote
Clarke is not a guard or under 6-6..Ainge loves those guards! Someone needs to tell him that u need a center

I wish we took him instead of Grant...
not really possible since we sent out the pick where Clarke was still available to Philly so they could get Thybulle.  We got Edwards and Waters for that exchange. 

if we're going to be playing Monday morning quarterback with Danny's picks this year after less than 2 months of the season played and limiting the second guessing to the slots where Danny actually picked (or traded back for --> no expectations that combining picks/assets to move up for players like Hachimura or Herro were possible),  I'm ok with Romeo at 14 considering who else was available there. 

I have to admit that after seeing Thybulle play with Edwards struggling in regular season and Waters not getting time that I think Danny should have kept Thybulle.  He's looking like another Marcus Smart on defense already.  I think in the end, Edwards will find his shot more reliably and Waters will step in for Wanamaker next year so their combined value could equal or exceed Thybulle's in a couple of years and hopefully over their respective careers.

at 22, I'm fine with Grant since Clarke was off the board.  High BBIQ and decent defender so far.  once he starts hitting his shots regularly (tired of just seeing him either camping out for a 3 or getting rejected under the rim) he's going to be a real asset off the bench.

Are you sure Waters came with the trade?  I thought just Edwards, and the pick (24?) that helped net the Bucks first this year.   

In Hindsight...B. Clarke at 14 currently seems like a great alternative....and imagining that Danny still did the later trade, who would Danny have picked instead of Grant W. if he felt GWill was redundant with Clarke.  Would Romeo still have been on the board?  I guess not.  Who else was there? 

If he hadn't done the trade that landed Edwards and helped land the Bucks pick...then yes, I too in hindsight would have loved to get Thybulle (binky) and Clarke (I wasn't sure).

If you're right that Waters was also part of the trade....extra kudos to Danny.  Rooting for Romeo to come along at some point.  If Grant's offense kicks into gear (especially his 3), that pick will look better and better....

EDIT:  I wouldn't mind both Clarke and GWill on the team.  Very different players...insurance against injury to our bigs...both high IQ guys...
« Last Edit: December 20, 2019, 11:29:14 AM by wiley »

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #473 on: December 20, 2019, 10:55:49 AM »

Offline rollie mass

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4270
  • Tommy Points: 1233
Romeo has a 6-11 wingspan and a good NBA frame. He is just turned 20 and missed summer league and pre season. The kid needs a year in weight room ,a year with a shooting coach and a year for game to slow down..
Also getting to rim a strength but this is now NBA .
He is the first guard that is not undersized and his wingspan should help on defence on perimeter, in passing lanes and closeouts.
Nobody should ever compare this kid to James Young .

Injury prone not likely Also playing injured all season Ohio State delaying operation and rehab. Then sustaining a groin pull after missing summer league and much of time leading to pre season and has to jump in and push his body in drills against grown men. Then to slip on wet patch and later sprain an ankle stepping on someone's foot..Just rookie bad luck.

« Last Edit: December 20, 2019, 11:18:30 AM by rollie mass »

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #474 on: December 20, 2019, 10:10:55 PM »

Offline Emmette Bryant

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1491
  • Tommy Points: 289
Nice night for Romeo. 3 of 5 from the field, 6 points, 2 steals, 1 TO.

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #475 on: December 20, 2019, 10:28:25 PM »

Online slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32345
  • Tommy Points: 10099
Quote
Clarke is not a guard or under 6-6..Ainge loves those guards! Someone needs to tell him that u need a center

I wish we took him instead of Grant...
not really possible since we sent out the pick where Clarke was still available to Philly so they could get Thybulle.  We got Edwards and Waters for that exchange. 

if we're going to be playing Monday morning quarterback with Danny's picks this year after less than 2 months of the season played and limiting the second guessing to the slots where Danny actually picked (or traded back for --> no expectations that combining picks/assets to move up for players like Hachimura or Herro were possible),  I'm ok with Romeo at 14 considering who else was available there. 

I have to admit that after seeing Thybulle play with Edwards struggling in regular season and Waters not getting time that I think Danny should have kept Thybulle.  He's looking like another Marcus Smart on defense already.  I think in the end, Edwards will find his shot more reliably and Waters will step in for Wanamaker next year so their combined value could equal or exceed Thybulle's in a couple of years and hopefully over their respective careers.

at 22, I'm fine with Grant since Clarke was off the board.  High BBIQ and decent defender so far.  once he starts hitting his shots regularly (tired of just seeing him either camping out for a 3 or getting rejected under the rim) he's going to be a real asset off the bench.

Are you sure Waters came with the trade?  I thought just Edwards, and the pick (24?) that helped net the Bucks first this year.   

In Hindsight...B. Clarke at 14 currently seems like a great alternative....and imagining that Danny still did the later trade, who would Danny have picked instead of Grant W. if he felt GWill was redundant with Clarke.  Would Romeo still have been on the board?  I guess not.  Who else was there? 

If he hadn't done the trade that landed Edwards and helped land the Bucks pick...then yes, I too in hindsight would have loved to get Thybulle (binky) and Clarke (I wasn't sure).

If you're right that Waters was also part of the trade....extra kudos to Danny.  Rooting for Romeo to come along at some point.  If Grant's offense kicks into gear (especially his 3), that pick will look better and better....

EDIT:  I wouldn't mind both Clarke and GWill on the team.  Very different players...insurance against injury to our bigs...both high IQ guys...
TP - you're right.  Waters wasn't part of the deal.  extra asset the C's got is now the Bucks first rounder

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #476 on: December 20, 2019, 10:41:48 PM »

Offline Fierce1

  • NGT
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2630
  • Tommy Points: 121
Nice night for Romeo. 3 of 5 from the field, 6 points, 2 steals, 1 TO.

From what I saw, Romeo is a slasher.

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #477 on: December 20, 2019, 10:56:09 PM »

Offline Sophomore

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6227
  • Tommy Points: 823
Nice night for Romeo. 3 of 5 from the field, 6 points, 2 steals, 1 TO.

From what I saw, Romeo is a slasher.

With a little more though, right? Got into the lane, put his defender on his back, changed pace and then lifted a couple of nice floaters. Like a smoother, longer Marcus on that end - but he’s only 20.

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #478 on: December 20, 2019, 11:01:44 PM »

Offline keevsnick

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6712
  • Tommy Points: 652
Nice night for Romeo. 3 of 5 from the field, 6 points, 2 steals, 1 TO.

From what I saw, Romeo is a slasher.

With a little more though, right? Got into the lane, put his defender on his back, changed pace and then lifted a couple of nice floaters. Like a smoother, longer Marcus on that end - but he’s only 20.

Its obvious he has some on ball skills. Could totally see him giving this team some nice offensive bench punch as soon as later this year or failing that next year. Seems decent on defense as well, longer arms then you'd guess by his height.

Re: Romeo Langford thread(merged threads)
« Reply #479 on: December 20, 2019, 11:10:45 PM »

Offline Fierce1

  • NGT
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2630
  • Tommy Points: 121
Nice night for Romeo. 3 of 5 from the field, 6 points, 2 steals, 1 TO.

From what I saw, Romeo is a slasher.

With a little more though, right? Got into the lane, put his defender on his back, changed pace and then lifted a couple of nice floaters. Like a smoother, longer Marcus on that end - but he’s only 20.

No doubt Romeo can score, he's always been a scorer since high school.

What I think he needs to improve is his 3-point shooting.