Many people on this board: "It'S oKaY tHaT sMaRt Is OuT fOr ThE fIrSt RoUnD dUe To A dUmB dEcIsIoN tO pLaY hIm In A mEaNiNgLeSs GaMe! We'Ll HaNdLe InDy WiThOuT hIm!" We should still win this series, but people thinking this would be a cakewalk without Smart are crazy.
We clearly are struggling without that secondary playmaker out there in Smart. It might be time to start Hayward over Tatum, as he can provide you with Tatum's scoring while also providing the passing and playmaking to allow Kyrie to play off the ball, which neither Brown nor Tatum can provide you. And I prefer Brown at the 2 rather than going big with one of Tatum or Hayward there, as I don't think they are quick enough to guard as 2's.
Yes, that's what everyone that disagrees with you is thinking. Everyone that doesn't think you should sit everyone for the last two games is actually thrilled that Smart got injured, we love seeing guys not play
I mean, what? lol
First, no, literally - not figuratively, literally - many people on here were saying just this thing. It's not me speculating; this is literally what people here were saying, i.e. that Smart is not a big loss for this series due to it being Indy and us still having more overall talent.
Second, again, this is another fallacy - specifically a strawman this time - to say that I think that people are "actually thrilled that Smart got injured." That's asinine. I certainly don't think that. I just think that people are clearly wrong based on rationalizations that they are creating in order to protect Brad.