Author Topic: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier  (Read 12825 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« on: March 30, 2019, 09:17:13 PM »

Offline Chris22

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5081
  • Tommy Points: 460
Wannamaker is still a better backup point guard than Rozier.

Better passer and a better shooter.

Rozier dribbles around like he is lost.

Re: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2019, 09:25:23 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
Someone should let Brad know
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2019, 09:42:09 PM »

Offline apc

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4310
  • Tommy Points: 437
BS is saving Wanamaker for playoffs, he is our joker.

Re: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2019, 09:48:23 PM »

Offline RodyTur10

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2827
  • Tommy Points: 298
  • Always offline from 9pm till 1am
BS is saving Wanamaker for playoffs, he is our joker.

Every year we have some surprising players that step up during the playoffs.

We've had Jerebko, Green, Rozier, Brown.

Now it's time for Wanamaker and Theis!

Re: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2019, 09:54:17 PM »

Online smokeablount

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3239
  • Tommy Points: 645
  • Mark Blount often got smoked
Just like I said in 2018.

And before the year that Hayward shouldn’t be starting.

And before the year that we needed to give RW minutes to develop him because we need him to be better than Theis is.

And before the year that Baynes should start.

But I must be wrong or just plain crazy, because my knowledge is merely .000000001% of the raw unbridled genius of Brad Stevens and Co. We can’t question anything, because, I mean, the Pacers have lost 7 of 8 and only a Da Vinci like Brad could manage to not pass them in that span of time. Maybe he’s just not giving his all, because he’s about to simultaneously end climate change and cure all forms of cancer right before the playoffs start. Then we’ll go 16-0.

BOOK IT.
CsBlog 05-25 Fantasy Draft Commish, OKC:

PG: SGA (24-25, MVP, 32 MPG)
SG: Kevin Durant (13-14, MVP, 39 MPG)
SF: ?
PF: ?
C: ?

Re: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2019, 11:21:01 AM »

Offline Chris22

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5081
  • Tommy Points: 460
Just like I said in 2018.

And before the year that Hayward shouldn’t be starting.

And before the year that we needed to give RW minutes to develop him because we need him to be better than Theis is.

And before the year that Baynes should start.

But I must be wrong or just plain crazy, because my knowledge is merely .000000001% of the raw unbridled genius of Brad Stevens and Co. We can’t question anything, because, I mean, the Pacers have lost 7 of 8 and only a Da Vinci like Brad could manage to not pass them in that span of time. Maybe he’s just not giving his all, because he’s about to simultaneously end climate change and cure all forms of cancer right before the playoffs start. Then we’ll go 16-0.

BOOK IT.

Everything you said was true.

Brad has to play Rozier because he makes more money than Wanamaker. It's the NBA.

It is fun though to see a backup point guard making excellent decisions and passes for a change.

Re: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2019, 11:46:27 AM »

Offline ederson

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2896
  • Tommy Points: 279
Just like I said in 2018.

And before the year that Hayward shouldn’t be starting.

And before the year that we needed to give RW minutes to develop him because we need him to be better than Theis is.

And before the year that Baynes should start.

But I must be wrong or just plain crazy, because my knowledge is merely .000000001% of the raw unbridled genius of Brad Stevens and Co. We can’t question anything, because, I mean, the Pacers have lost 7 of 8 and only a Da Vinci like Brad could manage to not pass them in that span of time. Maybe he’s just not giving his all, because he’s about to simultaneously end climate change and cure all forms of cancer right before the playoffs start. Then we’ll go 16-0.

BOOK IT.

Could you let us in this parallel universe where all things  you said had a better result than the things happening is this universe? 

Re: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2019, 01:50:30 PM »

Offline drooldaddy

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 90
  • Tommy Points: 7
I had this conversation after the game last night with my son.
I told him that as someone who has watched almost every minute of every game this year I am entitled to an opinion.

I think the C’s have made 2 big mistakes this year . Sadly both of the are CBS mistakes.

1 . Starting Hayward before he was mentally and physically ready.

2. Sticking with Terry as a backup point. Terry has been awful. He just doesn’t have a point guard mentality. Wannamaker runs the second team better.

I suppose contracts and team chemistry effect both of these points.

This team is simply not good and no fun to watch.

I am done venting

Re: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« Reply #8 on: March 31, 2019, 02:06:26 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
I had this conversation after the game last night with my son.
I told him that as someone who has watched almost every minute of every game this year I am entitled to an opinion.

I think the C’s have made 2 big mistakes this year . Sadly both of the are CBS mistakes.

1 . Starting Hayward before he was mentally and physically ready.

2. Sticking with Terry as a backup point. Terry has been awful. He just doesn’t have a point guard mentality. Wannamaker runs the second team better.

I suppose contracts and team chemistry effect both of these points.

This team is simply not good and no fun to watch.

I am done venting

Same thoughts as well.
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« Reply #9 on: March 31, 2019, 02:17:10 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37784
  • Tommy Points: 3030
i hope DA takes a chance on Carsen Edwards .   We need a knock down shooter ....NOT a brick layer like Rozier

Re: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« Reply #10 on: March 31, 2019, 03:36:33 PM »

Offline ConnerHenry

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 522
  • Tommy Points: 59
To me, it seems that Wannamaker knows his role and plays accordingly. Rozier doesn't and it shows accordingly.

Re: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« Reply #11 on: March 31, 2019, 04:55:52 PM »

Offline PAOBoston

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8134
  • Tommy Points: 535
I had this conversation after the game last night with my son.
I told him that as someone who has watched almost every minute of every game this year I am entitled to an opinion.

I think the C’s have made 2 big mistakes this year . Sadly both of the are CBS mistakes.

1 . Starting Hayward before he was mentally and physically ready.

2. Sticking with Terry as a backup point. Terry has been awful. He just doesn’t have a point guard mentality. Wannamaker runs the second team better.

I suppose contracts and team chemistry effect both of these points.

This team is simply not good and no fun to watch.

I am done venting
The good news is I think the team will “flow” better next year with the subtractions of Rozier and Morris. I think that should help with the hierarchy of minutes and shot distributions. Assuming status quo of the top rotation players (I know Irving FA/AD doesn’t makes this certain at all), it makes Irving/Hayward/Horford/Brown/Tatum/Smart clearl cut top 6. Full in the gaps with cheap vets (ideally backup guard) and rookies (BPA at draft but ideally backup guard and rotation big man).

The bad news is the above doesn’t help us this year.

Re: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2019, 05:06:13 PM »

Online smokeablount

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3239
  • Tommy Points: 645
  • Mark Blount often got smoked
Just like I said in 2018.

And before the year that Hayward shouldn’t be starting.

And before the year that we needed to give RW minutes to develop him because we need him to be better than Theis is.

And before the year that Baynes should start.

But I must be wrong or just plain crazy, because my knowledge is merely .000000001% of the raw unbridled genius of Brad Stevens and Co. We can’t question anything, because, I mean, the Pacers have lost 7 of 8 and only a Da Vinci like Brad could manage to not pass them in that span of time. Maybe he’s just not giving his all, because he’s about to simultaneously end climate change and cure all forms of cancer right before the playoffs start. Then we’ll go 16-0.

BOOK IT.

Could you let us in this parallel universe where all things  you said had a better result than the things happening is this universe?

This parallel universe is Celticsblog, read my post history or start paying better attention. Clearly I’m wrong a lot, but I nailed all those predictions and dozens more.  They were obvious to me and have all been proven to be correct over this season.
CsBlog 05-25 Fantasy Draft Commish, OKC:

PG: SGA (24-25, MVP, 32 MPG)
SG: Kevin Durant (13-14, MVP, 39 MPG)
SF: ?
PF: ?
C: ?

Re: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« Reply #13 on: March 31, 2019, 06:08:22 PM »

Offline IDreamCeltics

  • NCE
  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1401
  • Tommy Points: 140
Just like I said in 2018.

And before the year that Hayward shouldn’t be starting.

And before the year that we needed to give RW minutes to develop him because we need him to be better than Theis is.

And before the year that Baynes should start.

But I must be wrong or just plain crazy, because my knowledge is merely .000000001% of the raw unbridled genius of Brad Stevens and Co. We can’t question anything, because, I mean, the Pacers have lost 7 of 8 and only a Da Vinci like Brad could manage to not pass them in that span of time. Maybe he’s just not giving his all, because he’s about to simultaneously end climate change and cure all forms of cancer right before the playoffs start. Then we’ll go 16-0.

BOOK IT.

Could you let us in this parallel universe where all things  you said had a better result than the things happening is this universe?

This parallel universe is Celticsblog, read my post history or start paying better attention. Clearly I’m wrong a lot, but I nailed all those predictions and dozens more.  They were obvious to me and have all been proven to be correct over this season.

Brad's system is insanely point guard friendly... It's fun to watch guys who just relax and let the game come to them in it. 
 
He's mangled player management a bit this year, but that's really on Danny Ainge in my opinion since no successful team has ever had 10 guys who all believe they should be starting on it.  These logjams should have been cleared up months ago to force Brad to play the right guys.

Re: Wannamaker is still better than Rozier
« Reply #14 on: March 31, 2019, 06:19:48 PM »

Offline jpd985

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 681
  • Tommy Points: 41
To me, it seems that Wannamaker knows his role and plays accordingly. Rozier doesn't and it shows accordingly.

I would agree with this. Rozier seems like he is trying to play like Irving but doesn’t have the talent to do so.