Call me crazy, but is it weird that I think we are better off having Derrick Rose than Kyrie Irving moving forward?
Granted, Rose is going to be 31 at the start of the new season, and the injury history, but he doesn't bring any drama or cryptic stuff, and as far as being a player, last season he showed that he can still be a pretty good one.
So if Kyrie goes, why not Rose to replace him? Will be cheap too.
Yeah, crazy, right?