Do we want to build around our young guys and be a good team for a long time like the Hawks a few years or so back? Or do we want to take a chance at being great and contending for championships? I'll choose the latter and trade Tatum plus for Davis and re-sign Kyrie.
Let's at least acknowledge that if you go the Kyrie and AD route, in a year's time we could be watching Horford, Davis, and Kyrie all leave in free agency while we're left with ... Robert Williams? Semi Ojeleye? Terry Rozier if we're dumb enough to sign him long term?
I could very easily see the following:
Celts trade everything for AD because they feel they have no choice. (Smart, Brown, Tatum, Williams, picks)
Kyrie re-signs on a two year deal with second year team option. He's giving it a chance with AD but not going to commit. Why give up your power?
Celts re-sign Mook b/c he's a Klutch client and they are now beholden to Klutch.
Celts match a 3-4 year offer sheet on Rozier b/c they view him as "Kyrie insurance" and the depth is gone after the trade.
The Celts go through another year of media speculation about whether AD or Kyrie will stay. The team is up and down. They struggle to separate from the Bucks, Raps, and Sixers, though they win 55ish games.
Ultimately, the Celts fall short of the Finals due to lack of depth, or perhaps because Kyrie or AD is limited by nagging injuries, as they often are.
AD and Kyrie decide to go elsewhere in summer 2020.
Our bright future of title contention is: Terry Rozier!