Sheridan- C's 3rd on Davis list likely a rental

[gouki88]

Hmmm, perhaps if enough C-level NBA people provide enough anonymous "reports" about AD not wanting Boston they'll ultimately equate to one credible report from a respectable NBA source.

Isn't that how this works?

As the saying goes, quantity over quality!

[Celtics4ever]

Sheridan is not credible.

[celticsclay]

Chris Sheridan long ago lost whatever credibility he had.

probably but there is a lot of smoke from a lot of different places.

But the fire seems to be in one place -- AD's agent, who clearly wants to steer him to the Lakers.


We heard the same stuff about Paul George and the Thunder.

perhapsbut Bontemps just did a piece on frustration from some of the younger C's.  MacMullen just said Irving is frustrated and worried about his load.  There is a lot of smoke about discourse on the C's, which Rich Paul can then use to his advantage

MacMullan also laughed when she was asked if there was truth to the rumors Kyrie might not re-sign. She said this was pure Rich Paul.

Is this true? If it really is, this should be the front page story. She has broken more stories about the Celtics than Sheridan and Boucher and whoever else combined.

[LarBrd33]

Chris Sheridan long ago lost whatever credibility he had.

probably but there is a lot of smoke from a lot of different places.

But the fire seems to be in one place -- AD's agent, who clearly wants to steer him to the Lakers.


We heard the same stuff about Paul George and the Thunder.

perhapsbut Bontemps just did a piece on frustration from some of the younger C's.  MacMullen just said Irving is frustrated and worried about his load.  There is a lot of smoke about discourse on the C's, which Rich Paul can then use to his advantage

MacMullan also laughed when she was asked if there was truth to the rumors Kyrie might not re-sign. She said this was pure Rich Paul.

Is this true? If it really is, this should be the front page story. She has broken more stories about the Celtics than Sheridan and Boucher and whoever else combined.

yeah Jackie laughed it off. 

Kyrie might not re-sign but the idea he is leaning towards leaving has no basis in reality.

[Moranis]

Chris Sheridan long ago lost whatever credibility he had.

probably but there is a lot of smoke from a lot of different places.

But the fire seems to be in one place -- AD's agent, who clearly wants to steer him to the Lakers.


We heard the same stuff about Paul George and the Thunder.

perhapsbut Bontemps just did a piece on frustration from some of the younger C's.  MacMullen just said Irving is frustrated and worried about his load.  There is a lot of smoke about discourse on the C's, which Rich Paul can then use to his advantage

MacMullan also laughed when she was asked if there was truth to the rumors Kyrie might not re-sign. She said this was pure Rich Paul.

Is this true? If it really is, this should be the front page story. She has broken more stories about the Celtics than Sheridan and Boucher and whoever else combined.

yeah Jackie laughed it off. 

Kyrie might not re-sign but the idea he is leaning towards leaving has no basis in reality.

sure but it apparently is affecting Davis' view of the C's which absolutely matters

[LarBrd33]

Chris Sheridan long ago lost whatever credibility he had.

probably but there is a lot of smoke from a lot of different places.

But the fire seems to be in one place -- AD's agent, who clearly wants to steer him to the Lakers.


We heard the same stuff about Paul George and the Thunder.

perhapsbut Bontemps just did a piece on frustration from some of the younger C's.  MacMullen just said Irving is frustrated and worried about his load.  There is a lot of smoke about discourse on the C's, which Rich Paul can then use to his advantage

MacMullan also laughed when she was asked if there was truth to the rumors Kyrie might not re-sign. She said this was pure Rich Paul.

Is this true? If it really is, this should be the front page story. She has broken more stories about the Celtics than Sheridan and Boucher and whoever else combined.

yeah Jackie laughed it off. 

Kyrie might not re-sign but the idea he is leaning towards leaving has no basis in reality.

sure but it apparently is affecting Davis' view of the C's which absolutely matters

no it doesn’t.  He’s not a free agent. Whether or not Davis wants to go to the Celtics right now makes no difference whatsoever. 

[Moranis]

Chris Sheridan long ago lost whatever credibility he had.

probably but there is a lot of smoke from a lot of different places.

But the fire seems to be in one place -- AD's agent, who clearly wants to steer him to the Lakers.


We heard the same stuff about Paul George and the Thunder.

perhapsbut Bontemps just did a piece on frustration from some of the younger C's.  MacMullen just said Irving is frustrated and worried about his load.  There is a lot of smoke about discourse on the C's, which Rich Paul can then use to his advantage

MacMullan also laughed when she was asked if there was truth to the rumors Kyrie might not re-sign. She said this was pure Rich Paul.

Is this true? If it really is, this should be the front page story. She has broken more stories about the Celtics than Sheridan and Boucher and whoever else combined.

yeah Jackie laughed it off. 

Kyrie might not re-sign but the idea he is leaning towards leaving has no basis in reality.

sure but it apparently is affecting Davis' view of the C's which absolutely matters

no it doesn’t.  He’s not a free agent.

but he will be 1 year after the C's could acquire him which absolutley affects if a team acquires him and for what value (thus affecting where said player ends up).  Are the C's going to give up Tatum and the potentially high picks for a 1 year rental? If not, Davis isn't a C

[LarBrd33]

Chris Sheridan long ago lost whatever credibility he had.

probably but there is a lot of smoke from a lot of different places.

But the fire seems to be in one place -- AD's agent, who clearly wants to steer him to the Lakers.


We heard the same stuff about Paul George and the Thunder.

perhapsbut Bontemps just did a piece on frustration from some of the younger C's.  MacMullen just said Irving is frustrated and worried about his load.  There is a lot of smoke about discourse on the C's, which Rich Paul can then use to his advantage

MacMullan also laughed when she was asked if there was truth to the rumors Kyrie might not re-sign. She said this was pure Rich Paul.

Is this true? If it really is, this should be the front page story. She has broken more stories about the Celtics than Sheridan and Boucher and whoever else combined.

yeah Jackie laughed it off. 

Kyrie might not re-sign but the idea he is leaning towards leaving has no basis in reality.

sure but it apparently is affecting Davis' view of the C's which absolutely matters

no it doesn’t.  He’s not a free agent.

but he will be 1 year after the C's could acquire him which absolutley affects if a team acquires him and for what value (thus affecting where said player ends up).  Are the C's going to give up Tatum and the potentially high picks for a 1 year rental? If not, Davis isn't a C

Think about what you are saying.  Map it out.  You’re arguing that the perceived indecisiveness of kyrie will impact whether Davis wants to play in Boston.  Boston can’t trade for Davis until kyrie hits free agency. This literally doesn’t matter right now. 

Either kyrie re-signs ... in which case it immediately negates this entire premise... or kyrie leaves ... in which case - whatever. It might not even make sense to trade for Davis at that point.

As far as how Davis feels about Boston right now - doesn’t make a [dang] difference.  If I’m him I prefer the lakers too because they can literally trade for me right now and I can get out of New Orleans immediately.

[Birdman]

What if New York trades for AD, would Kyrie go to Knicks also? i think so,

[celticsclay]

Chris Sheridan long ago lost whatever credibility he had.

probably but there is a lot of smoke from a lot of different places.

But the fire seems to be in one place -- AD's agent, who clearly wants to steer him to the Lakers.


We heard the same stuff about Paul George and the Thunder.

perhapsbut Bontemps just did a piece on frustration from some of the younger C's.  MacMullen just said Irving is frustrated and worried about his load.  There is a lot of smoke about discourse on the C's, which Rich Paul can then use to his advantage

MacMullan also laughed when she was asked if there was truth to the rumors Kyrie might not re-sign. She said this was pure Rich Paul.

Is this true? If it really is, this should be the front page story. She has broken more stories about the Celtics than Sheridan and Boucher and whoever else combined.

yeah Jackie laughed it off. 

Kyrie might not re-sign but the idea he is leaning towards leaving has no basis in reality.

sure but it apparently is affecting Davis' view of the C's which absolutely matters

no it doesn’t.  He’s not a free agent.

but he will be 1 year after the C's could acquire him which absolutley affects if a team acquires him and for what value (thus affecting where said player ends up).  Are the C's going to give up Tatum and the potentially high picks for a 1 year rental? If not, Davis isn't a C

Think about what you are saying.  Map it out.  You’re arguing that the perceived indecisiveness of kyrie will impact whether Davis wants to play in Boston.  Boston can’t trade for Davis until kyrie hits free agency. This literally doesn’t matter right now. 

Either kyrie re-signs ... in which case it immediately negates this entire premise... or kyrie leaves ... in which case - whatever. It might not even make sense to trade for Davis at that point.

As far as how Davis feels about Boston right now - doesn’t make a [dang] difference.  If I’m him I prefer the lakers too because they can literally trade for me right now and I can get out of New Orleans immediately.

Can this be pinned to the top of the thread. This is brilliant.

[LarBrd33]

Chris Sheridan long ago lost whatever credibility he had.

probably but there is a lot of smoke from a lot of different places.

But the fire seems to be in one place -- AD's agent, who clearly wants to steer him to the Lakers.


We heard the same stuff about Paul George and the Thunder.

perhapsbut Bontemps just did a piece on frustration from some of the younger C's.  MacMullen just said Irving is frustrated and worried about his load.  There is a lot of smoke about discourse on the C's, which Rich Paul can then use to his advantage

MacMullan also laughed when she was asked if there was truth to the rumors Kyrie might not re-sign. She said this was pure Rich Paul.

Is this true? If it really is, this should be the front page story. She has broken more stories about the Celtics than Sheridan and Boucher and whoever else combined.

yeah Jackie laughed it off. 

Kyrie might not re-sign but the idea he is leaning towards leaving has no basis in reality.

sure but it apparently is affecting Davis' view of the C's which absolutely matters

no it doesn’t.  He’s not a free agent.

but he will be 1 year after the C's could acquire him which absolutley affects if a team acquires him and for what value (thus affecting where said player ends up).  Are the C's going to give up Tatum and the potentially high picks for a 1 year rental? If not, Davis isn't a C

Think about what you are saying.  Map it out.  You’re arguing that the perceived indecisiveness of kyrie will impact whether Davis wants to play in Boston.  Boston can’t trade for Davis until kyrie hits free agency. This literally doesn’t matter right now. 

Either kyrie re-signs ... in which case it immediately negates this entire premise... or kyrie leaves ... in which case - whatever. It might not even make sense to trade for Davis at that point.

As far as how Davis feels about Boston right now - doesn’t make a [dang] difference.  If I’m him I prefer the lakers too because they can literally trade for me right now and I can get out of New Orleans immediately.

Can this be pinned to the top of the thread. This is brilliant.

I mean the truth is that it’s going to work out in reverse. Who cares what Davis thinks?  What matters is what kyrie thinks.  What will end up happening is Kyrie will hit free agency, and Boston will make their offer to the pelicans contingent on Kyrie staying.  In other words, Boston will have a chat with the pelicans, find out what they want for Davis, and come to kyrie in their negotiations with him to say “ok kyrie, we obviously want you to stay ... what’s it going to take? ... here’s what we would need to give up to get Davis ... if you want us to do it, we will pull the trigger, but the most important thing is you staying”...  how Davis feels doesn’t make any difference.

[Moranis]

Chris Sheridan long ago lost whatever credibility he had.

probably but there is a lot of smoke from a lot of different places.

But the fire seems to be in one place -- AD's agent, who clearly wants to steer him to the Lakers.


We heard the same stuff about Paul George and the Thunder.

perhapsbut Bontemps just did a piece on frustration from some of the younger C's.  MacMullen just said Irving is frustrated and worried about his load.  There is a lot of smoke about discourse on the C's, which Rich Paul can then use to his advantage

MacMullan also laughed when she was asked if there was truth to the rumors Kyrie might not re-sign. She said this was pure Rich Paul.

Is this true? If it really is, this should be the front page story. She has broken more stories about the Celtics than Sheridan and Boucher and whoever else combined.

yeah Jackie laughed it off. 

Kyrie might not re-sign but the idea he is leaning towards leaving has no basis in reality.

sure but it apparently is affecting Davis' view of the C's which absolutely matters

no it doesn’t.  He’s not a free agent.

but he will be 1 year after the C's could acquire him which absolutley affects if a team acquires him and for what value (thus affecting where said player ends up).  Are the C's going to give up Tatum and the potentially high picks for a 1 year rental? If not, Davis isn't a C

Think about what you are saying.  Map it out.  You’re arguing that the perceived indecisiveness of kyrie will impact whether Davis wants to play in Boston.  Boston can’t trade for Davis until kyrie hits free agency. This literally doesn’t matter right now. 

Either kyrie re-signs ... in which case it immediately negates this entire premise... or kyrie leaves ... in which case - whatever. It might not even make sense to trade for Davis at that point.

As far as how Davis feels about Boston right now - doesn’t make a [dang] difference.  If I’m him I prefer the lakers too because they can literally trade for me right now and I can get out of New Orleans immediately.

Presumably Boston would have to make the deal before the draft though, which wouldn't be finalized until after free agency opens.  How is Boston going to make that deal without knowing for sure what Irving is going to do?  And unless you are 100% sure that acquiring Davis will get Irving to stay, you have to be hesitant to make the deal.

[Birdman]

Davis top 3:

1 Lakers
2 Lakers
3 Lakers

Just like Leonard and Butler will go to Clippers..

[LarBrd33]

Chris Sheridan long ago lost whatever credibility he had.

probably but there is a lot of smoke from a lot of different places.

But the fire seems to be in one place -- AD's agent, who clearly wants to steer him to the Lakers.


We heard the same stuff about Paul George and the Thunder.

perhapsbut Bontemps just did a piece on frustration from some of the younger C's.  MacMullen just said Irving is frustrated and worried about his load.  There is a lot of smoke about discourse on the C's, which Rich Paul can then use to his advantage

MacMullan also laughed when she was asked if there was truth to the rumors Kyrie might not re-sign. She said this was pure Rich Paul.

Is this true? If it really is, this should be the front page story. She has broken more stories about the Celtics than Sheridan and Boucher and whoever else combined.

yeah Jackie laughed it off. 

Kyrie might not re-sign but the idea he is leaning towards leaving has no basis in reality.

sure but it apparently is affecting Davis' view of the C's which absolutely matters

no it doesn’t.  He’s not a free agent.

but he will be 1 year after the C's could acquire him which absolutley affects if a team acquires him and for what value (thus affecting where said player ends up).  Are the C's going to give up Tatum and the potentially high picks for a 1 year rental? If not, Davis isn't a C

Think about what you are saying.  Map it out.  You’re arguing that the perceived indecisiveness of kyrie will impact whether Davis wants to play in Boston.  Boston can’t trade for Davis until kyrie hits free agency. This literally doesn’t matter right now. 

Either kyrie re-signs ... in which case it immediately negates this entire premise... or kyrie leaves ... in which case - whatever. It might not even make sense to trade for Davis at that point.

As far as how Davis feels about Boston right now - doesn’t make a [dang] difference.  If I’m him I prefer the lakers too because they can literally trade for me right now and I can get out of New Orleans immediately.

Presumably Boston would have to make the deal before the draft though, which wouldn't be finalized until after free agency opens.  How is Boston going to make that deal without knowing for sure what Irving is going to do?  And unless you are 100% sure that acquiring Davis will get Irving to stay, you have to be hesitant to make the deal.

they can discuss the deal but they aren’t going to make any deal until they know kyrie’s intentions. 

It messes up our draft for sure, but oh well.

[gpap]

Chris Sheridan long ago lost whatever credibility he had.

He was however, one of the first ones to report that Lebron was going back to Cleveland after leaving Miami in 2014.

Regardless, something like the Celts being 3rd on Davis' list is literally something I can't take seriously.