Among guys playing 1000 minutes, Baynes was:
#3 in the NBA in "screen assists" per minute;
#4 (tied) in the NBA in charges taken per minute;
#12 in the NBA in contested 2PT shots per minute
Those are very impressive "little things" that help win games.
Analytics prattle. The market for him tells us more about who he is.
The analytics are data, with advantages and limitations for their specific purposes. The data Roy presented are informative, and there are other positive things that Baynes does on the court. The Pistons were 10 points better with him on the court defensively last year, for example.
Also, the notion of "the market" is a bit murky right now. It seems that we are seeing a rebound effect from last summer. There are players who, like Baynes, have ended up signing for less than a player option they turned down.
Baynes turned down a $6.5 million option, and then went with the Cs because he wanted to get minutes on a contender. He had offers from other teams.
It's entirely possible that last year he would have gotten $10 million per year and a longer contract, given what was happening then.
So, I think the idea that he's not good because it's a down market this year is unjustified.
As always it'll be a question of fit, but if he gives us 15 solid mpg next year with good defense and rebounding, and knocks people around a bit, then that will have filled exactly our biggest remaining roster need.