Danny stillhad the best offer. Indy didn't want George in the East.
Why would they care? It's not like they will be contending anytime soon or he holds a grudge against them.
Who knows why they care, but it was obvious that it played into their decision making process.
They turned down a deal that would have gotten them K Love from the Cavs, and they turned down probably a better deal from us (from a rebuilding stand point). Add those two things together alone and it seems obvious Indy didn't want to trade PG to a contender in the East.
Why does it need to be more complicated than that? So much misguided anger in the last day. DA should have done this, he should have offered more, blah blah blah. That is such bs. Indy decided it didn't want to trade PG to Clev or Boston and shipped him out west. End of story.
Misguided anger by who? Since you quoted me, I'll assure you there is no anger here. I never said or inferred we should have offered more. I don't believe we should have to overpay.
I can understand not wanting to take on Love's contract. We've seen him as the top guy before, we know how that goes.
But to suggest they shouldn't take the best offer because they play in the same conference (not even same division) would be ineptitude at its finest. Take 50 cents (at best) on the dollar AND a bad contract to get him in the other conference. They aren't playoff bound for the foreseeable future, so it comes down to what, playing him 3-4 times vs only twice? I can understand the Celtics not trading say, Bradley or Smart interconference, because they are amongst the EC elite.
That's a joke of an excuse for a GM. The goal is to make your team as good as possible, not worry about potentially making another team that's already better than you even better.
Did Indy maximize their return last night? The answer is absolutely not. That's not Ainge's fault. End of story.