So Indy turned down Kevin Love for this pile of garbage?
Even Houston's offer was better than this. LIterally ANY team could have trumped this. Just unreal.
There must be some truth to the theory that they just didn't want to ship George to an Eastern rival.
As moronic as that sounds, it's the only possibility that makes sense.
Either that or they are part of a conspiracy to get him to the Lakers for free after this experiment in OKC fails (and it will).
OKC's got their KD35 replacement...for at least a year. But their legit reason is they did not want to trade him to an Eastern Conference rival.
How are they rivals though when they are likely to be a lottery team with no stars?
By the time they get back on their feet the C's and Cavs' current cores will be long gone.
It boggles the mind.
They clearly don't think that. The package they took back is for a team wanting to be competitive again in 2-3 years, not 5. If George stayed in Boston, surely they'd have to go through him.
Good luck with a 2-3 year rebuild. They'll be a bad team next year. They'll open up some cap next free agency, but are unlikely to attract any max FAs and have a lot of cap the following year. However, they have no picks but their own and outside of Turner, there's nothing on the roster that smells good and TJ Leaf isn't moving the needle much.
I saw Ramona Shelburne, who broke the story, on ESPN and she said a lot of teams were shocked by how little the Pacers got and she thought there were better offers, but Pacers wanted PG out of the East. Then she said that she thought a better deal was available with the Lakers (whom she covers), but the Pacers weren't going to do it because they weren't getting Ball and they weren't going to help PG get to the Lakers. Obviously, no one knows, but that sounds more like an owners mentality than a GM's. She also said she knew the Pacers had a better offer at the trade deadline.
BTW, I mentioned VO's PER before as 13.6 PER during the season. However, he was 6.9 in the playoffs.