0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: jpotter33 on June 17, 2017, 10:41:33 PMhttps://twitter.com/WojVerticalNBA/status/876267930572513282QuoteSources: For top pick, Sixers planning to send Celtics '17 No. 3 overall pick, '18 FRP (via LA) and '19 FRP (via Kings) - w/ protections.Woooooowwww. So it is their pick this year, the LA pick, and the Sacramento pick, though there are some protections. They'll have to be minimal, though. And at least one of those has to be fully unprotected.Depending upon the protections, that's actually a TON of value for the pick, regardless of whether or not we should've done it.If we get that package, and the protections are reasonable, I can buy into Danny's thinking.
https://twitter.com/WojVerticalNBA/status/876267930572513282QuoteSources: For top pick, Sixers planning to send Celtics '17 No. 3 overall pick, '18 FRP (via LA) and '19 FRP (via Kings) - w/ protections.Woooooowwww. So it is their pick this year, the LA pick, and the Sacramento pick, though there are some protections. They'll have to be minimal, though. And at least one of those has to be fully unprotected.Depending upon the protections, that's actually a TON of value for the pick, regardless of whether or not we should've done it.
Sources: For top pick, Sixers planning to send Celtics '17 No. 3 overall pick, '18 FRP (via LA) and '19 FRP (via Kings) - w/ protections.
https://twitter.com/KeithSmithNBA/status/876269580091621376Multiple NBA sources believe Celtics are working on another deal. One told me: "Who cares about the protections? They aren't keeping them."
Wow. If the protections are reasonable, then we destroyed them.
Crowder, Zeller, #3 for GeorgeIT. RozierAB. SmartHayward. JaylenGeorge. JerebkoHorford. Zizic* two top 5 picks and Yabu in 18,
Quote from: Snakehead on June 17, 2017, 10:47:54 PMhttps://twitter.com/KeithSmithNBA/status/876269580091621376Multiple NBA sources believe Celtics are working on another deal. One told me: "Who cares about the protections? They aren't keeping them."That doesn't make sense though. Protected draft picks aren't as valuable as unprotected draft picks in trades either.
Quote from: jpotter33 on June 17, 2017, 10:45:28 PMhttps://twitter.com/SeanDeveney/status/876267194878971904?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fbleacherreport.com%2Fboston-celticsQuoteCeltics and Sixers trade is nearly there. Will set up Sixers to take Fultz, but most league execs say Celtics are not done dealingAnd this being a precursor trade for Butler/George is looking more and more likely.Ugh.If we trade a fist-full of top picks for a year of Paul George I'm going to be ill.
https://twitter.com/SeanDeveney/status/876267194878971904?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fbleacherreport.com%2Fboston-celticsQuoteCeltics and Sixers trade is nearly there. Will set up Sixers to take Fultz, but most league execs say Celtics are not done dealingAnd this being a precursor trade for Butler/George is looking more and more likely.
Celtics and Sixers trade is nearly there. Will set up Sixers to take Fultz, but most league execs say Celtics are not done dealing
I'm interested to see what are the conditions if either pick doesn't convey, as they aren't Philly's own picks.
Quote from: PhoSita on June 17, 2017, 10:46:30 PMQuote from: jpotter33 on June 17, 2017, 10:45:28 PMhttps://twitter.com/SeanDeveney/status/876267194878971904?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fbleacherreport.com%2Fboston-celticsQuoteCeltics and Sixers trade is nearly there. Will set up Sixers to take Fultz, but most league execs say Celtics are not done dealingAnd this being a precursor trade for Butler/George is looking more and more likely.Ugh.If we trade a fist-full of top picks for a year of Paul George I'm going to be ill.So let's say George costs something like Bradley, the 3rd pick, and the top-3 or so protected Sacramento pick as the principal pieces, would you not be okay with that? We'd be adding Paul George now plus adding an additional shot at a top-5 pick next year in a draft loaded with frontcourt players, which we desperately need.I'm probably still leaning more towards keeping Fultz, but it's hard to be too mad in that scenario.
Quote from: Eddie20 on June 17, 2017, 10:48:55 PMWow. If the protections are reasonable, then we destroyed them.We really need to see the next move before evaluating.Is it George or Butler? Or someone else?
https://twitter.com/KeithSmithNBA/status/876269033536061440?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fbleacherreport.com%2Fboston-celticsQuoteSources: Joshua Jackson & Celtics working to set up meeting. Boston would like to meet with Lonzo Ball, but no indications Ball has interestHere we go.
Sources: Joshua Jackson & Celtics working to set up meeting. Boston would like to meet with Lonzo Ball, but no indications Ball has interest
We really need some more clarification on the pick protections. I can't imagine that Danny accepted anything more than top-3 for the Sacramento pick, and I can't imagine that he allowed ANY protections on next year's picks.But my God, that's going to be 3 straight years (totaling 4 overall picks) that have a decent shot of being top-5. Some of those have to be for a trade.
Quote from: jpotter33 on June 17, 2017, 10:48:59 PMBut my God, that's going to be 3 straight years (totaling 4 overall picks) that have a decent shot of being top-5. Some of those have to be for a trade.Hey, if we're lucky one of those picks might turn into the number one selection in a draft with a consensus number one guy.
But my God, that's going to be 3 straight years (totaling 4 overall picks) that have a decent shot of being top-5. Some of those have to be for a trade.