Author Topic: Report: Melo would waive no-trade for C's; Stevens would like him, Ainge doesn't  (Read 44507 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Eddie20

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8497
  • Tommy Points: 975
http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/celtics/2017/01/29/could-celtics-become-part-carmelo-anthony-trade/WN2SEabku427qw0sGxbuPK/story.html

Quote
MILWAUKEE — The Knicks haven’t given up hope on including the Celtics as a partner in a potential deal for Carmelo Anthony, sending a scout to Saturday’s Celtics-Bucks game.

While Celtics management told the Knicks they aren’t interested in the nine-time All-Star, the Knicks are pushing to move Anthony, according to an NBA source, and they’re intrigued by some of the Celtics’ players.

A source indicated that Knicks president Phil Jackson has instructed management to move Anthony, who has a no-trade clause but included the Celtics as one of the teams for whom he’d waive the clause. Boston could become part of a potential three-team deal that would send Anthony to another club, perhaps the Clippers.

An NBA source said Celtics coach Brad Stevens would embrace coaching Anthony, but president of basketball operations Danny Ainge has rejected any deal. That hasn’t stopped the Knicks from scouting Celtics players just in case Boston is willing to become part of a trade.

Anthony is averaging 22.6 points, 6.2 rebounds and 3.0 assists this season for the disappointing Knicks (21-27), who are two games out of the eighth playoff spot in the East. Anthony has faced scrutiny in recent years, and Jackson has been one of Anthony’s biggest critics.

Offline Cman

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13074
  • Tommy Points: 121
http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/celtics/2017/01/29/could-celtics-become-part-carmelo-anthony-trade/WN2SEabku427qw0sGxbuPK/story.html

Quote
MILWAUKEE — The Knicks haven’t given up hope on including the Celtics as a partner in a potential deal for Carmelo Anthony, sending a scout to Saturday’s Celtics-Bucks game.

While Celtics management told the Knicks they aren’t interested in the nine-time All-Star, the Knicks are pushing to move Anthony, according to an NBA source, and they’re intrigued by some of the Celtics’ players.

A source indicated that Knicks president Phil Jackson has instructed management to move Anthony, who has a no-trade clause but included the Celtics as one of the teams for whom he’d waive the clause. Boston could become part of a potential three-team deal that would send Anthony to another club, perhaps the Clippers.

An NBA source said Celtics coach Brad Stevens would embrace coaching Anthony, but president of basketball operations Danny Ainge has rejected any deal. That hasn’t stopped the Knicks from scouting Celtics players just in case Boston is willing to become part of a trade.

Anthony is averaging 22.6 points, 6.2 rebounds and 3.0 assists this season for the disappointing Knicks (21-27), who are two games out of the eighth playoff spot in the East. Anthony has faced scrutiny in recent years, and Jackson has been one of Anthony’s biggest critics.

Smoke and mirrors.
Celtics fan for life.

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
Drumming up the price for the Clippers :P
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Offline rondohondo

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10764
  • Tommy Points: 1196
Most I would do would be Jae and a non brk/Jaylen pick. Plus filler.

They don't have many options if they want to at least get something back from a team he will agree to go to.

Offline max215

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8448
  • Tommy Points: 624
I'm genuinely shocked that Brad would have any interest in coaching Melo.
Isaiah, you were lightning in a bottle.

DKC Clippers

Offline rayallen_35_24

  • Joe Mazzulla
  • Posts: 147
  • Tommy Points: 6
The Celtics present the only realistic trade destination for Anthony, according to Chris Mannix of Yahoo Sports. In a video posted on CSNNE, Mannix says Ainge is in a “great position” to present the Knicks with a lowball offer and dare them to keep Anthony past the February 23rd deadline. Mannix speculates that any deal wouldn’t involve the Nets’ first-rounders that Boston owns for the next two seasons, but may include other Celtics draft picks. He also dismissed recent rumors of a Knicks-Clippers deal, saying it won’t happen unless New York is willing to accept a “garbage package” involving Austin Rivers, Jamal Crawford and others

Offline alley oop

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 495
  • Tommy Points: 30

Offline Jvalin

  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3781
  • Tommy Points: 739
Don't want Melo. I would try to make a 3-way trade with NY and Cleveland.

Love to Boston
Melo to Cleveland
non Brooklyn pick(s) + Amir + (insert players) to NY

Offline bogg

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 817
  • Tommy Points: 51
Most I would do would be Jae and a non brk/Jaylen pick. Plus filler.

They don't have many options if they want to at least get something back from a team he will agree to go to.

No Jae. There's no need to give up good players to land Anthony with what the Clippers are able to offer, and you want to save as much as possible for a Jimmy Butler trade. Expirings and non-Brooklyn picks. If they want any of Rozier/Mickey/Jackson/Young/rights to Nader they're welcome to them, but no Smart or Jaylen. Olynyk can be discussed (especially because he potentially gets expensive next year), but if you're including all of Zeller/Amir/Olynyk in a deal you need some frontcourt depth coming back.

I'm genuinely shocked that Brad would have any interest in coaching Melo.

Carmelo's a really good fit as a power forward in Steven's system and Brad knows that teams have been able to make life miserable for Isaiah in the playoffs for two years running. Without a second option teams have to gameplan for (and Horford isn't that guy) they're not getting past Toronto, much less Cleveland.

Offline hodgy03038

  • NCE
  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3820
  • Tommy Points: 461
Don't want Melo. I would try to make a 3-way trade with NY and Cleveland.

Love to Boston
Melo to Cleveland
non Brooklyn pick(s) + Amir + (insert players) to NY

Cleveland didn't want Melo for Love a week ago. How has that changed?

Offline rickyfan3.0...

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 990
  • Tommy Points: 110
i am soooooooo split on this.

My knee jerk reaction was "No way"... but the more I think about it, the more my interest is piqued. Teams would have to stop covering IT with their SF's like they are starting to do now (not that it's working).

He isn't a perfect fit, but he is a GREAT offensive player, and gives us another option in big games. Isn't it almost worth it to just go get a "star" at a discounted rate, just for the value add? It's kind of what we did with Ray Allen? He wasn't exactly what we needed at the time, but we stole him and it made us a better team, and more of a destination.

I still believe our perfect match is Jimmy Butler, and he makes us a contender, but if that is off the table, is it worth exploring this as almost a lateral move?

I don't love Melo, but I think in this system, he becomes more efficient and having IT and Melo out there together would be pretty dynamic, especially since they both get "star" calls.



If you can get him for the right price, which hopefully means keeping the Nets picks, is it worth it

Offline JOMVP

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1378
  • Tommy Points: 100
I think Danny is playing hard to get on this one. If Brad would embrace Carmello in his system, I doubt Ainge would doubt he could implement him. Its just up to him to get him as cheap as possible. Obviously, Ainge probably has reservations about adding him and eating into our max cap space for next year - but there is some doubt of the possibility of adding a max guy next year anyway. Utah will probably keep Hayward, who knows with Blake. Carmello would add more scoring depth, and we could still add a complimentary big while keeping our two coveted firsts. I'm all for it, honestly.

Offline Eddie20

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8497
  • Tommy Points: 975
Most I would do would be Jae and a non brk/Jaylen pick. Plus filler.

Really? Why?

Crowder - Anthony

Age 26 - 32
Contract (Yrs left and salary owed) 6.2, 6.7, 7.3 7.8 - 24.5, 26.2, 27.9
PPG 14.0 - 22.6
RPG 5.2 - 6.2
APG 2.3 - 3.0
FG% 48.8 - 43.4
FT% 90.6 - 82.9
3PT% 42.7 - 36.6

Anthony is a better isolation scorer, but he's a ball stopper and nowhere as efficient. Crowder is improving yearly, while Anthony has been declining. Then, you have to consider the contact and the fact that you would be paying Crowder roughly 1/4 the price of Anthony. And let's not even bring up the D.

Offline rickyfan3.0...

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 990
  • Tommy Points: 110
If you can do this without giving up any major assets, it might be wise to look at it as Melo vs Gordon Hayward... You sign Melo, you don't have a shot to sign Hayward. So who would you rather have, Melo for 2 1/2 years or Hayward for 6 or 7 at max money?

Offline Mattybriand

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 215
  • Tommy Points: 29
TP for the link

I'll be honest I'd love to see what Brad could cook up.... don't destroy me for this *fingers crossed*