Gotta laugh at this in depth analysis of a tiny sample size for a guy who was getting to the rim whenever he pleased and just happend to miss the lay up in his first few games.
DUde this is the last I'll say about this, because people are misunderstanding the point of me bringing up Summer League.
Go back to pre-draft and almost every single blog, mock, draft website, media type, etc was saying this was a 2 player draft (Simmons and to a lesser extent the Ingrams project) with a lot of mediocrity following them. Almost every single mock had Jaylen going 8th. The consensus was that he was a raw young prospect who put up awful advanced stats in College, couldn't shoot and and had an uncanny inability to finish at the hoop. Against College talent, he could bully his way to the basket, but for whatever reason he couldn't finish. Bill Simmons brought it up several times on his podcast that Jaylen looked like Jeff Green if Jeff Green couldn't finish at the hoop.
The pick was far from unanimously well-received. I was for it, but many Celtic fans here were outraged. Celtic fans at the draft were disgusted. Wyc was famously booed. This happened a few months ago.
In Summer League,
he was exactly as billed. Everything I had heard about him was on display. As billed, he could get to the basket. As billed, he was a terrible shooter (22% from three). As billed, he had an uncanny inability to finish at the basket (32% shooting). As billed, he was raw and athletic. He also was surprisingly kind of weak defensively - which was something he was expected to be able to make an immediate impact at off the bench.
Nothing about Jaylen's Summer League disproved the criticism he received when he was labelled a Tier 3 prospect with some potential potential. Nothing about it was surprising. He looked like the player everyone said he was... raw, athletic, ability to get to the basket, poor shooter, poor finisher, might struggle to get consistent minutes and shot attempts on a team in win-now mode unless his defense improved dramatically enough for him to make an impact on that end off the bench.
Call it a 'great" performance that he put up bulk stats while playing against College-level talent. The bottom line is that he struggled in all the ways we were told he'd struggle. Following Summer League, he actually dropped to #9 on the NBA.com Rookie Ladder this thread is based on:
http://www.nba.com/2016/news/features/scott_howard_cooper/07/17/2016-17-rookie-ladder-summer-league-edition-4/In pre-season he was the second least efficient player on the team above Jerebko.
None of this really mattered, because he was going to a perfect situation where he'd be able to develop over the next several years on a winning team with an excellent coach and quality pro's pros like Jae Crowder to go against daily in practice. His ceiling was considerably higher by going to Boston as opposed to being drafted by a team like the Kings.
So you can pretend like you're not surprised that he's started the regular season shooting 53%... 44% from three... and just droped 19 points, 5 rebounds, 2 assists, 3 steals and 1 block against LeBron James. Maybe you're genuinely not surprised by this. You should be. Nothing we saw leading up to this season suggested he'd be this efficient. And I highly, highly doubt he'll continue putting up those shooting percentages. He can be great long-term, but he still has a really long way to go. It's undeniably exciting to see him putting up performances like that in the 5th game of his career. Be appropriately excited about the signs of development... waste less time retroactively pretending that we saw this coming all along. Nobody did. The consensus here was that he'd shoot under 40% this season. Most here didn't even expect to see him get his first start until next year (I think I won the poll by guessing he'd get a start in early December).