Author Topic: 2016 Summer League Thread  (Read 55912 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #105 on: July 08, 2016, 10:46:12 PM »

Offline Beat LA

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8338
  • Tommy Points: 896
  • Mr. Emoji
I wouldn't put much thought into it. It's summer league. Chill out. I bet that if Smart is playing in the SL this year, he would take Dunn's lunch

And if that did happen, Dunn would then take Smart's ;).

Celtics was undefeated last year with Smart on the court. Dunn already had a loss in his first game. Granted, it doesn't tell the whole story.

Woo ::).  Didn't he also shoot line 29% or something? :o

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #106 on: July 08, 2016, 10:48:32 PM »

Offline Beat LA

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8338
  • Tommy Points: 896
  • Mr. Emoji
I wouldn't put much thought into it. It's summer league. Chill out. I bet that if Smart is playing in the SL this year, he would take Dunn's lunch
I wouldn't count on it.  Smart sucked in Summer league both times he played in it. 

For those who were desperate to get Dunn, this game is going to irk them.  But they should be reminded that Dunn will be turning 23 years old during his rookie season.  He spent several years playing College ball.   Don't compare him to Brown (a 19 year old a year removed from High School).  It's a waste of time.

Irrelevant, imo, and I have no idea why people hold the fact that Dunn chose to stay in school and get his degree against him ::).

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #107 on: July 08, 2016, 10:53:54 PM »

Offline mr. dee

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8076
  • Tommy Points: 615
I wouldn't put much thought into it. It's summer league. Chill out. I bet that if Smart is playing in the SL this year, he would take Dunn's lunch
I wouldn't count on it.  Smart sucked in Summer league both times he played in it. 

For those who were desperate to get Dunn, this game is going to irk them.  But they should be reminded that Dunn will be turning 23 years old during his rookie season.  He spent several years playing College ball.   Don't compare him to Brown (a 19 year old a year removed from High School).  It's a waste of time.

With the experience Smart gained against the likes of Westbrook, Milsap, Klay, etc. Dunn would be no different. Smart shut down elite players in the league. What makes you think it will be different against a rookie who haven't even sniffed in the regular season?

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #108 on: July 08, 2016, 11:00:11 PM »

Offline mr. dee

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8076
  • Tommy Points: 615
I wouldn't put much thought into it. It's summer league. Chill out. I bet that if Smart is playing in the SL this year, he would take Dunn's lunch
I wouldn't count on it.  Smart sucked in Summer league both times he played in it. 

For those who were desperate to get Dunn, this game is going to irk them.  But they should be reminded that Dunn will be turning 23 years old during his rookie season.  He spent several years playing College ball.   Don't compare him to Brown (a 19 year old a year removed from High School).  It's a waste of time.

Irrelevant, imo, and I have no idea why people hold the fact that Dunn chose to stay in school and get his degree against him ::).

I haven't checked the stats from last year but I'm sure he drew many FTs from it.

Smart is the type that would not be discouraged with poor FG% (although it hurt sometimes) and will his way into win by other means like passing, rebounding and defense.. Dunn could be the same so I'll hold my judgement for him later.

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #109 on: July 08, 2016, 11:11:27 PM »

Offline alldaboston

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Tommy Points: 324
Who's watching the lakers Pelicans game? I'm interested to see how LA's NBA roster fares against the Pelicans summer league team.
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.

you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #110 on: July 08, 2016, 11:16:24 PM »

Offline Beat LA

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8338
  • Tommy Points: 896
  • Mr. Emoji
I wouldn't put much thought into it. It's summer league. Chill out. I bet that if Smart is playing in the SL this year, he would take Dunn's lunch
I wouldn't count on it.  Smart sucked in Summer league both times he played in it. 

For those who were desperate to get Dunn, this game is going to irk them.  But they should be reminded that Dunn will be turning 23 years old during his rookie season.  He spent several years playing College ball.   Don't compare him to Brown (a 19 year old a year removed from High School).  It's a waste of time.

Irrelevant, imo, and I have no idea why people hold the fact that Dunn chose to stay in school and get his degree against him ::).

I haven't checked the stats from last year but I'm sure he drew many FTs from it.

Smart is the type that would not be discouraged with poor FG% (although it hurt sometimes) and will his way into win by other means like passing, rebounding and defense.. Dunn could be the same so I'll hold my judgement for him later.

And yet he still shot 29%, lol.  Brb, finding stats ;D.

Edit: found stats ;D, and I stand corrected.  Smart shot 29% in his first summer league, and 35% last year, albeit the former being a much larger sample size due to injury, but still, that's not much of an improvement.  Welp :-\.

Can we please recognize the entire reason we are having this conversation is that up till now Smart has been a bust?

Any half way decent guard would be forcing this conversation at this point because Smart has simply not lived up to expectations.  He needs to come back with an offensive game about 300% better than he was last year to make this conversation go away.
It's a fair point, Eja.

Summer-League is Summer-League, but you can at least compare players who played on that same level.

2014 Smart - 14.8 points, 4.2 assists, 4.2 rebounds, 2 steals, 0.4 blocks - 29%/26%/83% - 5 games - 29.2mpg

2015 Smart - 16 points, 4.2 assists, 3 rebounds, 2.4 steals,0.4 blocks - 35%/28%/84% in 24.9mpg

2015 Rozier - 12.3 points, 3.9 assists, 3 rebounds, 1.3 steals, 0.1 blocks - 35%/40%/83% in 27.8mpg

2016 Rozier (so far) - 19 points, 5 assists, 6.3 rebounds, 1 steal, 0.3 blocks, 46%/33%/82% - 29.1mpg

Rozer's been better.  But it should be noted that Smart was pretty bad in both his attempts at Summer league.
« Last Edit: July 08, 2016, 11:22:00 PM by Beat LA »

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #111 on: July 08, 2016, 11:26:14 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51955
  • Tommy Points: 3186
How have Ingram and Hield looked?
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Check out my Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Yakin_Bassin/shorts

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #112 on: July 08, 2016, 11:31:59 PM »

Offline alldaboston

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Tommy Points: 324
Guys what do you think about the Lakers rebuild? You have to give them credit. They've found good pieces for their team. Russell is the real deal, anyone who says otherwise is either hating on him because he's a laker or still has the phone controversy in mind. Clarkson (who isn't playing summer league) is a scorer, LA found themselves a steal with him (taken 46th in 2014). Ingram we all wanted. He is looking pretty good so far tonight. We know he's gonna be good. Randle is a double double guy. Nance tonight has impressed me. He's added a J and can rebound well. Zubac is a legit NBA big, he's a project but he also looks like he could pan out. For most of their guys, however, defense is the concern. But, they've brought in Walton, who could help in that regard, while also bringing his Warriors style play to LA.

Now, I know a lot of this because I live in So Cal. It's tough to talk to friends without hearing about the Lakers here. Their situation is pretty good, and they deserve credit. If their guys pan out (this is the biggest thing) they could be really good in 4-5 years: right as the Warriors and the cavs and the Spurs are falling off. Basically, they've timed their rebuild pretty well, and could very well be in contention by the time the current contenders fall off.
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.

you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #113 on: July 08, 2016, 11:39:56 PM »

Offline merkins

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 211
  • Tommy Points: 15
Guys what do you think about the Lakers rebuild? You have to give them credit. They've found good pieces for their team. Russell is the real deal, anyone who says otherwise is either hating on him because he's a laker or still has the phone controversy in mind. Clarkson (who isn't playing summer league) is a scorer, LA found themselves a steal with him (taken 46th in 2014). Ingram we all wanted. He is looking pretty good so far tonight. We know he's gonna be good. Randle is a double double guy. Nance tonight has impressed me. He's added a J and can rebound well. Zubac is a legit NBA big, he's a project but he also looks like he could pan out. For most of their guys, however, defense is the concern. But, they've brought in Walton, who could help in that regard, while also bringing his Warriors style play to LA.

Now, I know a lot of this because I live in So Cal. It's tough to talk to friends without hearing about the Lakers here. Their situation is pretty good, and they deserve credit. If their guys pan out (this is the biggest thing) they could be really good in 4-5 years: right as the Warriors and the cavs and the Spurs are falling off. Basically, they've timed their rebuild pretty well, and could very well be in contention by the time the current contenders fall off.

Their rebuild looks like a lot of rebuilds of other teams with high lottery picks, a lot of potential but no way to know if the pieces will come together.  For being #2 picks, Russell and Ingram are far from sure things.   Not sure I see the upside in the other guys on that roster either.

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #114 on: July 08, 2016, 11:41:46 PM »

Offline max215

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8448
  • Tommy Points: 624
How have Ingram and Hield looked?

Ingram's been great on both ends. Hield's been awful, been blocked at the rim, nothing's falling.
Isaiah, you were lightning in a bottle.

DKC Clippers

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #115 on: July 08, 2016, 11:43:04 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51955
  • Tommy Points: 3186
Guys what do you think about the Lakers rebuild? You have to give them credit. They've found good pieces for their team. Russell is the real deal, anyone who says otherwise is either hating on him because he's a laker or still has the phone controversy in mind. Clarkson (who isn't playing summer league) is a scorer, LA found themselves a steal with him (taken 46th in 2014). Ingram we all wanted. He is looking pretty good so far tonight. We know he's gonna be good. Randle is a double double guy. Nance tonight has impressed me. He's added a J and can rebound well. Zubac is a legit NBA big, he's a project but he also looks like he could pan out. For most of their guys, however, defense is the concern. But, they've brought in Walton, who could help in that regard, while also bringing his Warriors style play to LA.

Now, I know a lot of this because I live in So Cal. It's tough to talk to friends without hearing about the Lakers here. Their situation is pretty good, and they deserve credit. If their guys pan out (this is the biggest thing) they could be really good in 4-5 years: right as the Warriors and the cavs and the Spurs are falling off. Basically, they've timed their rebuild pretty well, and could very well be in contention by the time the current contenders fall off.

After watching, it wouldn't surprise me if Ingram ends up better than Simmons, especially offensively. I think Simmons won't be as much of a scorer due to being so involved in facilitating. When I've watched his summer league games, he didn't even really look to score that much.

What is encouraging is that Brown by far seems to be the most athletic out of the bunch and can easily get to the rim.
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Check out my Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Yakin_Bassin/shorts

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #116 on: July 08, 2016, 11:46:40 PM »

Offline alldaboston

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Tommy Points: 324
Guys what do you think about the Lakers rebuild? You have to give them credit. They've found good pieces for their team. Russell is the real deal, anyone who says otherwise is either hating on him because he's a laker or still has the phone controversy in mind. Clarkson (who isn't playing summer league) is a scorer, LA found themselves a steal with him (taken 46th in 2014). Ingram we all wanted. He is looking pretty good so far tonight. We know he's gonna be good. Randle is a double double guy. Nance tonight has impressed me. He's added a J and can rebound well. Zubac is a legit NBA big, he's a project but he also looks like he could pan out. For most of their guys, however, defense is the concern. But, they've brought in Walton, who could help in that regard, while also bringing his Warriors style play to LA.

Now, I know a lot of this because I live in So Cal. It's tough to talk to friends without hearing about the Lakers here. Their situation is pretty good, and they deserve credit. If their guys pan out (this is the biggest thing) they could be really good in 4-5 years: right as the Warriors and the cavs and the Spurs are falling off. Basically, they've timed their rebuild pretty well, and could very well be in contention by the time the current contenders fall off.

Their rebuild looks like a lot of rebuilds of other teams with high lottery picks, a lot of potential but no way to know if the pieces will come together.  For being #2 picks, Russell and Ingram are far from sure things.   Not sure I see the upside in the other guys on that roster either.

Perhaps.

I don't know, maybe I'm just overrating them since I hear about them so much. Most of my friends are Lakers fans, so naturally all I hear about is about their "young core", as they like to call it. And that I see them on TV with more frequency. I try not to be biased but they might have something there.
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.

you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #117 on: July 08, 2016, 11:48:14 PM »

Offline colincb

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5095
  • Tommy Points: 501
How have Ingram and Hield looked?
Good and bad, respectively.

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #118 on: July 08, 2016, 11:48:48 PM »

Offline Beat LA

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8338
  • Tommy Points: 896
  • Mr. Emoji
How have Ingram and Hield looked?

Ingram's been great on both ends. Hield's been awful, been blocked at the rim, nothing's falling.

Is his handle hurting him, or is it something else, like he's just missing shots?  I'm not currently watching.  Meh, brb, finding stream ;D.

Re: 2016 Summer League Thread
« Reply #119 on: July 08, 2016, 11:53:32 PM »

Offline alldaboston

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Tommy Points: 324
Guys what do you think about the Lakers rebuild? You have to give them credit. They've found good pieces for their team. Russell is the real deal, anyone who says otherwise is either hating on him because he's a laker or still has the phone controversy in mind. Clarkson (who isn't playing summer league) is a scorer, LA found themselves a steal with him (taken 46th in 2014). Ingram we all wanted. He is looking pretty good so far tonight. We know he's gonna be good. Randle is a double double guy. Nance tonight has impressed me. He's added a J and can rebound well. Zubac is a legit NBA big, he's a project but he also looks like he could pan out. For most of their guys, however, defense is the concern. But, they've brought in Walton, who could help in that regard, while also bringing his Warriors style play to LA.

Now, I know a lot of this because I live in So Cal. It's tough to talk to friends without hearing about the Lakers here. Their situation is pretty good, and they deserve credit. If their guys pan out (this is the biggest thing) they could be really good in 4-5 years: right as the Warriors and the cavs and the Spurs are falling off. Basically, they've timed their rebuild pretty well, and could very well be in contention by the time the current contenders fall off.

After watching, it wouldn't surprise me if Ingram ends up better than Simmons, especially offensively. I think Simmons won't be as much of a scorer due to being so involved in facilitating. When I've watched his summer league games, he didn't even really look to score that much.

What is encouraging is that Brown by far seems to be the most athletic out of the bunch and can easily get to the rim.

Yeah that's how I've felt about Simmons for some time now too. He just doesn't want to score. He wants to pass, which is fine, but it's not always the best thing for the offense at the time. Ingram can score and he's showing it tonight. He and Russell could be great in 5 years.

That is encouraging about Jaylen. He gets to the rim easily, but when he gets back from injury I want to see him get some And1s. It's one thing to get fouled a lot. But when you can convert at the rim while being fouled, that's really another thing. These guys like Russell, Ingram, Clarkson, they can score at the rim. We don't really have someone like that except Isaiah and now Al. Scoring at the rim was Marcus's selling point, but we haven't seen it due to the fact that he hasn't been on ball a lot. I hope Jaylen and Marcus both bring us that finishing at the rim ability this year.
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.

you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about