4. After rewatching some of the prospects in the 18 draft, I think the top 2 players have higher upsides than players in the 17 draft.
I see this said every year:
We have to get Wiggins...nah...Towns and Okafor are better we will get one of them next year.
We have to get Towns or Okafor...nah...Simmons and Ingram are better we will get one of them next year.
We have to get Simmons or Ingram...nah...Fultz and Ball are better we will get them next year.
We have to get Ball or Fultz...nah...two guys coming out next year are better.
And people wonder why I don't pay any attention to scouting 17 and 18 year olds
Towns and Okafor were more enticing than Wiggins because they were both Bigs and Embiid was injured. There's also not much people who are saying they preferred Simmons and Ingram over Towns. SImmons and Ingram was actually preferred by a lot last year than Ball and Fultz because both are guards and we have a ton of those.
There is definitely a tendency in our society at the moment to really rush towards the next "great thing." This can be seen in articles appearing every year with the headlines like "why next years draft will be absolutely loaded." There is a rush to declare young rookies superstars after a handful of games. A rush to call a team, like the warriors, a clear dynasty, after winning one championship. Just in the past few weeks we have had a rush to call the 76ers a future juggernaut and clear playoff team because they put together 3 weeks of good play.
It wasn't that long ago the Timberwolves were being called extremely loaded. This year it is completely unclear what they have with Dieng, Lavine, Towns and Wiggins.