Author Topic: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (20-62, #1)  (Read 448309 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1545 on: January 27, 2017, 03:13:15 PM »

Offline RockinRyA

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5572
  • Tommy Points: 699
Quote
4. After rewatching some of the prospects in the 18 draft, I think the top 2 players have higher upsides than players in the 17 draft.

I see this said every year:

We have to get Wiggins...nah...Towns and Okafor are better we will get one of them next year.
We have to get Towns or Okafor...nah...Simmons and Ingram are better we will get one of them next year.
We have to get Simmons or Ingram...nah...Fultz and Ball are better we will get them next year.
We have to get Ball or Fultz...nah...two guys coming out next year are better.

And people wonder why I don't pay any attention to scouting 17 and 18 year olds

Towns and Okafor were more enticing than Wiggins because they were both Bigs and Embiid was injured. There's also not much people who are saying they preferred Simmons and Ingram over Towns. SImmons and Ingram was actually preferred by a lot last year than Ball and Fultz because both are guards and we have a ton of those.

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1546 on: January 27, 2017, 03:26:11 PM »

Offline celticsclay

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16188
  • Tommy Points: 1407
Quote
4. After rewatching some of the prospects in the 18 draft, I think the top 2 players have higher upsides than players in the 17 draft.

I see this said every year:

We have to get Wiggins...nah...Towns and Okafor are better we will get one of them next year.
We have to get Towns or Okafor...nah...Simmons and Ingram are better we will get one of them next year.
We have to get Simmons or Ingram...nah...Fultz and Ball are better we will get them next year.
We have to get Ball or Fultz...nah...two guys coming out next year are better.

And people wonder why I don't pay any attention to scouting 17 and 18 year olds

Towns and Okafor were more enticing than Wiggins because they were both Bigs and Embiid was injured. There's also not much people who are saying they preferred Simmons and Ingram over Towns. SImmons and Ingram was actually preferred by a lot last year than Ball and Fultz because both are guards and we have a ton of those.

There is definitely a tendency in our society at the moment to really rush towards the next "great thing." This can be seen in articles appearing every year with the headlines like "why next years draft will be absolutely loaded." There is a rush to declare young rookies superstars after a handful of games. A rush to call a team, like the warriors, a clear dynasty, after winning one championship. Just in the past few weeks we have had a rush to call the 76ers a future juggernaut and clear playoff team because they put together 3 weeks of good play.

It wasn't that long ago the Timberwolves were being called extremely loaded. This year it is completely unclear what they have with Dieng, Lavine, Towns and Wiggins.


Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1547 on: January 27, 2017, 03:42:44 PM »

Offline clevelandceltic

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 583
  • Tommy Points: 30
Quote
4. After rewatching some of the prospects in the 18 draft, I think the top 2 players have higher upsides than players in the 17 draft.

I see this said every year:

We have to get Wiggins...nah...Towns and Okafor are better we will get one of them next year.
We have to get Towns or Okafor...nah...Simmons and Ingram are better we will get one of them next year.
We have to get Simmons or Ingram...nah...Fultz and Ball are better we will get them next year.
We have to get Ball or Fultz...nah...two guys coming out next year are better.

And people wonder why I don't pay any attention to scouting 17 and 18 year olds

Towns and Okafor were more enticing than Wiggins because they were both Bigs and Embiid was injured. There's also not much people who are saying they preferred Simmons and Ingram over Towns. SImmons and Ingram was actually preferred by a lot last year than Ball and Fultz because both are guards and we have a ton of those.


From my seat I would disagree with this. When I watched all three, I had Embiid about 2 notces above Towns as a prospect and about 10 above Okafor. Okafor was not even in the same league as those other two for me. Towns just brought so much to the table even as a HS junior than Okafor that I was really surprised people said Okafor would be the top pick going into the year. I think Towns deal was he played alot of face up as a HS player but Del Harris tried to get him to be a back to the basket guy when he played on the DR national team. Who knows.

If I had to rank players from 2014 - 18 on what I have seen before they became pros I would rank them as follows:
1. Embiid
2. Towns
3. Simmons
4. Ayton
5. Wiggins
6. Porter
7. Fultz
8. Parker
9. Brown

After this spot it becomes foggy. I think you could juggle 5 - 9 but for my eyes the top 4 are pretty static.

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1548 on: January 27, 2017, 03:48:32 PM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18455
  • Tommy Points: 2789
  • bammokja
no doncic? not sure how you compiled this list. please provide the methodology and stats.

thanks.
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1549 on: January 27, 2017, 03:53:04 PM »

Offline saltlover

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12490
  • Tommy Points: 2619
no doncic? not sure how you compiled this list. please provide the methodology and stats.

thanks.

He hasn't watched Doncic, and thus has a major gap.  (Not being snarky, cleveland, I just think I remember you saying that to me a day or two ago.)

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1550 on: January 27, 2017, 03:56:04 PM »

Offline clevelandceltic

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 583
  • Tommy Points: 30
no doncic? not sure how you compiled this list. please provide the methodology and stats.

thanks.

Its based on players I have seen play not stats or based on outside scouting reports. I havent seen Doncic enough to place him anywhere on a prospects list.

I can share what I thought of those players prior to being in the NBA if that helps. Also I need to change that 9 spot to Tatum and make 10 Brown

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1551 on: January 27, 2017, 04:00:16 PM »

Offline clevelandceltic

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 583
  • Tommy Points: 30
no doncic? not sure how you compiled this list. please provide the methodology and stats.

thanks.

He hasn't watched Doncic, and thus has a major gap.  (Not being snarky, cleveland, I just think I remember you saying that to me a day or two ago.)

That is absolutely correct. I have not seen enough of him to make a definitive statement on him. I have seen very small pieces of action on Doncic. From all reports he is as good as Ayton and Porter but I havent seen it so I try not to make definitive statements.

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1552 on: January 27, 2017, 04:01:47 PM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18455
  • Tommy Points: 2789
  • bammokja
no doncic? not sure how you compiled this list. please provide the methodology and stats.

thanks.

He hasn't watched Doncic, and thus has a major gap.  (Not being snarky, cleveland, I just think I remember you saying that to me a day or two ago.)

That is absolutely correct. I have not seen enough of him to make a definitive statement on him. I have seen very small pieces of action on Doncic. From all reports he is as good as Ayton and Porter but I havent seen it so I try not to make definitive statements.
fair enough. thanks for the response and a tp for you.
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1553 on: January 27, 2017, 04:03:54 PM »

Offline clevelandceltic

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 583
  • Tommy Points: 30
I guess I should qualify my list as to not confuse people. These are the prospects that I have seen on multiple levels and in multiple competitions before they arrived in the NBA. I cant speak to a guy like Duval who I have only seen once and Wendell Carter whom I have seen twice or Doncic who I have only seen snippets of.

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1554 on: January 27, 2017, 07:31:42 PM »

Offline mef730

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4789
  • Tommy Points: 1037
BKN resting or without everyone tonight. Looking forward to the Cavs breaking their streak.

I was hoping that they would play Lopez and rest him tomorrow against Minnesota.

Mike

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1555 on: January 27, 2017, 07:36:56 PM »

Offline The One

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2017
  • Tommy Points: 203
I hope Cleveland wins tonight and breaks their spirit for the rest of the season.


Was that too harsh?

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1556 on: January 27, 2017, 07:39:54 PM »

Online Phantom255x

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 38142
  • Tommy Points: 3443
  • On To Banner 19!
If the Cavaliers somehow lose this, then man, Lebron is going to throw a HUGE tantrum and probably trade guys left and right lol.
"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1557 on: January 27, 2017, 07:40:52 PM »

Offline mef730

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4789
  • Tommy Points: 1037
I hope Cleveland wins tonight and breaks their spirit for the rest of the season.


Was that too harsh?

No, not harsh enough. The correct answer is, "I hope Cleveland wins tonight and breaks their spirit for the rest of the season, as well as all of next season."

But a TP for close enough. ;)

Mike

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1558 on: January 27, 2017, 08:23:04 PM »

Offline csfansince60s

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6246
  • Tommy Points: 2239
If the Cavaliers somehow lose this, then man, Lebron is going to throw a HUGE tantrum and probably trade guys left and right lol.

TP.... that would be entertaining!

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-36, #1 on 1/25)
« Reply #1559 on: January 27, 2017, 09:18:23 PM »

Online Phantom255x

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 38142
  • Tommy Points: 3443
  • On To Banner 19!
If the Cavaliers somehow lose this, then man, Lebron is going to throw a HUGE tantrum and probably trade guys left and right lol.

TP.... that would be entertaining!

LOL, but Cavaliers up 20 so business as usual.

That being said.. they actually haven't played great today, but it's the Nets so..
"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller