It's hard for Boston to trade for Dwight.
They can't give up much of value without Dwight giving a guarantee that he will sign a new contract in the summer ... and I do not see why Dwight would do that given the lack of star talent on the Celtics roster.
Dwight Howard being a free agent this summer is a problem for Boston.
I don't think this really reflects Danny's attitude towards deals, at all. I actually suspect the two sides will discuss it in depth, if Howard becomes available.
When Ainge acquired Garnett in 2007, wouldn't he only make the deal if KG agreed to a contract extension first?
Ainge didn't want to lose those players and then see KG walk in 12 months time. That was why KG signed an extension immediately upon trade.
Am I remembering that right?
To me, very different circumstance:
1) KG was an aging vet who expressed clear displeasure with being moved to play elsewhere (which if you believe the reports, is not how Howard feels).
2) The Cs had a 'window' at that stage -- Pierce and Allen only has a few years left in the tank, and Ainge needed to know that Big Three would be complete and have every chance for those 2-4 years. This team is much younger, and it's harder to access "stars" than ever via trade.
3) The Cs are giving up less in my scenario -- there's no Al Jefferson in this deal, and no lottery picks.
Maybe I'm wrong. But in my recollection around the rumor mill over the years, Ainge has been willing to trade for guys on expiring deals in order to then convince them to stay, which the organization believes is easier to do if you have to come here first (instead of the sales pitch in FA, which has been a challenge for the Cs forever).
To a certain extent I'd imagine Ainge would LIKE the idea that Howard is on a short deal -- convince him to stay if he shows health (both mentally and physically) and productivity. If not, let him go. At least, if they make an ECF with Howard and he walks, they'll be one step closer to showing other FAs they're ready to 'win now'.