Author Topic: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?  (Read 7196 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #30 on: October 19, 2015, 11:32:12 PM »

Offline MJohnnyboy

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2438
  • Tommy Points: 269
In all honestly, I'm not sure Danny would have given the Max to Harris.

It's a very risky move given Harris' play up to this point.  On one hand he has shown some promise and is still very young.  On the other hand, he looks to me like the textbook example of a "decent numbers on a crappy team" guy.

I agree with that notion about Harris but I'm very high on Orlando's youth movement so I think this year we'll get a glimpse of what Harris truly is.

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #31 on: October 19, 2015, 11:49:18 PM »

Offline chambers

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7483
  • Tommy Points: 943
  • Boston Celtics= Championships, nothing less.
No, like Eja said, I'd rather just try and re-sign Sully to a cheaper deal after his minutes are reduced this season. Sully's a better passer and just as a good a rebounder if used similarly to Thompson.
Thompson's unsung skill is defending pick and rolls as the big where he does a decent job but he's just way overpaid at the max.

If Ainge won't pay Tobias Harris or Khris Middleton the max, then there's no way in hell he'd pay Tristan Thompson the max.
The offer they gave him in the first place was way too much, and they just wanted to keep team chemistry/Lebron happy. Thompson's scumbag agent knew this and thought they could wrestle another few million out of the Cavs but they've stood their ground. Good for them too.

Anyway, I'd rather sign Sully to a 4 year deal like Crowder's with a team option after the 2nd season. Something like 4 years 32 million or something and see if he can grow up a bit as he hits 25 years old. He'd be a solid bench rebounding big man and a few more seasons of working on his three point shot he could be a great value contract.

The fact that we've got Mickey locked up long term also makes this easy decision even easier.

Anyway...sign Thompson to the max?
To me it's a 'hell no'.

I agree with all your comments here except for the part in bold, because indications are that Ainge probably was willing to pay Harris the max, but Orlando wasn't going to let that happen.  After Orlando lost on the Millsap bidding, they turned around and indicated that they would match any offer on Harris and, indeed, ended up giving him a max contract.  'Nothing Danny could do there, no matter how much he may have wanted him.

I seemed to remember that Danny offered him close to the max but wouldn't go further...I may be way off.
Perhaps it was my preconceived thought that Danny would only sign 'iffy' guys like Harris if he thought he was getting a potential bargain and there was no offer sheet given to Harris by us. Basically if we were attempting to sign Harris then at least an offer sheet would've been put out there even if the Magic said they'd match anything.

But yeah you could be completely right.
Regardless Tobias Harris was a fairly 'iffy' max contract target and he's a helluva better player than Tristan Thompson both now and potential wise.
So Thompson to the Celtics would basically never happen which most of us would tend to agree on.
"We are lucky we have a very patient GM that isn't willing to settle for being good and coming close. He wants to win a championship and we have the potential to get there still with our roster and assets."

quoting 'Greg B' on RealGM after 2017 trade deadline.
Read that last line again. One more time.

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #32 on: October 20, 2015, 09:50:55 AM »

Offline mmmmm

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5308
  • Tommy Points: 862
No, like Eja said, I'd rather just try and re-sign Sully to a cheaper deal after his minutes are reduced this season. Sully's a better passer and just as a good a rebounder if used similarly to Thompson.
Thompson's unsung skill is defending pick and rolls as the big where he does a decent job but he's just way overpaid at the max.

If Ainge won't pay Tobias Harris or Khris Middleton the max, then there's no way in hell he'd pay Tristan Thompson the max.
The offer they gave him in the first place was way too much, and they just wanted to keep team chemistry/Lebron happy. Thompson's scumbag agent knew this and thought they could wrestle another few million out of the Cavs but they've stood their ground. Good for them too.

Anyway, I'd rather sign Sully to a 4 year deal like Crowder's with a team option after the 2nd season. Something like 4 years 32 million or something and see if he can grow up a bit as he hits 25 years old. He'd be a solid bench rebounding big man and a few more seasons of working on his three point shot he could be a great value contract.

The fact that we've got Mickey locked up long term also makes this easy decision even easier.

Anyway...sign Thompson to the max?
To me it's a 'hell no'.

I agree with all your comments here except for the part in bold, because indications are that Ainge probably was willing to pay Harris the max, but Orlando wasn't going to let that happen.  After Orlando lost on the Millsap bidding, they turned around and indicated that they would match any offer on Harris and, indeed, ended up giving him a max contract.  'Nothing Danny could do there, no matter how much he may have wanted him.

I seemed to remember that Danny offered him close to the max but wouldn't go further...I may be way off.
Perhaps it was my preconceived thought that Danny would only sign 'iffy' guys like Harris if he thought he was getting a potential bargain and there was no offer sheet given to Harris by us. Basically if we were attempting to sign Harris then at least an offer sheet would've been put out there even if the Magic said they'd match anything.

But yeah you could be completely right.
Regardless Tobias Harris was a fairly 'iffy' max contract target and he's a helluva better player than Tristan Thompson both now and potential wise.
So Thompson to the Celtics would basically never happen which most of us would tend to agree on.

The rumor train went roughly as follows:

1) Orlando was going after Millsap, so they were not going to match on Harris (because of cap space).  This made a lot of financial sense since they had two younger SFs that they drafted with high picks in the last two drafts.
2) So Danny was going aggressively after Harris and was rumored (as you note) to have unofficially offered a 'near max' offer (note - not yet an actual offer sheet).
3) Orlando lost out on Millsap and turned their attention towards retaining Harris.  This now also made sense because he represents a potentially tradable asset down the road.  They let it be known that they would match any offer.
4) Danny backed away.   The problem with trying to 'call their bluff' by making an actual offer sheet is that it ties up cap space while waiting to find out if the other team will match.
5) Orlando went ahead and tied up Harris with a max contract.  This will probably look like a reasonably cost-effective contract under the new cap so even if he ends up redundant with Gordon & Hezonja, he should be easy to trade (available for trade as of mid-december).

Danny then seemed to express a lot of interest in Danilo Galinari, but he, too, ended up getting retained by his team (signed a two year extension, through 2018, final year a team-option).

When you add those two events to how hard he was apparently going after Justice Winslow in the draft, it would seem Danny was pushing hard towards getting a stud SF.

As I noted up above, Harris will be eligible for trade as of mid-December.  It will be interesting to see if Orlando is truly committed to him long term or if he gets moved and if Danny shows any interest.   Or, do they move one of Gordon/Hezonja?

EDIT:  To clarify a bit more on the offer sheet issue -- To make an offer sheet ties up cap space, which means you have to HAVE the cap space, so for Danny to have made an offer to Harris would have required him to first clear some space, which would have forced him to make a renouncement or two before he really wanted and before he was certain he would get Harris.  So an offer sheet was only going to happen if he was 100% certain that he was going to get Harris and that Orlando wasn't going to match (which would have been the case only if they got Millsap).  So that's why you didn't see an actual offer sheet publicized during all that.

As far as, "if he thought he was getting a potential bargain", a bargain is, of course a relative thing, but a max contract for Harris was/is only 16M.   That's 23% of the current cap, but would only be 17.8% of next year's probable cap and an even smaller percentage of where it likely will be the season after that. 
« Last Edit: October 20, 2015, 10:28:51 AM by mmmmm »
NBA Officiating - Corrupt?  Incompetent?  Which is worse?  Does it matter?  It sucks.

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #33 on: October 20, 2015, 10:00:14 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
No way, too limited of a player for that even with the cap increasing. Not to mention our roster isn't in the sort of shape were you look to add that sort of piece over bigger moves.

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #34 on: October 20, 2015, 10:02:23 AM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
No thanks.

Thompson isn't getting the offers hes getting, simply because he isn't worth that much money, and he knows it.
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #35 on: October 20, 2015, 10:14:21 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
No thanks.

Thompson isn't getting the offers hes getting, simply because he isn't worth that much money, and he knows it.
Well at this point only two teams could even offer him a deal. RFA really hurts a players leverage.

But I agree that the Cavs offer is as good as he'd get even if he wasn't a RFA in all odds.

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #36 on: October 20, 2015, 10:32:13 AM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32761
  • Tommy Points: 1732
  • What a Pub Should Be
No way, too limited of a player for that even with the cap increasing. Not to mention our roster isn't in the sort of shape were you look to add that sort of piece over bigger moves.

Agreed.  You look to add TT when you're much closer to completing the puzzle.  Celtics aren't there yet.  Not to mention throwing that amount of money around at his aforementioned limitations.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #37 on: October 21, 2015, 07:29:48 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13756
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
Looks like the Cavs and Thompson have finally come to an agreement. I am glad we didn't have to find out if Danny would have signed him for more.

http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/13942794/cleveland-cavaliers-tristan-thompson-agree-5-year-82-million-deal

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #38 on: October 21, 2015, 07:38:35 PM »

Offline Rondo9

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5379
  • Tommy Points: 277
82 million?! That's a lot for a limited player.

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #39 on: October 21, 2015, 07:58:55 PM »

Offline bdm860

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6138
  • Tommy Points: 4624
Disappointed the Cavs caved and help him and his agent save face with the extra $2m.  I was enjoying watching that play out, and was really hoping for a Latrell Sprewell or Bonzi Wells type situation. 

Was hoping the Cavs had pulled their $80m/5yr offer and instead would only offer him $60m/5yr now, really play hard ball.  Then after sitting out all year, have no team offer him anything over $50m in the summer of '16, only to have the Cavs lower their offer yet again.

What can I say, I'm one of those people who just likes to watch the world burn.

After 18 months with their Bigs, the Littles were: 46% less likely to use illegal drugs, 27% less likely to use alcohol, 52% less likely to skip school, 37% less likely to skip a class

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #40 on: October 21, 2015, 08:11:25 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13756
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
Disappointed the Cavs caved and help him and his agent save face with the extra $2m.  I was enjoying watching that play out, and was really hoping for a Latrell Sprewell or Bonzi Wells type situation. 

Was hoping the Cavs had pulled their $80m/5yr offer and instead would only offer him $60m/5yr now, really play hard ball.  Then after sitting out all year, have no team offer him anything over $50m in the summer of '16, only to have the Cavs lower their offer yet again.

What can I say, I'm one of those people who just likes to watch the world burn.

Yeah, he had a lot of nerve declining the initial offer, but I guess it was the right decision, afterall. Who knows, maybe Thompson will turn into a star...it doesn't seem likely, though.

Regardless, he will help the Cavs with their championship aspirations and that is all that really matters to them (and why they caved).

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #41 on: October 21, 2015, 09:49:59 PM »

Offline ImShakHeIsShaq

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7739
  • Tommy Points: 804
Disappointed the Cavs caved and help him and his agent save face with the extra $2m.  I was enjoying watching that play out, and was really hoping for a Latrell Sprewell or Bonzi Wells type situation. 

Was hoping the Cavs had pulled their $80m/5yr offer and instead would only offer him $60m/5yr now, really play hard ball.  Then after sitting out all year, have no team offer him anything over $50m in the summer of '16, only to have the Cavs lower their offer yet again.

What can I say, I'm one of those people who just likes to watch the world burn.

Yeah, he had a lot of nerve declining the initial offer, but I guess it was the right decision, afterall. Who knows, maybe Thompson will turn into a star...it doesn't seem likely, though.

Regardless, he will help the Cavs with their championship aspirations and that is all that really matters to them (and why they caved).

They caved b/c of LBJ, I don't think they think he is as important to winning it all as he and LBJ thinks. If it wasn't about giving LBJ what he wants and keeping him happy, TT would probably be traded and/or paid less. Not saying they don't think he is solid and that he didn't help them a lot in the playoffs, just saying they probably don't think his production is irreplaceable and that they couldn't get similar production at a cheaper price.
It takes me 3hrs to get to Miami and 1hr to get to Orlando... but I *SPIT* on their NBA teams! "Bless God and bless the (Celts)"-Lady GaGa (she said gays but she really meant Celts)

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #42 on: October 21, 2015, 09:55:44 PM »

Offline crimson_stallion

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5964
  • Tommy Points: 875
Looks like the Cavs and Thompson have finally come to an agreement. I am glad we didn't have to find out if Danny would have signed him for more.

http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/13942794/cleveland-cavaliers-tristan-thompson-agree-5-year-82-million-deal

So Cleveland has something like a $45m (about half the cap) invested in Love, Thompson and Varejao over the next 3 years?

Throw in a combined $50m for Lebron, Kyrie and Shumpert.

Given the injury history of Love, Varejao, Kyrie and Shumpert they really are making a big gamble.

I can only imagine that this will also make it hard for them to re-sign Mozgov...I can't imagine he would accept anything less than $10m a year.   

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #43 on: October 22, 2015, 08:41:36 AM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34677
  • Tommy Points: 1603
The Cavs signed him because Mozgov is still injured, Love is coming back from surgery (and injured a lot), and Varejao is made of glass.  They need a guy that they can count on for 30 minutes a game for 82 games down low.  That and he is one of the best offensive rebounders in the game, is close with James, is always in shape, plays within the system, is generally well liked, etc.  The Cavs gave him an extra 2 million and let him save face because they want to keep everyone happy and it was dollars they would have spent the whole time anyway.  Thompson just needed to come into the reality that he wasn't getting a full max of over 90 million.  Once that happened it was just a matter of time.
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: Would you sign and trade for T. Thompson at full 4 year max?
« Reply #44 on: October 22, 2015, 09:37:46 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20105
  • Tommy Points: 1331
No, I would not. 

At the end of the day, I think the Cavs overpaid, I think they did what LeBron told them to do.   I could see them moving Love at some point.  I hope not here.

Quote
So Cleveland has something like a $45m (about half the cap) invested in Love, Thompson and Varejao over the next 3 years?

Throw in a combined $50m for Lebron, Kyrie and Shumpert.

Given the injury history of Love, Varejao, Kyrie and Shumpert they really are making a big gamble.
This team will have some of the same problems that past team have had.   No flexibility.