In June's [2015] NBA Draft, Jordan -- using his power as owner of the Charlotte Hornets -- turned down the Celtics' offer of four first-round picks to move up to the Hornets' No. 9 spot, Grantland's Zach Lowe reported. Boston's desire was to draft Duke forward Justice Winslow -- who went a few picks later to Miami -- but Jordan was dead set on Charlotte using the pick to draft Wisconsin big man Frank Kaminsky.
I think there are a few things that are truths in this debate over Ainge vs. Stevens drafting/trading. Ainge has a much bigger sample size and much wider range of where the picks were taken. He also had a very wide range of results. From Fab Melo (one of the worst picks in Celtics' history), to trading the #1 to PHI in 2017 for the #3 and a first in 2018 (via LAL). In typical Ainge form, he killed it with picking Tatum but then picked Romeo Langford with the other pick. That is Ainge, some big wins, but a lot of misses along the way also. Not unlike most GMs. Overall, it seems his big wins overshadow his misses and near misses (Michael Jordan saved him from making one of the worst trades imaginable). But in the end, his net was pretty good.
Stevens just does not have enough sample size yet. The recent play of Walsh (#38), Scheierman (#30), and Hugo (#28) is certainly providing some vindication of those picks. They were late picks that have developed into useful players. Hugo Gonzalez in particular may turn out to be an absolute steal. And I remain high on Amari Williams (#46). The book is not nearly closed on him. I don't know how you can't grade Stevens high on these picks. He also picked JD Davison at #53 and he is still hanging around the NBA which is not bad for a player taken that late.