Author Topic: Why Mickey isn't signed yet  (Read 26648 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« on: July 17, 2015, 01:46:53 PM »

Offline TA9

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2712
  • Tommy Points: 118
  • I Bleed Green
Quote
According to sources, the Celtics were offering the No. 33 overall selection a four-year deal — two years guaranteed and two more at the team’s option — that was the richest given a second-round pick. League sources here at the summer league said Mickey was looking for a shorter-term commitment and, when it appeared neither side would move, the 6-8 forward was prepared to sign the tender offer — a one-year, non-guaranteed rookie minimum of $525,093. Players who sign such deals become restricted free agents at the end of the season.
– via Boston Herald

Kind of resemblance to the situation between K.J. McDaniels and the 76ers last year.
So did we just draft a money grabber? Seems like Mickey is more interested in money than playing for our team ::)
Jack of all trades, master of none.

Re: Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2015, 01:50:58 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
I would not sign a one year deal, let him look for job elsewhere and us retain his rights. We don't need him this year as it is considering the depth.

Re: Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2015, 01:54:51 PM »

Offline merkins

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 211
  • Tommy Points: 15
Four years is a long time for what he must feel is short money.  Yes he is a second round pick but that's not a very favorable deal for him if he's confident he can play at the NBA level.  Hopefully they work out a compromise as I'd hate to lose any rook after year 1 if they can play.

Re: Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2015, 01:57:08 PM »

Offline Yoki_IsTheName

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11134
  • Tommy Points: 1304
  • I'm a Paul Heyman guy.
I would not sign a one year deal, let him look for job elsewhere and us retain his rights. We don't need him this year as it is considering the depth.

This.

I'd renogotiate and do a 3 year deal, otherwise I'd just not sign him. We have his rights, he's not going to be on any NBA team but us. So if he won't accept a 3 year deal, then he's going to play either in the D - League or overseas. I'm pretty sure he'd rather be in the NBA.

2019 CStrong Historical Draft 2000s OKC Thunder.
PG: Jrue Holiday / Isaiah Thomas / Larry Hughes
SG: Paul George / Aaron McKie / Bradley Beal
SF: Paul Pierce / Tayshaun Prince / Brian Scalabrine
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge / Shareef Abdur-Raheem / Ben Simmons
C: Jermaine O'neal / Ben Wallace

Re: Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2015, 01:57:38 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Four years is a long time for what he must feel is short money.  Yes he is a second round pick but that's not a very favorable deal for him if he's confident he can play at the NBA level.  Hopefully they work out a compromise as I'd hate to lose any rook after year 1 if they can play.

He's basically offering him what a 1st rounder with guaranteed money gets. Though I would think that a 3-year deal is also on the table, so I wouldn't focus on the 4-year option by it lonesome.

A two year deal, while not ideal, it's workable. But a one year deal would be foolish.

Re: Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2015, 02:01:01 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
I would not sign a one year deal, let him look for job elsewhere and us retain his rights. We don't need him this year as it is considering the depth.

This.

I'd renogotiate and do a 3 year deal, otherwise I'd just not sign him. We have his rights, he's not going to be on any NBA team but us. So if he won't accept a 3 year deal, then he's going to play either in the D - League or oversees. I'm pretty sure he'd rsthe be in the NBA.

He can sign the tender offer for one year.  If you don't offer him a tender, then you lose his rights and he can become a free agent before the season starts.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« Reply #6 on: July 17, 2015, 02:02:34 PM »

Offline Yoki_IsTheName

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11134
  • Tommy Points: 1304
  • I'm a Paul Heyman guy.
I would not sign a one year deal, let him look for job elsewhere and us retain his rights. We don't need him this year as it is considering the depth.

This.

I'd renogotiate and do a 3 year deal, otherwise I'd just not sign him. We have his rights, he's not going to be on any NBA team but us. So if he won't accept a 3 year deal, then he's going to play either in the D - League or oversees. I'm pretty sure he'd rsthe be in the NBA.

He can sign the tender offer for one year.  If you don't offer him a tender, then you lose his rights and he can become a free agent before the season starts.

Okay... That I didn't know.
2019 CStrong Historical Draft 2000s OKC Thunder.
PG: Jrue Holiday / Isaiah Thomas / Larry Hughes
SG: Paul George / Aaron McKie / Bradley Beal
SF: Paul Pierce / Tayshaun Prince / Brian Scalabrine
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge / Shareef Abdur-Raheem / Ben Simmons
C: Jermaine O'neal / Ben Wallace

Re: Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2015, 02:03:23 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
I would not sign a one year deal, let him look for job elsewhere and us retain his rights. We don't need him this year as it is considering the depth.

This.

I'd renogotiate and do a 3 year deal, otherwise I'd just not sign him. We have his rights, he's not going to be on any NBA team but us. So if he won't accept a 3 year deal, then he's going to play either in the D - League or oversees. I'm pretty sure he'd rsthe be in the NBA.

He can sign the tender offer for one year.  If you don't offer him a tender, then you lose his rights and he can become a free agent before the season starts.

Oh? I wasn't aware of that. That sucks, oh well... hope for the best. I doubt it'll get to that.

Looks with the increasing salary cap that retaining 2nd rounders might become more difficult than before.

Re: Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« Reply #8 on: July 17, 2015, 02:10:56 PM »

Offline TheTruthFot18

  • NCE
  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2125
  • Tommy Points: 263
  • Truth Juice
I would not sign a one year deal, let him look for job elsewhere and us retain his rights. We don't need him this year as it is considering the depth.

This.

I'd renogotiate and do a 3 year deal, otherwise I'd just not sign him. We have his rights, he's not going to be on any NBA team but us. So if he won't accept a 3 year deal, then he's going to play either in the D - League or oversees. I'm pretty sure he'd rsthe be in the NBA.

He can sign the tender offer for one year.  If you don't offer him a tender, then you lose his rights and he can become a free agent before the season starts.

Oh? I wasn't aware of that. That sucks, oh well... hope for the best. I doubt it'll get to that.

Looks with the increasing salary cap that retaining 2nd rounders might become more difficult than before.

He's not a franchise changer but I hope we don't lose him over this. I realized KJ Mcdaniels did the same thing. Why do these guys do this? Do they think someone will offer them big money after a rookie year likely split between the D League and the end of a bench?
The Nets will finish with the worst record and the Celtics will end up with the 4th pick.

- Me (sometime in January)

--------------------------------------------------------

Guess I was wrong (May 23rd)

Re: Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« Reply #9 on: July 17, 2015, 02:12:51 PM »

Offline CelticSooner

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11884
  • Tommy Points: 902
  • GOT IT!!!
He's barely going to play this season. Better to take that 4 year deal and guarantee some money than risk the restricted market after the season. Sounds to me he doesn't like where he landed and wants to avoid the D league if possible.

Re: Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« Reply #10 on: July 17, 2015, 02:14:19 PM »

Offline tarheelsxxiii

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8593
  • Tommy Points: 1389
He's barely going to play this season. Better to take that 4 year deal and guarantee some money than risk the restricted market after the season. Sounds to me he doesn't like where he landed and wants to avoid the D league if possible.

I agree, that's probably the most likely. Or perhaps he has a lot (too much?) confidence in himself.
The Tarstradamus Group, LLC

Re: Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« Reply #11 on: July 17, 2015, 02:27:32 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20099
  • Tommy Points: 1331
Because Ainge is still working the phones, so we can have maximum flexibility.   Recall, one can go over the cap to sign our own guys.   Lee deal is not final yet, either.

Re: Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« Reply #12 on: July 17, 2015, 02:27:57 PM »

Offline TA9

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2712
  • Tommy Points: 118
  • I Bleed Green
I would not sign a one year deal, let him look for job elsewhere and us retain his rights. We don't need him this year as it is considering the depth.

This.

I'd renogotiate and do a 3 year deal, otherwise I'd just not sign him. We have his rights, he's not going to be on any NBA team but us. So if he won't accept a 3 year deal, then he's going to play either in the D - League or oversees. I'm pretty sure he'd rsthe be in the NBA.

He can sign the tender offer for one year.  If you don't offer him a tender, then you lose his rights and he can become a free agent before the season starts.

Oh? I wasn't aware of that. That sucks, oh well... hope for the best. I doubt it'll get to that.

Looks with the increasing salary cap that retaining 2nd rounders might become more difficult than before.

He's not a franchise changer but I hope we don't lose him over this. I realized KJ Mcdaniels did the same thing. Why do these guys do this? Do they think someone will offer them big money after a rookie year likely split between the D League and the end of a bench?
Maybe he got inspired by K.J. McDaniels ::)?
K.J. had a pretty good season last year with the 76ers (he barely played with the Rockets) and the rumor has it that the Rockets are considering to offer him the full MLE:
Quote
Calvin Watkins: Rockets want to use $5.4 mil MLE on KJ McDaniels are in talks with him. McDaniels has a strong offer from 1 other team. No offer sheet yet. KJ McDaniels is currently back in school at Clemson working on getting his degree.
It seems to have worked out well for McDaniels but I doubt that Mickey will have the same impact on the C's given that our frontline is pretty stacked. Some people are so ungrateful... Take the millions and take a seat on the bench Mickey...
Jack of all trades, master of none.

Re: Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« Reply #13 on: July 17, 2015, 02:30:53 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Because Ainge is still working the phones, so we can have maximum flexibility.   Recall, one can go over the cap to sign our own guys.   Lee deal is not final yet, either.

You're missing the gist of all of this. The only we we can sign Mickey to a long contract (3+ years, gain his Bird Rights) is by using cap space. And since using cap space is needed, this is not about retaining flexibility at all, but on negotiations on an agreement not happening yet.

There's a slim chance that Ainge would find a deal so good he would forgo going after Mickey for 3+ years, but I don't see it. I think he'd rather lock-up Mickey and move on. His base salary shouldn't be that much anyways, under $1M for sure.

But we'll see.

Re: Why Mickey isn't signed yet
« Reply #14 on: July 17, 2015, 02:33:32 PM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
Yeah, as other have pointed out, this seems like a dumb move. He isn't going to play here, so I don't know what he hopes to accomplish by not taking s long deal. If he signs a one year deal, his best case would be to latch onto another team in 2016-2017 at another minimum deal (because no one will offer him more than that no matter how well he performs in the D-League or next year's summer league) and then hope to blow up year two and then get a big deal year 3. But that seems like a lot to risk when Ainge seems to be offering s pretty good deal.