He is just a better player on offense........nothing more to that......If you watch basketball and know the game you see it.
Just like Elfrid Payton is a better offensive player. Trey Burke's offensive game may be terrible in shooting departments but he can create better and get shots off better.
Marcus Smart is limited on offense, and all it takes is 5 games to see that.
Ah, the old "if you watch basketball" argument. Last refuge of the logically bankrupt.
The point is not to make fun of.
Their are certain things you can see when you watch a player. It is that simple.
When you watch Marcus Smart your scared that all he will do is shoot 3's for the entire game...when he goes to the basket you know he is getting rejected. He can't dribble. He cannot create a shot for himself which is basically suicide for a Guard player trying to start in the NBA.
I dont watch enough Utah Jazz to be able to make a really good statement on this, but from what Ive seen, Burke is not an offensive power house by any means. Looking at his stats Smart took 4 3s per game at 33.5% and took 7 overall shots including 2 free throws. His total fg% was a pretty awful 37%.
As for Burke. He took 5 3s per game (thats right thats more 3s per game) at 31.8% and took 14 overall shots at an equally awful 37%. He also got to the line 2x per game.
Statistically they seem pretty similar the only difference is that Burke shoots way more and gets more assists. This would make sense as he was given a larger role in the offense.
I dont understand how you have time to watch the whole NBA but good for you. Im left with the handful of games that the C's play a team and what I remember from college then highlight packages which dont tell 1/2 the story. Stats are a good fallback in situations like these, but I agree the eye test is most valuable.