Who Wins More: Celts or Kings?

[littleteapot]

Karl is definitely a better in-game coach, but the whole situation with Karl (like the whole situation with Cousins and the whole situation with name the person associated with the kings) looks a repeat of Bobby V on the Sox.

I'd rather have a very talented coach who lacks experience but is actually cooperating with the players and the front office to give everyone the best chance to succeed.

[dreamgreen]

Celtics. I can say with relative certainty that at some point this season the Kings locker room will descend into utter chaos and the organization will collapse in on itself like a dying star.

Agreed, that team should be a reality TV show = train wreck in the making.

[fantankerous]

It's possible the Celtics' locker room has more drama than the Kings'.  Too many players playing for their next contract.  Add in the frustration when they realize they overachieved last year and can't replicate the success this season.  It could get ugly.

[GC003332]

It's possible the Celtics' locker room has more drama than the Kings'.  Too many players playing for their next contract.  Add in the frustration when they realize they overachieved last year and can't replicate the success this season.  It could get ugly.

I agree , if Sullinger sees his minutes being eaten away I can't imagine him being a happy camper, probably ask out after not long.

[D.o.s.]

We have one of the best coaches in the league.  That's all the confidence I need to say Celtics will definitely have a better record.

You think Brad Stevens is a better coach than George Karl?

Why?

For starters, maybe because he doesn't go into warrs with his own players and try to get them shipped out of town?

For the sake of your argument: We don't know that isn't why Rondo and Green were moved.

However I was thinking more of the on-the-court aspects of coaching.