Author Topic: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick  (Read 18055 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick
« Reply #60 on: June 26, 2015, 02:35:09 PM »

Offline Chief Macho

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1247
  • Tommy Points: 84
Would I rather have the Celts 4 drafted players and two players in the 10-20 range next year or Kaminsky or Winslow.   Well, I'd rather have Kaminsky or Winslow.   

Re: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick
« Reply #61 on: June 26, 2015, 02:38:25 PM »

Offline cltc5

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7176
  • Tommy Points: 463
And if we didn't make the playoffs, we wouldn't have needed to offer any

Shhhhh....  Reality is like a 4 letter word to some people in here.   ;D

So ?darn true.  But hey look at all the proud celtics fans this morning vindicated for making the playoffs ::)

The irony that the thing that stood in the way of us getting a 9th pick was some guy named the tank!

Re: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick
« Reply #62 on: June 26, 2015, 02:47:58 PM »

Offline clappy

  • Jordan Walsh
  • Posts: 22
  • Tommy Points: 4
Whats crazy is that this is just what we offered. Just imagine what they were actually asking for the pick.

Re: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick
« Reply #63 on: June 26, 2015, 02:47:58 PM »

Offline MBunge

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Tommy Points: 471
Wouldn't we be happier to have Winslow in hand today as opposed to a handful of potential rotation players?

They didn't take Winslow.  They took Kaminsky.

I sincerely hope the people ripping Ainge for grabbing Rozier at #16 aren't also the people arguing that Frank Kaminsky is worth multiple first round picks.  Anyone want to bet $10 that when/if Kaminsky gets traded, Charlotte will be lucky to get even one first for him?

Mike

Re: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick
« Reply #64 on: June 26, 2015, 03:58:56 PM »

Offline Waew

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 775
  • Tommy Points: 50
ESPN is saying Danny offered SIX picks, including 4 first rounders in an offer to hornets for #9.

Re: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick
« Reply #65 on: June 26, 2015, 04:02:21 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Wouldn't we be happier to have Winslow in hand today as opposed to a handful of potential rotation players?

They didn't take Winslow.  They took Kaminsky.

I sincerely hope the people ripping Ainge for grabbing Rozier at #16 aren't also the people arguing that Frank Kaminsky is worth multiple first round picks.  Anyone want to bet $10 that when/if Kaminsky gets traded, Charlotte will be lucky to get even one first for him?

Mike

Yes, but clearly in their estimation Kaminsky was more valuable than Winslow.  The point is, they chose the quality talent over the quantity of picks.

Considering that my favorite team is in a purgatory defined by an abundance of quantity and a total dearth of quality, I cannot blame them.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick
« Reply #66 on: June 26, 2015, 04:05:19 PM »

Offline saltlover

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12490
  • Tommy Points: 2619
ESPN is saying Danny offered SIX picks, including 4 first rounders in an offer to hornets for #9.

It said up to 4 1sts and 6 picks, so probably:

The two firsts this year
Either our own or Dallas's pick next year (top 7 protected)
Minny pick (top 12 protrcted 1st in 2016, or 2016-2017 2nds)
And another second

Essentially that was this year's pick, the pick from Doc, the picks from Rondo, and another 2nd.  I can't fault Danny for not getting that trade done because Michael Jordan is crazy.  You know Cho wanted to pull the trigger.

Re: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick
« Reply #67 on: June 26, 2015, 04:05:44 PM »

Offline Rondo9

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5379
  • Tommy Points: 277
Wouldn't we be happier to have Winslow in hand today as opposed to a handful of potential rotation players?

They didn't take Winslow.  They took Kaminsky.

I sincerely hope the people ripping Ainge for grabbing Rozier at #16 aren't also the people arguing that Frank Kaminsky is worth multiple first round picks.  Anyone want to bet $10 that when/if Kaminsky gets traded, Charlotte will be lucky to get even one first for him?

Mike

Yes, but clearly in their estimation Kaminsky was more valuable than Winslow.  The point is, they chose the quality talent over the quantity of picks.

Considering that my favorite team is in a purgatory defined by an abundance of quantity and a total dearth of quality, I cannot blame them.

It's only purgatory if you don't have flexibility. Do people even know what kind of draft picks Anige was offering?

Re: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick
« Reply #68 on: June 26, 2015, 04:28:20 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13770
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
This is something to be worried about with Ainge. Rarely does he ever make a trade and you think, 'wow, he really got screwed on that one.' It is almost always the opposite. Inexperienced gms (like Jordan) may just be afraid to trade with Ainge thinking they are going make a terrible blunder.

Winslow was clearly the choice at #9, but pretend we had the 9th pick and we were ready to take Kaminsky, would anybody here be all that upset that we trade the pick for four firsts and decent 2nd rounders? We would be hailing Ainge once again. Jordan obviously overthought this one.

Re: Toscana Tweet RE: Terms of Charlotte Rejected Trade
« Reply #69 on: June 26, 2015, 04:28:24 PM »

Offline mctyson

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5087
  • Tommy Points: 372
If they turned that down, I'm glad Danny stopped negotiating.  Any more than that would be an awful deal

This helps.

Still weird to draft Rozier at #16, but this set on info helps me get over it a little quicker.

People keep stating this like it is some fact that Rozier would have been available at 28.  It is not weird.  Danny Ainge rated him really highly, he was available, and he picked him.  There is nothing weird about that.


Re: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick
« Reply #70 on: June 26, 2015, 04:31:23 PM »

Offline mctyson

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5087
  • Tommy Points: 372
ESPN is saying Danny offered SIX picks, including 4 first rounders in an offer to hornets for #9.

If Charlotte turned down that to slide down 7 spots...MJ is an idiot.

Re: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick
« Reply #71 on: June 26, 2015, 05:23:20 PM »

Offline Scintan

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3066
  • Tommy Points: 656
ESPN is saying Danny offered SIX picks, including 4 first rounders in an offer to hornets for #9.

If Charlotte turned down that to slide down 7 spots...MJ is an idiot.

Which would you rather have:

Rookie Paul Pierce

or

#16 pick
#28 pick
#12-20 pick next year
Lottery protected pick next year or multiple second round picks

?


Nobody here with a logical brain would pass on the Pierce option.  Everyone belittling Charlotte is being a hypocrite, because they wouldn't have made the trade if they were in the position to make that pick and take Winslow/"Pierce".


When people are free to do as they please, they usually imitate each other.

Re: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick
« Reply #72 on: June 26, 2015, 05:25:04 PM »

Offline BlackCeltic

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 865
  • Tommy Points: 64
Is WInslow worth 6 picks that Ainge is rumored to have offered? I rather trade that for a current, bonafied star.

Re: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick
« Reply #73 on: June 26, 2015, 05:29:07 PM »

Offline Rondo9

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5379
  • Tommy Points: 277
ESPN is saying Danny offered SIX picks, including 4 first rounders in an offer to hornets for #9.

If Charlotte turned down that to slide down 7 spots...MJ is an idiot.

Which would you rather have:

Rookie Paul Pierce

or

#16 pick
#28 pick
#12-20 pick next year
Lottery protected pick next year or multiple second round picks

?


Nobody here with a logical brain would pass on the Pierce option.  Everyone belittling Charlotte is being a hypocrite, because they wouldn't have made the trade if they were in the position to make that pick and take Winslow/"Pierce".

But Charlotte drafted Frank

Re: Ainge's Offer for the 9th Pick
« Reply #74 on: June 26, 2015, 05:29:12 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32360
  • Tommy Points: 10099
ESPN is saying Danny offered SIX picks, including 4 first rounders in an offer to hornets for #9.

If Charlotte turned down that to slide down 7 spots...MJ is an idiot.

Which would you rather have:

Rookie Paul Pierce

or

#16 pick
#28 pick
#12-20 pick next year
Lottery protected pick next year or multiple second round picks

?


Nobody here with a logical brain would pass on the Pierce option.  Everyone belittling Charlotte is being a hypocrite, because they wouldn't have made the trade if they were in the position to make that pick and take Winslow/"Pierce".
nobody here with a logical brain would believe Winslow is the next Paul Pierce