Well I just got back home from the draft. We passed on Portis. That is all I can say. After that pick, I was scrolling bleacher report hoping for a trade. It never happened.
ha, ha, ha...that is quite the signature you have there. placed into a single passage you have:
- created an obnoxious visual effect
- a statement that has people questioning your math abilities
- an assertion that is premature, unproven, and a rush to judgement
- confirmation that ainge is a very good drafter in the later part of the draft
- demonstration that you may not be aware that trades involve more than one side
- a rush to conclude that today equals tomorrow (no trade now must mean no trade in the future)
- finishes with a demand that ainge start drafting based upon need, not the bpa; a violation of a fundamental draft strategy.
- to your credit, at least one or two of your assertions are accurate.
ha, ha....that is one busy as hell signature. i am not sure i have ever seen so many questionable statements plopped into one before. how did you manage it?
