Author Topic: Chris Sheridan: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)  (Read 22646 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Chris Sheridan: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #75 on: June 19, 2015, 06:16:45 PM »

Offline Forza Juventus

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 964
  • Tommy Points: 70
Both sides a little carried away her. Not ready to Call Willie a Defensive Einstein, but he's not Bigmack Biyombo yeah I called him Bigmack.
 Seriously though Willie is a lot more quick laterally and much more athletic than Tyson Chandler ever was. He's going to be an awesome Defensive force, question is can you live with a guy that may not score hardly at all that high.
My comp for him is a cross between Bill Russel and Kwame Brown. He shares Russel's vague positive qualities that I'll take credit for if he's good in 3 years and Kwame's vague negative qualities that I'll take credit for if he sucks in 3 years.
TP

Biyombo averaged 27 minutes in 21 games as a starter this season and averaged 7 points, 8.4 rebounds, 1.8 blocks on 55% shooting and 63% from the line.   He posted the best defensive rating on his team and the Hornets had arguably their best stretch of the entire season with Biyombo and MKG receiving heavy minutes in January (winning 8 of 9). 

Seeing as those stats are extremely similar to Willie Cauley Stein's third year college stats (9 points, 6.4 rebounds, 1.7 blocks on 57% shooting/62% from the line) and it's pretty widely acknowledged that the NBA level is higher than the College level, I tend to think that at best, WCS would put up comparable numbers in a starting role... if he even gets it.  I'm not so sure why everyone is so convinced all these draftees are guaranteed starters.  Exum, Gordon, Smart and Randle were expected to be can't miss starters and all of them were pretty darn underwhelming in year one.  WCS = Biyombo.

I think Biyombo is a good opportunity in free agency. But I strongly disagree that WCS=Biyombo and I don't think it's even close.
Azzurri | Juventus | Boston Celtics | Kentucky Basketball

"All the negativity that’s on Celticsblog sucks. I’ve been around when Kyrie Irving was criticized. I’ve been around when Al Horford was insulted. And it stinks. It makes the greatest team, greatest fans in the world, lousy."

Celticsblog=sports radio

Re: Chris Sheriden: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #76 on: June 19, 2015, 06:23:19 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
after the dust clears on the draft posturing and misinformation, it seems pretty clear that the top 2 will be Towns and Okafor... otherwise Minny and LA are smoking crack.

After that, it's pretty clear that the 76ers will take Russell... they need a versatile scorer and he has the biggest boom/bust potential of any player in the top 25 ... That's Hinkie gold.   I'm pretty sure the Embiid stuff is exaggerated.  Russell will likely be their pick. 

Then I think it's pretty much a crap shoot... and although we're all getting draftoverhypeitus, I don't really think the lack of consensus is because of how deep the draft is... I just think it's a lot of hit/miss guys.   Mudiay maybe has the best chance of turning into something, but he's a bad fit for the triangle and could be a major bust.   Pozingus is getting a lot of press lately, but so did Yi Jianlian.   I'm on record as being underwhelmed by Willie Cauley Stein.  He should be a nice rim protector, but I'm not convinced he's any better than Bismack Biyombo.    There's some guys like Winslow that some people like, but some drafts have him going as low as 8th.    I wouldn't blame the Knicks for trading down or out entirely.   I"m not as hyped on this draft as most people are.   And I kinda see our #16 and #28 picks as borderline worthless.  Danny is going to want up or out.   Actually, there's some logic in him trading down too.   Don't rule that out.   I'll be surprised if he stands pat, though.

lol

Gonna need a lot of luck.  Of the players taken 11-20 last year, a couple have shown some signs, right?  How about the guys taken 22-30?

MIght get a couple role players out of those picks.   Might be a couple Fab Melos.  Whatever... half the league has a better draft pick than we do this year. 

And yeah... WCS is poor man's Biyombo ;)

Well obviously the picks aren't worthless. And the Biyombo comparison is asinine.
Eh... Hawks just had the best record in the East.  Thunder are a perennial contender.  They both have better draft picks than us this year.... as does half the league.  #16 and #28 aren't worth all that much.   They are worth something, sure...  People luck out with picks in that range (like Nurkic last year), but it's more likely to net a nobody or role player.   I'd be surprised to see us keep both picks.

And the Biyombo comparison is on point.

Your MO is so simplistic. If WCS were on the Sixers, then he'd be another foundation piece. As has been pointed out in other places Cauley-Stein and Noel are virtually identical as players. Limited offensively with great defense. Yet you won't put Noel in his class because it doesn't fit your Sixers cheerleading prerogative.

Even their measurements are comparable, but WCS has the slight edge.

HT
WCS 7' 0.5"
Noel 6' 11.75"

WT
WCS 242
Noel 206

Wingspan
WCS 7' 3"
Noel 7' 3.75"

Standing Reach
WCS 9' 3"
Noel 9' 2"

Age
WCS 21 (4 months younger than Noel)
Noel 21


That's completely asinine.  I was big on Noel well before he landed on the 76ers.    The fact that I still like him on speaks more to my interest in big man prospects who have transcendent defensive potential than it does about my "love" for the 76ers.    I would have gladly traded up for Embiid last season... the fact that he ended up on the 76ers has jack squat to do with my interest in him.  He was widely seen as the best prospect in the draft and some felt he should have gone 1st in spite of his injury.   The fact that DeAngelo Russell is probably the best guard in this draft and he just so happens to be ending up on the 76ers doesn't mean I'll like him just because he's on the 76ers.  If he ends up on the Knicks, he's still a quality asset.     I'm not high on Pozingus... I'm not going to be high on him if the 76ers take him.   

And as for WCS and NOel... they played together as Freshman.  NOel was a better defender back then.   Noel made strides in his rookie season... three years into WCS's college career and he showed very minimal improvement.   It seems asinine to claim that WCS is better when he wasn't three years ago.  I see more Biyombo in WCS than Noel.   That's not to say I'm dismissing WCS.  I think he'll be a solid rim protector.  So is biyombo.  I'd be very happy with either on the Celtics.   It'd be harder to get WCS than Biyombo, so I'd rather just sign Biyombo and use our assets for something else.

Noel was the #1 prospect in a weak class and still went #6. If he had been completely healthy he would've gone around the Smart range the following year.  You also keep saying that WCS has shown minimal improvement. Do you realize what you're saying?
I realize what I'm saying.  Do you realize what I'm saying?

Freshman:  8.3 points, 6.2 rebounds, 2.1 blocks, 62%/37%
Sophomore:  6.8 points, 6.1 rebounds, 2.9 blocks, 60%/48%
Junior:  8.9 points, 6.4 rebounds, 1.7 blocks, 57%/62%

*yawn*

Al Horford goes from averaging 5.6 points, 6.4 rebounds, 1.6 points on 48%/58% shooting... To averaging 13.2 points, 9.5 rebounds, 1.8 blocks on 61%/64% shooting

Joakim Noah goes from averaging 3.5 points, 2.5 rebounds, 0.7 blocks on 60%/57% shooting as a freshman to 14 points, 7.1 rebounds, 2.4 blocks on 63%/73% as a sophomore

Aldridge averaged 9.9 points, 5.9 rebounds, 1.5 blocks to 15 points, 9.2 rebounds, 2 blocks.

Blake Griffin goes from averaging 14.7 points, 9.1 rebounds, 0.8 blocks... to 22.7 points, 14.4 rebounds, 1.2 blocks

Tim duncan goes from averaging 9.8 points, 9.6 rebounds, 3.8 blocks... to 21 points, 14.7 rebounds, 3.3 blocks

Paul Millisap goes from averaging 15.6 points, 12.5 rebounds, 1.7 blocks to 19.6 points, 13.3 rebounds, 2.3 blocks

David Lee goes from averaging 7.0 points, 4.7 rebounds to 13.6 points, 9 rebounds

Roy Hibbert goes from averaging 5.1 points, 3.5 rebounds, 1.3 blocks  (47% shooting) to 13.4 points, 6.4 rebounds, 2.2 blocks (61% shooting)

Brook Lopez goes from 12.6 points, 6 rebounds, 1.7 blocks to 19.3 points, 8.2 rebounds, 2.1 blocks

....

Nobody finds it a little alarming that WCS saw minimal production over three years of college ball?  If he was worthy of more minutes, why wouldn't he have gotten more minutes?

Fwiw, Noel's freshman stats are underrated:  10.5 points, 9.5 rebounds, 4.4 blocks, 2.1 steals, 59% shooting

Fwiw, Noel saw improvement from the first and second half of his rookie NBA season:

Pre all-star:  8.2 points, 7.2 rebounds, 1.7 blocks, 1.6 steals, 45%/56%   
Post all-star:  13 points, 10 rebounds, 2.3 blocks, 2.1 steals 49%/66%

Is it possible that WCS spent 3 years of college ball with minimal improvement and will suddenly show up in the NBA and blossom?  Maybe.  Doubt it.  I'm not hating on him. I'd welcome him in Boston.  He should be a solid defensive rim protector and if he falls to 9, we should make a play for him.  But solid defensive rim protector is exactly what i see Bismack Biyombo as.... and he's a free agent.   

Re: Chris Sheriden: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #77 on: June 19, 2015, 06:25:38 PM »

Offline MBunge

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Tommy Points: 471
three years into WCS's college career and he showed very minimal improvement.   

From sports-reference.com.

WCS's defensive rating per 100 possession went from 91.1 as a freshman to 80 as a junior.  His defensive win share went from 1.5 as a freshman to 3.4 as a junior.  His defensive box plus/minus went from 6.1 as a freshman to 10 as a junior.

WCS's stats in those categories as a junior are either better or close to as good as Noel's as a freshman.

Now, I'm not a huge WCS fan but you are over the moon for Noel.  If Noel is a transcendent defensive talent, it sure looks like WCS at two years older has every possibility of becoming just slightly less transcendent.

Mike

Re: Chris Sheriden: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #78 on: June 19, 2015, 06:29:03 PM »

Offline MBunge

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Tommy Points: 471

Nobody finds it a little alarming that WCS saw minimal production over three years of college ball?  If he was worthy of more minutes, why wouldn't he have gotten more minutes?

Karl Anthony Towns averaged 21.1 minutes a game for Kentucky last season.  If he's worthy of being the #1 pick, why didn't he play more?

You really need to stop working quite so hard at pretending to be smarter than other fans.

Mike

Re: Chris Sheriden: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #79 on: June 19, 2015, 06:29:42 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
three years into WCS's college career and he showed very minimal improvement.   

From basketball-reference.com.

WCS's defensive rating per 100 possession went from 91.1 as a freshman to 80 as a junior.  His defensive win share went from 1.5 as a freshman to 3.4 as a junior.  His defensive box plus/minus went from 6.1 as a freshman to 10 as a junior.

WCS's stats in those categories as a junior are either better or close to as good as Noel's as a freshman.

Now, I'm not a huge WCS fan but you are over the moon for Noel.  If Noel is a transcendent defensive talent, it sure looks like WCS at two years older has every possibility of becoming just slightly less transcendent.

Mike
This is where I admit the ceiling of my basketball knowledge and ask for someone smarter than me to explain how much system and surrounding talent can impact WCS's defensive rating and win share.  Biyombo's defensive rating went from 107 as a rookie to 99 last season (would have been top 10 in the league with qualified minutes).  How much is that is influenced by surrounding talent? 

In WCS's rookie season... he played with Nerlens NOel.  Noel's defensive rating was 81.9 with a DWS of 2.4 ... You just told me WCS's defensive rating was 91.1 with a DWS of 1.5.   K...  and I aint so smart but could his low "defensive win share" have something to do with the fact that he was playing with a vastly superior defender as a Freshman?    Btw, Noel's defensive rating as an NBA rookie - 99.  DWS - 4.2.  Both Top 10.

« Last Edit: June 19, 2015, 06:50:13 PM by LarBrd33 »

Re: Chris Sheriden: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #80 on: June 19, 2015, 06:31:20 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016

Nobody finds it a little alarming that WCS saw minimal production over three years of college ball?  If he was worthy of more minutes, why wouldn't he have gotten more minutes?

Karl Anthony Towns averaged 21.1 minutes a game for Kentucky last season.  If he's worthy of being the #1 pick, why didn't he play more?

You really need to stop working quite so hard at pretending to be smarter than other fans.

Mike
See my many examples above.  Towns averaged 21.1 minutes as a freshman.  If by year three he was still averaging 21.1 minutes, i'd be concerned.   WCS's lack of progression over three seasons should offer most people pause... seeing as essentially EVERY big man who played more than a single season of college ball saw improvement over the seasons.

Shaq averaged 13.9 points, 12 rebounds, 3.6 blocks as a freshman... as a junior he was averaging 24 points, 14 rebounds, 5.2 blocks... his numbers/minutes went up because that's what happens with COllege players.  Akeem Olajuwon averaged 18 minutes as a freshman - 8.3 points, 6.2 rebounds, 2.5 blocks with 61% shooting... By year 3:  16.8 points, 13.5 rebounds, 5.6 blocks... 67% shooting.

Re: Chris Sheriden: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #81 on: June 19, 2015, 06:33:28 PM »

Offline mmmmm

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5308
  • Tommy Points: 862
after the dust clears on the draft posturing and misinformation, it seems pretty clear that the top 2 will be Towns and Okafor... otherwise Minny and LA are smoking crack.

After that, it's pretty clear that the 76ers will take Russell... they need a versatile scorer and he has the biggest boom/bust potential of any player in the top 25 ... That's Hinkie gold.   I'm pretty sure the Embiid stuff is exaggerated.  Russell will likely be their pick. 

Then I think it's pretty much a crap shoot... and although we're all getting draftoverhypeitus, I don't really think the lack of consensus is because of how deep the draft is... I just think it's a lot of hit/miss guys.   Mudiay maybe has the best chance of turning into something, but he's a bad fit for the triangle and could be a major bust.   Pozingus is getting a lot of press lately, but so did Yi Jianlian.   I'm on record as being underwhelmed by Willie Cauley Stein.  He should be a nice rim protector, but I'm not convinced he's any better than Bismack Biyombo.    There's some guys like Winslow that some people like, but some drafts have him going as low as 8th.    I wouldn't blame the Knicks for trading down or out entirely.   I"m not as hyped on this draft as most people are.   And I kinda see our #16 and #28 picks as borderline worthless.  Danny is going to want up or out.   Actually, there's some logic in him trading down too.   Don't rule that out.   I'll be surprised if he stands pat, though.

lol

Gonna need a lot of luck.  Of the players taken 11-20 last year, a couple have shown some signs, right?  How about the guys taken 22-30?

MIght get a couple role players out of those picks.   Might be a couple Fab Melos.  Whatever... half the league has a better draft pick than we do this year. 

And yeah... I see WCS as comparable to Biyombo.

LOL!  Seriously?  You are looking back just one year?  Was it too hard to at least look back 3 or 4 years and consider how the guys from those drafts may be turning out?

At any rate, there are actual studies.  Arguing with anecdotal examples is ... a bit silly.

Historically, the 16th pick can be expected to result in a solid starter or star about 30% of the time.  The 28th pick, only about 15%.  Not great odds, but not worthless.

For comparison, though, the 4th pick results in at least a solid starter or star about 90% of the time.

NYK will definitely want actual player bodies to go along with any lower picks to balance those odds.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt?  Incompetent?  Which is worse?  Does it matter?  It sucks.

Re: Chris Sheridan: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #82 on: June 19, 2015, 06:34:08 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8889
  • Tommy Points: 290
WCS and Noel may be close right now but who knows which ends up better. Noel lost a year of development. WCS has had more time and easier competition. WCS looks like a faster defender and better athlete. Noel looks like his offense is capable of 10-15pts a game with a poor team of distributors. Time will tell. I don't see why they can't be equal talents right now.

Re: Chris Sheridan: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #83 on: June 19, 2015, 06:35:35 PM »

Offline Chief Macho

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1247
  • Tommy Points: 84
What a dumb article. No real information.  I don't buy it either way, Danny likes his asset treasure chest too much for anything at the four spot.  The first or second is another story.

Re: Chris Sheriden: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #84 on: June 19, 2015, 07:08:04 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
after the dust clears on the draft posturing and misinformation, it seems pretty clear that the top 2 will be Towns and Okafor... otherwise Minny and LA are smoking crack.

After that, it's pretty clear that the 76ers will take Russell... they need a versatile scorer and he has the biggest boom/bust potential of any player in the top 25 ... That's Hinkie gold.   I'm pretty sure the Embiid stuff is exaggerated.  Russell will likely be their pick. 

Then I think it's pretty much a crap shoot... and although we're all getting draftoverhypeitus, I don't really think the lack of consensus is because of how deep the draft is... I just think it's a lot of hit/miss guys.   Mudiay maybe has the best chance of turning into something, but he's a bad fit for the triangle and could be a major bust.   Pozingus is getting a lot of press lately, but so did Yi Jianlian.   I'm on record as being underwhelmed by Willie Cauley Stein.  He should be a nice rim protector, but I'm not convinced he's any better than Bismack Biyombo.    There's some guys like Winslow that some people like, but some drafts have him going as low as 8th.    I wouldn't blame the Knicks for trading down or out entirely.   I"m not as hyped on this draft as most people are.   And I kinda see our #16 and #28 picks as borderline worthless.  Danny is going to want up or out.   Actually, there's some logic in him trading down too.   Don't rule that out.   I'll be surprised if he stands pat, though.

lol

Gonna need a lot of luck.  Of the players taken 11-20 last year, a couple have shown some signs, right?  How about the guys taken 22-30?

MIght get a couple role players out of those picks.   Might be a couple Fab Melos.  Whatever... half the league has a better draft pick than we do this year. 

And yeah... I see WCS as comparable to Biyombo.

So far, the picks after 10 from last year don't look all that promising.  '08 was really strong in the bottom of the first round, as was '11.  '13 looks like another draft which will fit that bill as well. 

There are lots of late lottery and beyond gems every year. 
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Chris Sheriden: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #85 on: June 19, 2015, 07:57:48 PM »

Offline MBunge

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Tommy Points: 471

Nobody finds it a little alarming that WCS saw minimal production over three years of college ball?  If he was worthy of more minutes, why wouldn't he have gotten more minutes?

Karl Anthony Towns averaged 21.1 minutes a game for Kentucky last season.  If he's worthy of being the #1 pick, why didn't he play more?

You really need to stop working quite so hard at pretending to be smarter than other fans.

Mike
See my many examples above.  Towns averaged 21.1 minutes as a freshman.  If by year three he was still averaging 21.1 minutes, i'd be concerned.   WCS's lack of progression over three seasons should offer most people pause... seeing as essentially EVERY big man who played more than a single season of college ball saw improvement over the seasons.

Shaq averaged 13.9 points, 12 rebounds, 3.6 blocks as a freshman... as a junior he was averaging 24 points, 14 rebounds, 5.2 blocks... his numbers/minutes went up because that's what happens with COllege players.  Akeem Olajuwon averaged 18 minutes as a freshman - 8.3 points, 6.2 rebounds, 2.5 blocks with 61% shooting... By year 3:  16.8 points, 13.5 rebounds, 5.6 blocks... 67% shooting.

You are the only person on Earth comparing WCS to Shaq or Olajuwon.  No one is making that comparison because no on expects him to be anywhere near as good as those players.  It's idiotic to make such a comparison

No one is excited about WCS because they think he's a great offensive player.  He's not.

No one is excited about WCS because they think he's a great rebounder.  He's not.

People are excited about WCS because they think his physical tools will translate very well to the NBA game as it's now played.  I'm not so sure of that but the evidence people use to justify that belief are the same sort of advanced defensive stats that you allude to whenever you're gushing over your binkie, Noel.

I'm not sure anyone even thinks WCS will be as good as Noel, but is Noel is "transcendent" and WCS is 70% of that, he'd still be a pretty good player.

Mike

Re: Chris Sheriden: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #86 on: June 19, 2015, 08:05:40 PM »

Offline mmmmm

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5308
  • Tommy Points: 862
Nobody finds it a little alarming that WCS saw minimal production over three years of college ball?  If he was worthy of more minutes, why wouldn't he have gotten more minutes?
 

I don't think WCS' value is expected to be measured by the points he scores.

More likely it is to be measured by the points he prevents.

Note - I too, feel WCS is highly over-rated by many on CelticsBlog.  He's #12 on my own board.

But your arguments are pretty bizarre and entertaining.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt?  Incompetent?  Which is worse?  Does it matter?  It sucks.

Re: Chris Sheridan: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #87 on: June 19, 2015, 08:06:51 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
WCS has better physical tools than Noel imo. He has the speed, athleticism, and size to have a KG-like effect on the defensive end. His jumper also looks very good lately. If he continues to improve the jumper he then has most of KG's skill set. The question imo is does he have the mentality and work ethic, to be like KG and I think he does not, but I honestly don't know.

Re: Chris Sheriden: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #88 on: June 19, 2015, 08:07:35 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016

Nobody finds it a little alarming that WCS saw minimal production over three years of college ball?  If he was worthy of more minutes, why wouldn't he have gotten more minutes?

Karl Anthony Towns averaged 21.1 minutes a game for Kentucky last season.  If he's worthy of being the #1 pick, why didn't he play more?

You really need to stop working quite so hard at pretending to be smarter than other fans.

Mike
See my many examples above.  Towns averaged 21.1 minutes as a freshman.  If by year three he was still averaging 21.1 minutes, i'd be concerned.   WCS's lack of progression over three seasons should offer most people pause... seeing as essentially EVERY big man who played more than a single season of college ball saw improvement over the seasons.

Shaq averaged 13.9 points, 12 rebounds, 3.6 blocks as a freshman... as a junior he was averaging 24 points, 14 rebounds, 5.2 blocks... his numbers/minutes went up because that's what happens with COllege players.  Akeem Olajuwon averaged 18 minutes as a freshman - 8.3 points, 6.2 rebounds, 2.5 blocks with 61% shooting... By year 3:  16.8 points, 13.5 rebounds, 5.6 blocks... 67% shooting.

You are the only person on Earth comparing WCS to Shaq or Olajuwon.  No one is making that comparison because no on expects him to be anywhere near as good as those players.  It's idiotic to make such a comparison

No one is excited about WCS because they think he's a great offensive player.  He's not.

No one is excited about WCS because they think he's a great rebounder.  He's not.

People are excited about WCS because they think his physical tools will translate very well to the NBA game as it's now played.  I'm not so sure of that but the evidence people use to justify that belief are the same sort of advanced defensive stats that you allude to whenever you're gushing over your binkie, Noel.

I'm not sure anyone even thinks WCS will be as good as Noel, but is Noel is "transcendent" and WCS is 70% of that, he'd still be a pretty good player.

Mike
So in other words... WCS = Biyombo

Re: Chris Sheridan: C's could trade for #4 pick (speculation)
« Reply #89 on: June 19, 2015, 08:31:02 PM »

Offline Rosco917

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6108
  • Tommy Points: 559
 
WCS game is much more suited to the speed, and the open spacing, and the pick and roll game of the NBA. Once he gets the mental part of the NBA game down, he will be a strong valuable defender, a good rebounder, and rim protecter. Scoring will come, he shoots pretty well.

IMO In Kentucky, sharing real estate with Towns, he was playing in a closet. His main attributes were smothered, speed, lateral quickness, and open court running. When your 7' and can move like him, the kid was a wide receiver in high school, he can move, run, and cut. He should be a natural defender. As he matures in a few years and adds 20 pounds, he will be even better.

The Celtic could certainly use a young Tyson Chandler.