If you have a choice between adding johnson and oubre (similar level prospect),considering how unathletic overall the Celts is as a team, I would choose Oubre or Anderson
RJ Hunter is a top two or three shooter of the entire draft plus has really good size, length for a sg. Celts could also use 3 pt shooting. So that is why again I would take him over Johnson
The thing is this with your posts about who you like and don't like -- you severely skew towards "athletic" types regardless of overall skill levels. If you don't think that's the case, you should review your posts because that's how your coming across. It's fine if that's how you intend it but based on what you've just covered in the recent couple of posts, it doesn't seem that way.
The analysis of the Hunter choice -- that's a solid viewpoint that doesn't come across in other posts. Shooting over defense as a more critical need. Others may not agree in the preference but it's definitely a valid point.
the choice of Oubre or Anderson is an example of the opposite. this is where you're going for what you perceive as a more athletic player simply for that reason. Johnson, by all accounts, is considered athletic enough to play/defend 2 or 3 positions in the NBA. He's got the physical build to play physically right now - not wait for his frame to fill out. the other 2, not so much. Oubre's motor has come into question, not so with Johnson. The skillset variances between them can be debated but if 2 guys are of similar skillsets but one has a questionable desire while the other one is fully committed, I'll take fully committed 10 times out of 10. As for Anderson, he does not have the physical presence of Johnson which is why he's rated lower as well as not expected to be as versatile a defender.