On that note ^ .....
Can we please stop comparing stats from players who began their careers in different years, especially when the difference is 5+ years? The game changes so rapidly these days. In general, I've never been a fan of comparing stats. If you want to compare TA's rookie year to Smart's then you have to basically look at the ENTIRE NBA at those two points too. The Celtics team with TA was much different than that of the team now with Smart. How can anyone use those two reference points to make any type of argument? I get it, people are literally paid to do that everyday. I don't understand why...that's just me. I'm a 24 year old guy who still values the "eye test" and actually watching games versus relying on PER, per 36 minutes stats, etc.
Only valuable "analytics" I've seen came from Houston. I love what they're doing with their D-League team and on their own court with only threes and layups. They've helped change this league so much, for better or worse is unknown.