0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
If we had someone that could score, when IT was on the bench, we would have had a better chance of winning.
I think we had one timeout left. Why did CBS not call a timeout?
Quote from: kozlodoev on March 01, 2015, 08:26:22 PMQuote from: 34truth on March 01, 2015, 08:24:42 PMbla bla bla. Is it nice that the cs are competitive and just sized the nbas best team up? yeah. Are we fighting and putting in effort? yeah. Are we expected to lose? yeah. Still, 26 up. Win the game"Sized", really? One adjustment on defense (moving an extra guy on the box to stop IT's penetration), and we go from up 26 to losing the game (thanks, Brad S). If there were a 5th quarter, we may have _lost_ by 26.I disagree. The celtics may have not played much better, and I thought they were really lucky in the first quarter cause they were giving up open shots. But GSW didnt play that much better either. And they had some doubtful calls going their way
Quote from: 34truth on March 01, 2015, 08:24:42 PMbla bla bla. Is it nice that the cs are competitive and just sized the nbas best team up? yeah. Are we fighting and putting in effort? yeah. Are we expected to lose? yeah. Still, 26 up. Win the game"Sized", really? One adjustment on defense (moving an extra guy on the box to stop IT's penetration), and we go from up 26 to losing the game (thanks, Brad S). If there were a 5th quarter, we may have _lost_ by 26.
bla bla bla. Is it nice that the cs are competitive and just sized the nbas best team up? yeah. Are we fighting and putting in effort? yeah. Are we expected to lose? yeah. Still, 26 up. Win the game
Quote from: Rosco917 on March 01, 2015, 08:26:07 PMIf we had someone that could score, when IT was on the bench, we would have had a better chance of winning.That would be... Isaiah Thomas, who has no business spending 20 minutes of the game on the pine.(thanks, Brad S)
Quote from: 34truth on March 01, 2015, 08:28:07 PMQuote from: kozlodoev on March 01, 2015, 08:26:22 PMQuote from: 34truth on March 01, 2015, 08:24:42 PMbla bla bla. Is it nice that the cs are competitive and just sized the nbas best team up? yeah. Are we fighting and putting in effort? yeah. Are we expected to lose? yeah. Still, 26 up. Win the game"Sized", really? One adjustment on defense (moving an extra guy on the box to stop IT's penetration), and we go from up 26 to losing the game (thanks, Brad S). If there were a 5th quarter, we may have _lost_ by 26.I disagree. The celtics may have not played much better, and I thought they were really lucky in the first quarter cause they were giving up open shots. But GSW didnt play that much better either. And they had some doubtful calls going their waySorry, I could literally see how the offense fizzled towards the end of the second quarter as a result of GS going to a quasi-box defense. This team has absolutely no idea how to make adjustments, and this is entirely on the coach.I agree with the adjustments part. I just think overall Stevens is doing a very good job
Quote from: kozlodoev on March 01, 2015, 08:28:25 PMQuote from: Rosco917 on March 01, 2015, 08:26:07 PMIf we had someone that could score, when IT was on the bench, we would have had a better chance of winning.That would be... Isaiah Thomas, who has no business spending 20 minutes of the game on the pine.(thanks, Brad S)you are killing stevens too much. Check our roster out. I disagree with a lot of his decisions, but his philosophy has this Celtics playing together and being very competitive night in night out
Quote from: 34truth on March 01, 2015, 08:30:25 PMQuote from: kozlodoev on March 01, 2015, 08:28:25 PMQuote from: Rosco917 on March 01, 2015, 08:26:07 PMIf we had someone that could score, when IT was on the bench, we would have had a better chance of winning.That would be... Isaiah Thomas, who has no business spending 20 minutes of the game on the pine.(thanks, Brad S)you are killing stevens too much. Check our roster out. I disagree with a lot of his decisions, but his philosophy has this Celtics playing together and being very competitive night in night outOf course I'm killing him. Kindly check how many minutes the best players on the GS roster played tonight. News flash: you have to play your best players to get the best result.You can tell I'm a bit bitter tonight, can't you?
theres no perfect coach. Ask me, I wouldn't think kerr would be doing a whole lot better than Brad with our team
Quote from: MarcusStart on March 01, 2015, 08:27:28 PMI think we had one timeout left. Why did CBS not call a timeout?We did. I dont know, maybe he thought thomas would get open easier. He did get sourt of open. Still, if its a coach that has great out of bounds play, he wouldnt hesitate
Quote from: kozlodoev on March 01, 2015, 08:32:49 PMQuote from: 34truth on March 01, 2015, 08:30:25 PMQuote from: kozlodoev on March 01, 2015, 08:28:25 PMQuote from: Rosco917 on March 01, 2015, 08:26:07 PMIf we had someone that could score, when IT was on the bench, we would have had a better chance of winning.That would be... Isaiah Thomas, who has no business spending 20 minutes of the game on the pine.(thanks, Brad S)you are killing stevens too much. Check our roster out. I disagree with a lot of his decisions, but his philosophy has this Celtics playing together and being very competitive night in night outOf course I'm killing him. Kindly check how many minutes the best players on the GS roster played tonight. News flash: you have to play your best players to get the best result.You can tell I'm a bit bitter tonight, can't you? Crowder shouldve knocked down that 3.
Quote from: 34truth on March 01, 2015, 08:31:59 PMtheres no perfect coach. Ask me, I wouldn't think kerr would be doing a whole lot better than Brad with our teamKerr won the game from 26 down. With actual adjustments. And by playing Klay Thompson and Stephen Curry 39 minutes. Brad S lost by Isaiah Thomas 28 minutes and Jae Crowder 26 minutes.