Author Topic: Which one has more potential?  (Read 5430 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Which one has more potential?
« Reply #15 on: February 10, 2015, 08:16:50 PM »

Offline Rondo9

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5379
  • Tommy Points: 277
Don't spend too much time worrying about it.  I agree with the above post to that effect.

The Celtics aren't gonna make a splash in the RFA market this summer.  Butler, Leonard, Harris are all staying put.

I've heard New York will make a big play for Harris this summer.

Re: Which one has more potential?
« Reply #16 on: February 10, 2015, 08:22:46 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
It just doesn't make sense to me that Orlando wouldn't match.  Who else are they going to spend that money on?
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Which one has more potential?
« Reply #17 on: February 10, 2015, 08:23:56 PM »

Offline Rondo9

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5379
  • Tommy Points: 277
It depends on what New York throws at him and of course where Orlando drafts.

Re: Which one has more potential?
« Reply #18 on: February 10, 2015, 09:10:53 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51956
  • Tommy Points: 3186
I see that most of these scenarios have Cauley-Stein as our next center. I would like that too but Bleacher Report had a mock draft with him going at 6 to Sacramento two days ago. Right now we have the 10th worst record. That may change after the trade deadline but I think a 7 foot rim defender who is going to get a great deal of exposure during the NCAA Tournament will only move up in the draft not down. We may already have forfeited our chance to secure the middle of our defense with meaningless wins often aided by the contributions of veterans who should have been moved already.
Yeah, I've seen that with several mocks, too. I just don't buy it. I don't think Cousins should/can play the 4 as effectively as he does the 5. I mean, he's already extremely dominant as a 5 on both sides of the ball, so why waste a good draft pick on someone who is probably going to be a Tyson Chandler clone? I think he slips past Sacramento.
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Re: Which one has more potential?
« Reply #19 on: February 10, 2015, 10:23:46 PM »

Offline BASS_THUMPER

  • Scal's #1 Fan
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11472
  • Tommy Points: 5352
  • Thumper of the BASS!
Bass in not one lineup....?

Re: Which one has more potential?
« Reply #20 on: February 11, 2015, 02:30:09 PM »

Offline MSceltic

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 239
  • Tommy Points: 23
I like the butler one the best, but i also think its the least realistic. What happens to bradley in these scenarios?

Re: Which one has more potential?
« Reply #21 on: February 11, 2015, 03:46:22 PM »

Offline PickNRoll

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1691
  • Tommy Points: 199
D'Angelo Russell,Marcus Smart, Jimmy Butler, Brandon Bass, Demarcus Cousins. 

Re: Which one has more potential?
« Reply #22 on: February 11, 2015, 04:33:27 PM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
Team A:
PG:Smart
SG: Young
SF: Butler
PF: Sully
C: Cauley-Stein

Team B:
PG:Smart
SG: Young
SF: Leonard
PF: Sully
C: Cauley-Stein

Team C:
PG: Smart
SG: Young
SF: S. Johnson
PF: Sully
C: D. Jordan

Team D:
PG: Smart
SG: Dragic
SF: Young
PF: Sully
C: Cauley-Stein

Team E: (Trade several picks for the rights to whoever we don't pick: S. Johnson/Cauley-Stein)
PG: Smart
SG: Young
SF: S. Johnson
PF: Sully
C: Cauley-Stein

Which team has/is:
1) the most potential?
2) the most realistic?
3) or which players could be substituted to make these teams better?

I think Team A has the most potential, is the most realistic, and is built the best.
I like team B the most in terms of potential. I think team E is the most realistic.
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19

Re: Which one has more potential?
« Reply #23 on: February 11, 2015, 05:14:11 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51956
  • Tommy Points: 3186
Team A:
PG:Smart
SG: Young
SF: Butler
PF: Sully
C: Cauley-Stein

Team B:
PG:Smart
SG: Young
SF: Leonard
PF: Sully
C: Cauley-Stein

Team C:
PG: Smart
SG: Young
SF: S. Johnson
PF: Sully
C: D. Jordan

Team D:
PG: Smart
SG: Dragic
SF: Young
PF: Sully
C: Cauley-Stein

Team E: (Trade several picks for the rights to whoever we don't pick: S. Johnson/Cauley-Stein)
PG: Smart
SG: Young
SF: S. Johnson
PF: Sully
C: Cauley-Stein

Which team has/is:
1) the most potential?
2) the most realistic?
3) or which players could be substituted to make these teams better?

I think Team A has the most potential, is the most realistic, and is built the best.
I like team B the most in terms of potential. I think team E is the most realistic.

I like Team E, and I do think it's realistic with our stash of picks. The team has tons of potential,but I'm always worried about not having any established talent or veteran guys to help lead the young guys, no matter how good they are.
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Re: Which one has more potential?
« Reply #24 on: February 11, 2015, 06:45:41 PM »

Offline TheOneTrueRobb

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 38
  • Tommy Points: 14
I see that most of these scenarios have Cauley-Stein as our next center. I would like that too but Bleacher Report had a mock draft with him going at 6 to Sacramento two days ago. Right now we have the 10th worst record. That may change after the trade deadline but I think a 7 foot rim defender who is going to get a great deal of exposure during the NCAA Tournament will only move up in the draft not down.

This assumes we don't use all those accumulated picks and expiring contracts* and tradeable assets to move up in the draft. That won't net us the #1 spot (Okafur, obviously), but might be enough to grab Cauly-Stein.


*OK, one expiring contract...
-------
------
-----
----
---

Re: Which one has more potential?
« Reply #25 on: February 11, 2015, 06:58:34 PM »

Offline Texstyles

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 438
  • Tommy Points: 44
Smart, blank, blank, blank, Cousins.  Now the blanks are not just anyone but solid players.  I think PF would be Sully or Olynk (1 will be gone in Cousins trade).  Bradley could still be here but think we could improve SG and SF through draft or FA.