0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Cman on January 23, 2015, 03:37:08 PMKraft's statement on NFLhttp://espn.go.com/blog/boston/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4776995/robert-kraft-statement-on-investigationnote the "during the three days they were here." I find it odd that the NFL interviewed 40 people, was actually at the Patriots facility for three days, but now is gone, and haven't contacted Tom Brady.It baffles my mind that they wouldn't interview Brady.
Kraft's statement on NFLhttp://espn.go.com/blog/boston/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4776995/robert-kraft-statement-on-investigationnote the "during the three days they were here." I find it odd that the NFL interviewed 40 people, was actually at the Patriots facility for three days, but now is gone, and haven't contacted Tom Brady.
Quote from: Donoghus on January 23, 2015, 03:42:45 PMQuote from: Cman on January 23, 2015, 03:37:08 PMKraft's statement on NFLhttp://espn.go.com/blog/boston/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4776995/robert-kraft-statement-on-investigationnote the "during the three days they were here." I find it odd that the NFL interviewed 40 people, was actually at the Patriots facility for three days, but now is gone, and haven't contacted Tom Brady.It baffles my mind that they wouldn't interview Brady. Maybe they're going to try to whitewash things again, like they did with Ray Rice.
Correct -- the NFL isn't pushing this. Media outlets who don't want to start Super Bowl coverage until this monday are doing it.
Quote from: D.o.s. on January 23, 2015, 04:04:23 PMCorrect -- the NFL isn't pushing this. Media outlets who don't want to start Super Bowl coverage until this monday are doing it.But the NFL actually stopped a game to check the pressure of a football before the media knew anything was going on, and now they've interviewed 40 people. The media is eating this up, but only in response to what the NFL is doing.The NFL is clearly trying to give the Colts (and the other non-Patriot teams) the impression that they are doing due diligence on any cheating allegations. Still not sure if they want to find anything or not though.
Quote from: D.o.s. on January 23, 2015, 04:04:23 PMCorrect -- the NFL isn't pushing this. Media outlets who don't want to start Super Bowl coverage until this monday are doing it.The NFL is clearly trying to give the fans the impression that they are doing due diligence on any cheating allegations. Still not sure if they want to find anything or not though.
Quote from: littleteapot on January 23, 2015, 04:07:59 PMQuote from: D.o.s. on January 23, 2015, 04:04:23 PMCorrect -- the NFL isn't pushing this. Media outlets who don't want to start Super Bowl coverage until this monday are doing it.The NFL is clearly trying to give the fans the impression that they are doing due diligence on any cheating allegations. Still not sure if they want to find anything or not though.Fixed that for you.
Quote from: D.o.s. on January 23, 2015, 04:13:34 PMQuote from: littleteapot on January 23, 2015, 04:07:59 PMQuote from: D.o.s. on January 23, 2015, 04:04:23 PMCorrect -- the NFL isn't pushing this. Media outlets who don't want to start Super Bowl coverage until this monday are doing it.The NFL is clearly trying to give the fans the impression that they are doing due diligence on any cheating allegations. Still not sure if they want to find anything or not though.Fixed that for you. Um no, if the colts had complained and they'd just said "who cares shut up" then the only way there is any fan/media uproar is if the colts use the fans and media to leverage the nfl into doing something.This started before the fans or media knew anything and the only 3 parties who knew anything were the Pats (if they actually were deflating balls), the Colts and the NFL. One of those parties WANTED the fans to know about this. Which one do you think it is?
Quote from: kozlodoev on January 23, 2015, 02:21:13 PMThe fun continues:http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/01/23/nfl-issues-statement-on-deflategate-investigation/So they've interviewed 40 people and neither of them was named Tom Brady. Can't say I'm impressed.I was, however, hoping to see more about the specific levels of (under)inflation.The best part is in the comments, where someone does the math.What does it say about the collective iq of the American public, spending two weeks threshing over what could be explained with 5 minutes of arithmetic?QuoteP = nRT/V The change in pressure is thus proportional to the change in temperature, The 75 degree locker room has an absolute temperature of 297o K The 40 degree playing field has an absolute temperature of 283o K The change in temperature of 14o K will thus cause a drop in pressure of 14/297 = 4.7%. To translate this into a pressure change we must recall that football pressure is measured in gauge pressure, relative to the atmospheric pressure of 15 psi. So the absolute pressure within a football pumped to 13 psi is 13 +15 = 28psi absolute. The 4.7% drop applied to the absolute pressure gives a drop of 1.32 psi. Thus, the pressure within the football at game time will be only 13 -1.32 = 11.68 psi and thus well below regulation gauge pressure of 12.5-13.5psi. If they were just at 12.5psi to start they would be down by 1.3psi to 11.2psi by game time. And of course, a little pressure is lost every time you stick a needle in to check the pressure. Some guy on TV did this calculation but I think he forgot about absolute pressure vs gauge pressure and underestimated it. It thus seems highly likely that the Patriots equipment manager checked all 12 balls in a warm locker room and they lost pressure merely by cooling off on the field. In addition, the cold rain would have accelerated the heat transfer out of the balls. Finally, if the indoor inflation air was very humid, there would be an additional loss of pressure due to water vapor condensation on the inside of the bladder as the temperature of the football dropped.
The fun continues:http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/01/23/nfl-issues-statement-on-deflategate-investigation/So they've interviewed 40 people and neither of them was named Tom Brady. Can't say I'm impressed.I was, however, hoping to see more about the specific levels of (under)inflation.
P = nRT/V The change in pressure is thus proportional to the change in temperature, The 75 degree locker room has an absolute temperature of 297o K The 40 degree playing field has an absolute temperature of 283o K The change in temperature of 14o K will thus cause a drop in pressure of 14/297 = 4.7%. To translate this into a pressure change we must recall that football pressure is measured in gauge pressure, relative to the atmospheric pressure of 15 psi. So the absolute pressure within a football pumped to 13 psi is 13 +15 = 28psi absolute. The 4.7% drop applied to the absolute pressure gives a drop of 1.32 psi. Thus, the pressure within the football at game time will be only 13 -1.32 = 11.68 psi and thus well below regulation gauge pressure of 12.5-13.5psi. If they were just at 12.5psi to start they would be down by 1.3psi to 11.2psi by game time. And of course, a little pressure is lost every time you stick a needle in to check the pressure. Some guy on TV did this calculation but I think he forgot about absolute pressure vs gauge pressure and underestimated it. It thus seems highly likely that the Patriots equipment manager checked all 12 balls in a warm locker room and they lost pressure merely by cooling off on the field. In addition, the cold rain would have accelerated the heat transfer out of the balls. Finally, if the indoor inflation air was very humid, there would be an additional loss of pressure due to water vapor condensation on the inside of the bladder as the temperature of the football dropped.
Quote from: littleteapot on January 23, 2015, 04:17:24 PMQuote from: D.o.s. on January 23, 2015, 04:13:34 PMQuote from: littleteapot on January 23, 2015, 04:07:59 PMQuote from: D.o.s. on January 23, 2015, 04:04:23 PMCorrect -- the NFL isn't pushing this. Media outlets who don't want to start Super Bowl coverage until this monday are doing it.The NFL is clearly trying to give the fans the impression that they are doing due diligence on any cheating allegations. Still not sure if they want to find anything or not though.Fixed that for you. Um no, if the colts had complained and they'd just said "who cares shut up" then the only way there is any fan/media uproar is if the colts use the fans and media to leverage the nfl into doing something.This started before the fans or media knew anything and the only 3 parties who knew anything were the Pats (if they actually were deflating balls), the Colts and the NFL. One of those parties WANTED the fans to know about this. Which one do you think it is?You could add the Baltimore Ravens to that mix if you believe Jay Glazer's report from earlier this week.
Canty disputed a CBS Sports report that the Ravens believe the kicking balls used in the Ravens' Jan. 10 playoff loss at New England were underinflated, and coach John Harbaugh said Wednesday that the Ravens "didn't notice anything" about the condition of Patriots' footballs used in that same game.
Quote from: Donoghus on January 23, 2015, 04:20:06 PMQuote from: littleteapot on January 23, 2015, 04:17:24 PMQuote from: D.o.s. on January 23, 2015, 04:13:34 PMQuote from: littleteapot on January 23, 2015, 04:07:59 PMQuote from: D.o.s. on January 23, 2015, 04:04:23 PMCorrect -- the NFL isn't pushing this. Media outlets who don't want to start Super Bowl coverage until this monday are doing it.The NFL is clearly trying to give the fans the impression that they are doing due diligence on any cheating allegations. Still not sure if they want to find anything or not though.Fixed that for you. Um no, if the colts had complained and they'd just said "who cares shut up" then the only way there is any fan/media uproar is if the colts use the fans and media to leverage the nfl into doing something.This started before the fans or media knew anything and the only 3 parties who knew anything were the Pats (if they actually were deflating balls), the Colts and the NFL. One of those parties WANTED the fans to know about this. Which one do you think it is?You could add the Baltimore Ravens to that mix if you believe Jay Glazer's report from earlier this week.As a Ravens fan I've followed their reaction closely. This was the latest bit of news:QuoteCanty disputed a CBS Sports report that the Ravens believe the kicking balls used in the Ravens' Jan. 10 playoff loss at New England were underinflated, and coach John Harbaugh said Wednesday that the Ravens "didn't notice anything" about the condition of Patriots' footballs used in that same game.http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/12210318/chris-canty-baltimore-ravens-says-new-england-patriots-habitual-line-steppers