Tyson Chandler would have done a lot more in 3 years in the NCAA. He was so way ahead of WCS at the same age. I think Sam Dalembert would be a more likely projection.
Tyson Chandler didn't really develop until he got to New Orleans at the age of 24. When he was 23 he only played 26 minutes a game and averaged 5.3 points. Cauley-Stein is 21 now. Both Chandler and DeAndre took a long time to develop. It is good that WCS stayed in college 3 years otherwise it was unlikely he would positively contribute until after his rookie deal was over. Now that he has played more, I think he will be be fully established by the time his rookie contract is over.
Bummer, I deleted last post by accident ... it was something like this:
Tyson Chandler had established himself as one of the top interior defenders in the league by the time he was 22 (4th year) when he was playing under Scott Skiles in Chicago. Tyson led the Bulls the #2 defensive FG% + #2 defensive efficiency in the league. Tyson would have blossomed even sooner if not for a serious back injury he suffered in his 3rd year.
You could tell Tyson Chandler was special from the first moment you saw him in his rookie year. His combination of physical talent and mental characteristics separated him from other rookies. He was a leader. He inspired his teammates with his energy, hustle and competitive spirit. He loved doing the dirty work in the paint. Playing defense and going after loose balls. Tyson lacked the fundamentals to go along with his the physical and mental talent but you could clearly see he had something special about him. Heck, the photo journalists used to beg the coaching staff to put him in games more because they got all their best photos when Tyson was in the game because the whole team elevated their play from his energy and toughness.
I fully believe Tyson Chandler would have performed at a much higher level in the NCAA than WCS has done in his 3 years there if Tyson had of gone to college instead of going straight to the NBA.