The prevailing wisdom on this site seems to be that the Celtics need superstars at all costs. Either we hold on to Rondo and hope to pull off some free agent signing or big-time sign-and-trade for a disgruntled star, or you trade Rondo/let him walk, and hope your stockpile of young pieces and picks somehow yields at least one star, either via trade or development.
The more I look around the league, the more skeptical I am that the Celtics will be able to compete this way in the foreseeable future. For one, the chances are virtually nil that you can top the Cavs in top-end talent over the next few years, barring another defection by Lebron after two years (unlikely). Let's imagine for a moment that Rondo sticks around and is back to his pre-ACL self, one of our young players makes a leap to all-star level, and the C's pick up another big-name player along the way. What are the chances that this trio will be better than James, Irving, and Love?
If the Celtics hope to contend in the years ahead, they won't do it via stockpiling superstars. They'll have to duplicate what the Spurs did last year, or what the Pistons did in 2004. That is, build a team full of very good players who play as a team. The good news is that the NBA is more amenable to a team like this winning these days, thanks to the new illegal defense rules, which have forced a more open, passing-oriented, less star-centric offensive system. Also, Stevens has proven twice on the college level that he can take a well-coached, defensive-minded, team-oriented group of college players to the highest level. Let's hope he can reproduce some of that magic at the NBA level, because I don't really see any other way.