Author Topic: Cavs open to trading the #1 pick  (Read 10692 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Cavs open to trading the #1 pick
« Reply #45 on: May 21, 2014, 06:38:06 AM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52783
  • Tommy Points: 2568
Shouldn't the Cavs be open to trading Irving right now instead?

Imagine walking away from this draft with two of the Big Three, and then going into next season with crazy cap space.

That would be pretty cool.

Draft Wiggins. Trade Kyrie for #2 or #3 pick and draft Embiid or Exum as well.

Re: Cavs open to trading the #1 pick
« Reply #46 on: May 21, 2014, 07:23:28 AM »

Offline Birdman

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10299
  • Tommy Points: 465
I say they will offer #1 pick and some players for Love
C/PF-Horford, Baynes, Noel, Theis, Morris,
SF/SG- Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Smart, Semi, Clark
PG- Irving, Rozier, Larkin

Re: Cavs open to trading the #1 pick
« Reply #47 on: May 21, 2014, 08:06:44 AM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62683
  • Tommy Points: -25472
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Shouldn't the Cavs be open to trading Irving right now instead?

Imagine walking away from this draft with two of the Big Three, and then going into next season with crazy cap space.

That would be pretty cool.

Draft Wiggins. Trade Kyrie for #2 or #3 pick and draft Embiid or Exum as well.

Cool, perhaps, but it wouldn't make their team any better in the foreseeable future.  The chances of either player being better than Kyrie are small, especially in the case of Exum.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Cavs open to trading the #1 pick
« Reply #48 on: May 21, 2014, 08:14:59 AM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34522
  • Tommy Points: 1597
Someone who has been to Cleveland before, school me on the city. Is it really THAT bad?
I live in Cleveland, it is a very nice city, but it is very cold and snowy in the winter.  That said the biggest problem is not Cleveland it is the Cavaliers.  They are perhaps the most mismanaged franchise in all of sports over the last 15ish years. 

I mean they have done basically 4 things correctly during that 15ish year time and two of the four (drafting James and Irving) were no brainers.  The only other things they have done correctly were taking on Baron Davis for Mo Williams and getting LAC's unprotected 1st rounder in the process (which became Irving) and trading for Varejao about a month after the 2004 draft (when Varejao was picked).  The rest of the time has been debacle after debacle staring with perhaps the biggest blunder in recent NBA history in letting Boozer out of his contract to try and game the system only to have Boozer sign a massive contract with Utah and leave. 
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip

Re: Cavs open to trading the #1 pick
« Reply #49 on: May 21, 2014, 08:21:39 AM »

Offline bdm860

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6135
  • Tommy Points: 4624
Shouldn't the Cavs be open to trading Irving right now instead?

Imagine walking away from this draft with two of the Big Three, and then going into next season with crazy cap space.

That would be pretty cool.

Draft Wiggins. Trade Kyrie for #2 or #3 pick and draft Embiid or Exum as well.

And then they can repeat the process every 3 years after they've failed to build a contender around Wiggins and Embiid and they're threatening to walk in free agency, and they have the #1 pick again in 2017 or 2018...

Hey maybe the C's can be their trading partner in 2018, trading the #2 or #3 pick from Brooklyn in 2018 to add to their championship core of whoever Danny drafted and swindled from other teams by then.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2014, 08:39:35 AM by bdm860 »

After 18 months with their Bigs, the Littles were: 46% less likely to use illegal drugs, 27% less likely to use alcohol, 52% less likely to skip school, 37% less likely to skip a class

Re: Cavs open to trading the #1 pick
« Reply #50 on: May 21, 2014, 08:25:46 AM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62683
  • Tommy Points: -25472
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Someone who has been to Cleveland before, school me on the city. Is it really THAT bad?
I live in Cleveland, it is a very nice city, but it is very cold and snowy in the winter.  That said the biggest problem is not Cleveland it is the Cavaliers.  They are perhaps the most mismanaged franchise in all of sports over the last 15ish years. 

I mean they have done basically 4 things correctly during that 15ish year time and two of the four (drafting James and Irving) were no brainers.  The only other things they have done correctly were taking on Baron Davis for Mo Williams and getting LAC's unprotected 1st rounder in the process (which became Irving) and trading for Varejao about a month after the 2004 draft (when Varejao was picked).  The rest of the time has been debacle after debacle staring with perhaps the biggest blunder in recent NBA history in letting Boozer out of his contract to try and game the system only to have Boozer sign a massive contract with Utah and leave.

Chris Grant made a couple of other nice moves.  Getting a future Memphis #1 for taking on Wayne Ellington's contract was smart, as was the J.J. Hickson trade.  I liked the Deng move, although it was a waste with a coach as incompetent as Mike Brown.

Overall, though, I agree:  just poor management.  Bad draft picks; bad free agent signings; a terrible coach.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Cavs open to trading the #1 pick
« Reply #51 on: May 21, 2014, 08:33:07 AM »

Offline the_Bird

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
  • Tommy Points: 176

Re: Cavs open to trading the #1 pick
« Reply #52 on: May 21, 2014, 08:43:10 AM »

Offline crimson_stallion

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5964
  • Tommy Points: 875
The Cavs might move the #1 pick for a star veteran, because they want to win rather than get younger. They're not going to trade it for two lesser picks.

Bingo.

How about:

Rondo sends:
Rajon Rondo
Jared Sullinger OR Kelly Olynyk
2014 Pick #17

Cleveland sends:
Andersen Varejao
2014 Pick #1

Works according to trade machine:
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine

Cleveland can then start Rondo at PG (moving Irving to the SG spot) and trade Dion Waiters, who clearly doesn't mesh with Irving.

Rondo + Irving makes Cleveland instantly relevant.

Boston can then Draft:
* Embiid (rim protection) + Smart (replacement for Rondo) or
* Exum (replacement for Rondo) + Vonleh (rim protection) or
* Parker (volume scorer) + Vonleh (rim protector)

Not sure if Cleveland would be up for this, but I'd definately be happy to offer!

In a draft this deep, having two top 6 picks makes it pretty hard to go wrong...