0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: BleedGreen1989 on May 15, 2014, 04:05:11 PMQuote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 04:00:22 PMQuote from: Monkhouse on May 15, 2014, 03:51:13 PMQuote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 03:43:14 PMNo offense. But what would okafor solve?? He is injury prone and a short term fix , especially for a contender. Asik again a short term fix with no offense. Mozgov had a 29 rebound, 3 blocks, 20 point game last year. He destroyed bogut. He is a starter, just needs min on the courtOne game.Okafor is going to be heavily recruited by contenders that are looking to add an above average back up Center for around the MLE. I don't know where you think hes going to seriously get over 6 mil. I think 5 is his max with 2-3 extra years included. As for Asik, like I said, I agree. Hes awful offensively, and even Perkins seems to do better on offense. But Asik is a better defender than Mozgov, and is a better rebounder per 36.Hes also going to be the easiest to grab... TPE/Clippers pick, Bogans? Or something else in the mix? Mozgov is going to at least demand a first round pick, or a few second rounders, and I wouldn't give that for Mozgov who is also getting paid 4 mil per year...I do get your points. But Mozgov's offense plus decent defensive capabilities outweight what Asik can provide. Plus Asik is a short term rental. Don't let Mozgov's low rebounding #'s some games fool you. It's bc of Faried its lowerBut I agree if all it takes is the TPE and a future 2nd or something, to go after Asik 1st. But otherwise there are better options imoWe all saw what Aldridge did to Asik in the playoffs. Asik is a good defensive Center, but not elite and can't make things up on the offensive endWhy is Asik a short term rental?bc after next season he is a UFA.
Quote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 04:00:22 PMQuote from: Monkhouse on May 15, 2014, 03:51:13 PMQuote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 03:43:14 PMNo offense. But what would okafor solve?? He is injury prone and a short term fix , especially for a contender. Asik again a short term fix with no offense. Mozgov had a 29 rebound, 3 blocks, 20 point game last year. He destroyed bogut. He is a starter, just needs min on the courtOne game.Okafor is going to be heavily recruited by contenders that are looking to add an above average back up Center for around the MLE. I don't know where you think hes going to seriously get over 6 mil. I think 5 is his max with 2-3 extra years included. As for Asik, like I said, I agree. Hes awful offensively, and even Perkins seems to do better on offense. But Asik is a better defender than Mozgov, and is a better rebounder per 36.Hes also going to be the easiest to grab... TPE/Clippers pick, Bogans? Or something else in the mix? Mozgov is going to at least demand a first round pick, or a few second rounders, and I wouldn't give that for Mozgov who is also getting paid 4 mil per year...I do get your points. But Mozgov's offense plus decent defensive capabilities outweight what Asik can provide. Plus Asik is a short term rental. Don't let Mozgov's low rebounding #'s some games fool you. It's bc of Faried its lowerBut I agree if all it takes is the TPE and a future 2nd or something, to go after Asik 1st. But otherwise there are better options imoWe all saw what Aldridge did to Asik in the playoffs. Asik is a good defensive Center, but not elite and can't make things up on the offensive endWhy is Asik a short term rental?
Quote from: Monkhouse on May 15, 2014, 03:51:13 PMQuote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 03:43:14 PMNo offense. But what would okafor solve?? He is injury prone and a short term fix , especially for a contender. Asik again a short term fix with no offense. Mozgov had a 29 rebound, 3 blocks, 20 point game last year. He destroyed bogut. He is a starter, just needs min on the courtOne game.Okafor is going to be heavily recruited by contenders that are looking to add an above average back up Center for around the MLE. I don't know where you think hes going to seriously get over 6 mil. I think 5 is his max with 2-3 extra years included. As for Asik, like I said, I agree. Hes awful offensively, and even Perkins seems to do better on offense. But Asik is a better defender than Mozgov, and is a better rebounder per 36.Hes also going to be the easiest to grab... TPE/Clippers pick, Bogans? Or something else in the mix? Mozgov is going to at least demand a first round pick, or a few second rounders, and I wouldn't give that for Mozgov who is also getting paid 4 mil per year...I do get your points. But Mozgov's offense plus decent defensive capabilities outweight what Asik can provide. Plus Asik is a short term rental. Don't let Mozgov's low rebounding #'s some games fool you. It's bc of Faried its lowerBut I agree if all it takes is the TPE and a future 2nd or something, to go after Asik 1st. But otherwise there are better options imoWe all saw what Aldridge did to Asik in the playoffs. Asik is a good defensive Center, but not elite and can't make things up on the offensive end
Quote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 03:43:14 PMNo offense. But what would okafor solve?? He is injury prone and a short term fix , especially for a contender. Asik again a short term fix with no offense. Mozgov had a 29 rebound, 3 blocks, 20 point game last year. He destroyed bogut. He is a starter, just needs min on the courtOne game.Okafor is going to be heavily recruited by contenders that are looking to add an above average back up Center for around the MLE. I don't know where you think hes going to seriously get over 6 mil. I think 5 is his max with 2-3 extra years included. As for Asik, like I said, I agree. Hes awful offensively, and even Perkins seems to do better on offense. But Asik is a better defender than Mozgov, and is a better rebounder per 36.Hes also going to be the easiest to grab... TPE/Clippers pick, Bogans? Or something else in the mix? Mozgov is going to at least demand a first round pick, or a few second rounders, and I wouldn't give that for Mozgov who is also getting paid 4 mil per year...
No offense. But what would okafor solve?? He is injury prone and a short term fix , especially for a contender. Asik again a short term fix with no offense. Mozgov had a 29 rebound, 3 blocks, 20 point game last year. He destroyed bogut. He is a starter, just needs min on the court
Quote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 04:13:07 PMQuote from: BleedGreen1989 on May 15, 2014, 04:05:11 PMQuote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 04:00:22 PMQuote from: Monkhouse on May 15, 2014, 03:51:13 PMQuote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 03:43:14 PMNo offense. But what would okafor solve?? He is injury prone and a short term fix , especially for a contender. Asik again a short term fix with no offense. Mozgov had a 29 rebound, 3 blocks, 20 point game last year. He destroyed bogut. He is a starter, just needs min on the courtOne game.Okafor is going to be heavily recruited by contenders that are looking to add an above average back up Center for around the MLE. I don't know where you think hes going to seriously get over 6 mil. I think 5 is his max with 2-3 extra years included. As for Asik, like I said, I agree. Hes awful offensively, and even Perkins seems to do better on offense. But Asik is a better defender than Mozgov, and is a better rebounder per 36.Hes also going to be the easiest to grab... TPE/Clippers pick, Bogans? Or something else in the mix? Mozgov is going to at least demand a first round pick, or a few second rounders, and I wouldn't give that for Mozgov who is also getting paid 4 mil per year...I do get your points. But Mozgov's offense plus decent defensive capabilities outweight what Asik can provide. Plus Asik is a short term rental. Don't let Mozgov's low rebounding #'s some games fool you. It's bc of Faried its lowerBut I agree if all it takes is the TPE and a future 2nd or something, to go after Asik 1st. But otherwise there are better options imoWe all saw what Aldridge did to Asik in the playoffs. Asik is a good defensive Center, but not elite and can't make things up on the offensive endWhy is Asik a short term rental?bc after next season he is a UFA.I'd be happy to trade for him with the intention of giving him $10-12m/year on his next contract.
I like moranoe from Detroit he is a restricted free agent this year. currently plays PF but is 6 11 and can defiantly play center. he is 23 and big men generally take a little longer to reach there full potential. so his couple years of experience should help.
Quote from: Hawkeye199 on May 15, 2014, 04:38:15 PM I like moranoe from Detroit he is a restricted free agent this year. currently plays PF but is 6 11 and can defiantly play center. he is 23 and big men generally take a little longer to reach there full potential. so his couple years of experience should help.i like him also. But it will be difficult to come up a trade that works plus give him the money he wants.
Quote from: LooseCannon on May 15, 2014, 04:18:02 PMQuote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 04:13:07 PMQuote from: BleedGreen1989 on May 15, 2014, 04:05:11 PMQuote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 04:00:22 PMQuote from: Monkhouse on May 15, 2014, 03:51:13 PMQuote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 03:43:14 PMNo offense. But what would okafor solve?? He is injury prone and a short term fix , especially for a contender. Asik again a short term fix with no offense. Mozgov had a 29 rebound, 3 blocks, 20 point game last year. He destroyed bogut. He is a starter, just needs min on the courtOne game.Okafor is going to be heavily recruited by contenders that are looking to add an above average back up Center for around the MLE. I don't know where you think hes going to seriously get over 6 mil. I think 5 is his max with 2-3 extra years included. As for Asik, like I said, I agree. Hes awful offensively, and even Perkins seems to do better on offense. But Asik is a better defender than Mozgov, and is a better rebounder per 36.Hes also going to be the easiest to grab... TPE/Clippers pick, Bogans? Or something else in the mix? Mozgov is going to at least demand a first round pick, or a few second rounders, and I wouldn't give that for Mozgov who is also getting paid 4 mil per year...I do get your points. But Mozgov's offense plus decent defensive capabilities outweight what Asik can provide. Plus Asik is a short term rental. Don't let Mozgov's low rebounding #'s some games fool you. It's bc of Faried its lowerBut I agree if all it takes is the TPE and a future 2nd or something, to go after Asik 1st. But otherwise there are better options imoWe all saw what Aldridge did to Asik in the playoffs. Asik is a good defensive Center, but not elite and can't make things up on the offensive endWhy is Asik a short term rental?bc after next season he is a UFA.I'd be happy to trade for him with the intention of giving him $10-12m/year on his next contract.no way he is worth 10-12 million a year. Again did you not see what Aldrige did to him? And then did you see how old father Duncan/Splitter neutralized Aldridge?Duncan and Splitter were able to do some damage on the offensive end also got Aldrige tired. When you don't have to defend a guy like Asik, you can conserve your energy. His PnR defense and iq in general is mediocre
Quote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 04:23:53 PMQuote from: LooseCannon on May 15, 2014, 04:18:02 PMQuote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 04:13:07 PMQuote from: BleedGreen1989 on May 15, 2014, 04:05:11 PMQuote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 04:00:22 PMQuote from: Monkhouse on May 15, 2014, 03:51:13 PMQuote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 03:43:14 PMNo offense. But what would okafor solve?? He is injury prone and a short term fix , especially for a contender. Asik again a short term fix with no offense. Mozgov had a 29 rebound, 3 blocks, 20 point game last year. He destroyed bogut. He is a starter, just needs min on the courtOne game.Okafor is going to be heavily recruited by contenders that are looking to add an above average back up Center for around the MLE. I don't know where you think hes going to seriously get over 6 mil. I think 5 is his max with 2-3 extra years included. As for Asik, like I said, I agree. Hes awful offensively, and even Perkins seems to do better on offense. But Asik is a better defender than Mozgov, and is a better rebounder per 36.Hes also going to be the easiest to grab... TPE/Clippers pick, Bogans? Or something else in the mix? Mozgov is going to at least demand a first round pick, or a few second rounders, and I wouldn't give that for Mozgov who is also getting paid 4 mil per year...I do get your points. But Mozgov's offense plus decent defensive capabilities outweight what Asik can provide. Plus Asik is a short term rental. Don't let Mozgov's low rebounding #'s some games fool you. It's bc of Faried its lowerBut I agree if all it takes is the TPE and a future 2nd or something, to go after Asik 1st. But otherwise there are better options imoWe all saw what Aldridge did to Asik in the playoffs. Asik is a good defensive Center, but not elite and can't make things up on the offensive endWhy is Asik a short term rental?bc after next season he is a UFA.I'd be happy to trade for him with the intention of giving him $10-12m/year on his next contract.no way he is worth 10-12 million a year. Again did you not see what Aldrige did to him? And then did you see how old father Duncan/Splitter neutralized Aldridge?Duncan and Splitter were able to do some damage on the offensive end also got Aldrige tired. When you don't have to defend a guy like Asik, you can conserve your energy. His PnR defense and iq in general is mediocreI've never heard his PnR defense is mediocre.http://www.nba.com/rockets/news/film-session-omer-asikhttp://www.sbnation.com/nba/2013/10/15/4830936/omer-asik-defense-video-breakdown-houston-rocketshttp://hoopshabit.com/2013/04/12/houston-rockets-is-omer-asik-still-a-quality-defender/Words like "elite" and "brilliant" pop up repeatedly.
Quote from: triboy16f on May 15, 2014, 04:42:30 PMQuote from: Hawkeye199 on May 15, 2014, 04:38:15 PM I like moranoe from Detroit he is a restricted free agent this year. currently plays PF but is 6 11 and can defiantly play center. he is 23 and big men generally take a little longer to reach there full potential. so his couple years of experience should help.i like him also. But it will be difficult to come up a trade that works plus give him the money he wants.Trade exception plus a pick?
This Monroe V. Sully debate is really actually fascinating to consider which incited me to do my due diligence and get some actual quantifiable numbers to support either or. Age:Sully: 22Monroe: 23Basic Measurements (NBA Combine):Sully: 6?9?, 7?1.25? wing, 8?9.5? standing, Max Vert 31?Monroe: 6?11?, 7?2.25? wing, 9?0.5? standing reach, Max Vert 29?Contested REB %:Sully: 12th in NBA (bigs), 45.8%Monroe: 22nd in NBA, 44.2%Total REB %Sully: 60.9%Monroe: 57.1%Rim Protection FG%Sully: 53.9% 10th worst, Monroe: 51.2% 24th worstBoth have 7 FGA defended per gameBLK/STLSully: 0.7/0.5Monroe: 0.6/1.1Old School Box Stats (Pts-Rbs-Asst):Sully: 13.8-8.1-1.6Monroe: 15.2-9.3-2.1Shooting %s:Sully: 42.7% FG, 26.9% 3pt, 77.8%FTMonroe: 49.7% FG, No 3s attempted, 65.7% FTPER:Sully: 16.42Monroe: 18.16
If we don't get Embid, I'm hoping that Milwaukee drafts him and is willing to trade Sanders to us at a decent price. He may be trouble, but is a very talented guy who in a good organization like the Celtics should be able to get his act together.