And how exactly is he worthy of first overall pick? He "erupts" for one game and drags through others. How is he different than Jeff Green, who drops 40 one game and then around 20 for the next 10 games and then repeats?
The kid is averaging 16.0 points in college, against much much much lesser competition than what he will have in the NBA. It's not like he makes up for it in other ways. He's averaging 5.8 rebounds and 1.6 assists.
It still baffles me how people believe he is worth wasting the first overall pick on.
In comparison, Jabari Parker is averaging 18.8 points along with 9.0 rebounds and 1.3 assists per game. He averages more blocks, less fouls and better shooting percentage in less minutes than Wiggins.
At 6 feet 8 inches, Wiggins gets just 5.8 rebounds while Parker gets 9.0 rebounds. Parker's got better field goal percentage and better three point percentage.
For one, Wiggins is seen as a 2/3 while Parker is a 3/4, so yes, Parker should get more rebounds. Embiid is a perimeter defender, whereas Parker is in the paint much more often. But also, Wiggins has to compete with Embiid for rebounds -- Embiid gets 27% of defensive rebounds -- it'd be foolish for Wiggins to crash the boards with Embiid there to vacuum up the rebounds.
For two, Kansas has played a significantly tougher schedule than Duke. Kansas's schedule is arguably the toughest ever in college basketball. It's not like Duke's played nobodies, but Kansas played a ridiculous non-conference schedule.
For three, yes Parker scores more, but uses up 31% of his team's possessions, whereas Wiggins uses 26%. Wiggins is more efficient, having the higher offensive rating.
Honestly, if you haven't seen Wiggins in three months, or only watched the first half of the Duke-Kansas game, and not the second half, I guess I can see where you're coming from. But Wiggins has shown up pretty much every night for months -- Parker was the one who disappeared for a few weeks in January.
Again, Parker is a great player. I'd be thrilled if he wound up on the Celtics. But Wiggins is simply better. He has the athleticism that everyone gushes about, and the basketball skill that will allow him to utilize it. When his shot is off, he can alter a game defensively. Parker just can't.