I'm just curious.....what kind of a coach says to his best player up for free agency in a year "Hey. I know your whole family is here and it's your birthday and you want to be with them and you're not even supposed to play the Kings tomorrow.....but man it is just really really really important that you be there to watch a completely meaningless game"?
Who does or says that?
I also don't follow this line of thinking that Rondo has butted heads with every coach he ever had. I mean how come nobody ever says coaches have butted heads everywhere they've gone? You mean they kept all their players happy all the time?
I bet if you asked Doc or Brad.....hey. We could trade Rondo for ...idk...Mike Conley or Tony Parker straight up they'd yell "Noooooooooo! Are you out of your mind?!"
40 pgs are better? Shoulda gone with 15. Then we might have actually thought a real live scout said that.
your wrong imo. He is the captain.
What's next, Jeff Green can miss a game when his birthday comes? Then Pressey?
Even though Pressey is not at the level Rondo is, if you as a coach tell him no you can't, then what? It's like a **** boss giving favoritism to that one hot chick on your team, and blasting others when they do something minor
Stevens is a fair guy. Rookie coach or not, he knows what kind of system and rules he wants in place so that the ship can navigate properly.
Have you been following the story at all? Rondo didn't miss the game because it was his birthday. They told him not to play because it was the second half of a back to back.
Exactly. He already had the day off. They didn't want him to come into work. They wanted him to come in to watch other people work.
it's more about team camaraderie more than anything. even if guys don't play, they still usually travel with the team (unless they're getting treatment or something) and sit on the bench in a suit.
anyway, i don't care for this issue. for one, it seems petty (although i could be wrong and the issue might actually bigger than is being let on), and the other is that stories like this likely end up with having so much spin on it, for better or worse, that the final story that surfaces ends up being so garbled and far from the actual truth.
if Rondo leaves for FA (or is traded) and whispers of how he was difficult to deal with or that he wasn't always there for the team, etc. etc., then it's possible that this story gains some weight as to one of those examples/incidents. Until then though, i don't think there's much to see here.