Author Topic: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green  (Read 33708 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #15 on: February 25, 2014, 10:45:51 AM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Rondo has to figure it out.  He has not had success without the big three.

Next year its his last yr before contract renewal. He will have to play better. Danny will give him a better team

If no progression rondo wont be resigned and traded by next years deadline. Maybe at this rate rondo will be the one who wants out

Rondo has gone from playing with the big three to playing with one of the worst rosters in the game. He is continuing to improve each game he plays. It is difficult to judge his game given how poor this roster is.

The lineup is not any worse vs hawks, suns, wizards

We have won majority of the games without rondo this year. One would think with  rondo we would do better. The injury excuse is dying game by game

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #16 on: February 25, 2014, 10:49:40 AM »

Offline TwinTower14

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1119
  • Tommy Points: 48
You didn't answer my question.  What do you think?
Are you really asking this? Chris Paul won 38 and 39 games in his rookie and sophomore year in Oklahoma with pretty much David West and a collection of spare parts.

38 games in his rookie season, 20 game improvement from the previous year without Paul....

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #17 on: February 25, 2014, 10:50:35 AM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
I wasn't aware that anyone really expected the C's to be 'good enough.' I think that, had everything broken right (or, not broken right), we could've made the 8th seed.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #18 on: February 25, 2014, 10:51:11 AM »

Offline TwinTower14

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1119
  • Tommy Points: 48
Rondo has to figure it out.  He has not had success without the big three.

Next year its his last yr before contract renewal. He will have to play better. Danny will give him a better team

If no progression rondo wont be resigned and traded by next years deadline. Maybe at this rate rondo will be the one who wants out

Rondo has gone from playing with the big three to playing with one of the worst rosters in the game. He is continuing to improve each game he plays. It is difficult to judge his game given how poor this roster is.

The lineup is not any worse vs hawks, suns, wizards

We have won majority of the games without rondo this year. One would think with  rondo we would do better. The injury excuse is dying game by game

been saying this all year, Rondo needs to be surrounded by shooters more than any PG in the league.  This team has zero...

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #19 on: February 25, 2014, 10:55:17 AM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33322
  • Tommy Points: 1747
  • What a Pub Should Be
You didn't answer my question.  What do you think?
Are you really asking this? Chris Paul won 38 and 39 games in his rookie and sophomore year in Oklahoma with pretty much David West and a collection of spare parts.

Well, I posed it, didn't I?

Of course, Paul played 78 games that first year and wasn't showing up in the middle of the season coming off on ACL surgery.  But 13 games is 13 games, right?

(Btw, I do think Paul is a superior PG to Rondo.  I just don't think anyone would've done a much better job with this surrounding cast)


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #20 on: February 25, 2014, 10:59:30 AM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
You didn't answer my question.  What do you think?
Are you really asking this? Chris Paul won 38 and 39 games in his rookie and sophomore year in Oklahoma with pretty much David West and a collection of spare parts.

Well, I posed it, didn't I?

Of course, Paul played 78 games that first year and wasn't showing up in the middle of the season coming off on ACL surgery.  But 13 games is 13 games, right?

(Btw, I do think Paul is a superior PG to Rondo.  I just don't think anyone would've done a much better job with this surrounding cast)

Woudn't it make more sense to compare Paul's season after knee surgery with Rondo's? Since they both had knee surgeries in February?

http://bkref.com/tiny/4fboQ

Small sample size with Rondo, obviously, but if anyone has the time they could go through Paul's first 13 games of that season and do the stats work.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #21 on: February 25, 2014, 11:00:13 AM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
You didn't answer my question.  What do you think?
Are you really asking this? Chris Paul won 38 and 39 games in his rookie and sophomore year in Oklahoma with pretty much David West and a collection of spare parts.

Well, I posed it, didn't I?

Of course, Paul played 78 games that first year and wasn't showing up in the middle of the season coming off on ACL surgery.  But 13 games is 13 games, right?

(Btw, I do think Paul is a superior PG to Rondo.  I just don't think anyone would've done a much better job with this surrounding cast)
13 games is 13 games. But what I've seen in these 13 games is not a stud PG who makes everyone better, but a deliberate, predictable, and inefficient guy who looks to pass on every play because he has no reliable scoring moves.

Perhaps part of it is the injury, but I just don't see the situation translating into him being the best player on a good team. This isn't to say he can't still be valuable. It's just that you have to give him one Kevin Durant in the lineup instead of 4 other Jeff Greens, if you catch my drift.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #22 on: February 25, 2014, 11:03:13 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club


The lineup is not any worse vs hawks, suns, wizards


No, it really is not. All those teams have significantly more talent than the Celtics have.

Rondo hasn't gotten this team to win because the team stinks. Its being managed from the top to lose and the coach has a farce of an offensive system installed that takes away from Rondo's total effectiveness as a player.

I just do not understand those that are so gung ho to get young, unproven, college players on this team next year and want Rondo gone. Rondo is the exact type player you want running an offense with young players. He will demand they know their roles and he will make them better in every way offensively.

Let Rondo get back to 100% and play a whole preseason and season in a better offensive system and people will see that Rondo is the guy you want around all those unproven rookie and sophomore players that you have been drooling over playing in the NCAA and Europe this year.

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #23 on: February 25, 2014, 11:03:55 AM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Rondo has to figure it out.  He has not had success without the big three.

Next year its his last yr before contract renewal. He will have to play better. Danny will give him a better team

If no progression rondo wont be resigned and traded by next years deadline. Maybe at this rate rondo will be the one who wants out


Rondo has gone from playing with the big three to playing with one of the worst rosters in the game. He is continuing to improve each game he plays. It is difficult to judge his game given how poor this roster is.

The lineup is not any worse vs hawks, suns, wizards

We have won majority of the games without rondo this year. One would think with  rondo we would do better. The injury excuse is dying game by game

been saying this all year, Rondo needs to be surrounded by shooters more than any PG in the league.  This team has zero...

And a rim protector. Basically a kg, pp and ray allen

Rondo is not a max player. He should of taken the 2 yr offer while he had a chance

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #24 on: February 25, 2014, 11:04:50 AM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33322
  • Tommy Points: 1747
  • What a Pub Should Be
You didn't answer my question.  What do you think?
Are you really asking this? Chris Paul won 38 and 39 games in his rookie and sophomore year in Oklahoma with pretty much David West and a collection of spare parts.

Well, I posed it, didn't I?

Of course, Paul played 78 games that first year and wasn't showing up in the middle of the season coming off on ACL surgery.  But 13 games is 13 games, right?

(Btw, I do think Paul is a superior PG to Rondo.  I just don't think anyone would've done a much better job with this surrounding cast)
13 games is 13 games. But what I've seen in these 13 games is not a stud PG who makes everyone better, but a deliberate, predictable, and inefficient guy who looks to pass on every play because he has no reliable scoring moves.

Perhaps part of it is the injury, but I just don't see the situation translating into him being the best player on a good team. This isn't to say he can't still be valuable. It's just that you have to give him one Kevin Durant in the lineup instead of 4 other Jeff Greens, if you catch my drift.

And I would tend to agree.  I've felt that he could be a  #2 guy on a contender but not the proverbial "alpha dog".

He badly needs a scoring wing that can create his own offense.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #25 on: February 25, 2014, 11:05:11 AM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867


The lineup is not any worse vs hawks, suns, wizards


No, it really is not. All those teams have significantly more talent than the Celtics have.

Rondo hasn't gotten this team to win because the team stinks. Its being managed from the top to lose and the coach has a farce of an offensive system installed that takes away from Rondo's total effectiveness as a player.

I just do not understand those that are so gung ho to get young, unproven, college players on this team next year and want Rondo gone. Rondo is the exact type player you want running an offense with young players. He will demand they know their roles and he will make them better in every way offensively.

Let Rondo get back to 100% and play a whole preseason and season in a better offensive system and people will see that Rondo is the guy you want around all those unproven rookie and sophomore players that you have been drooling over playing in the NCAA and Europe this year.

They dont have significantly more talent. Look at their rosters

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #26 on: February 25, 2014, 11:09:47 AM »

Offline LilRip

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6987
  • Tommy Points: 411
Rondo has to figure it out.  He has not had success without the big three.

Next year its his last yr before contract renewal. He will have to play better. Danny will give him a better team

If no progression rondo wont be resigned and traded by next years deadline. Maybe at this rate rondo will be the one who wants out


Rondo has gone from playing with the big three to playing with one of the worst rosters in the game. He is continuing to improve each game he plays. It is difficult to judge his game given how poor this roster is.

The lineup is not any worse vs hawks, suns, wizards

We have won majority of the games without rondo this year. One would think with  rondo we would do better. The injury excuse is dying game by game

been saying this all year, Rondo needs to be surrounded by shooters more than any PG in the league.  This team has zero...

And a rim protector. Basically a kg, pp and ray allen

Rondo is not a max player. He should of taken the 2 yr offer while he had a chance

i'm pretty sure he could take the place of an Allen (#3), and instead of shooting and spacing, he provides playmaking and defense.

The tricky part is finding the new KG and PP.
- LilRip

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #27 on: February 25, 2014, 11:15:23 AM »

Offline European NBA fan

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 984
  • Tommy Points: 141
You didn't answer my question.  What do you think?
Are you really asking this? Chris Paul won 38 and 39 games in his rookie and sophomore year in Oklahoma with pretty much David West and a collection of spare parts.

Well, I posed it, didn't I?

Of course, Paul played 78 games that first year and wasn't showing up in the middle of the season coming off on ACL surgery.  But 13 games is 13 games, right?

(Btw, I do think Paul is a superior PG to Rondo.  I just don't think anyone would've done a much better job with this surrounding cast)

Woudn't it make more sense to compare Paul's season after knee surgery with Rondo's? Since they both had knee surgeries in February?

http://bkref.com/tiny/4fboQ

Small sample size with Rondo, obviously, but if anyone has the time they could go through Paul's first 13 games of that season and do the stats work.

You have listed the wrong season. Chris Paul was out for less than two months and came back the same season (2009-2010, with significantly worse stats in those final seven games after the injury). Rondo was out for a year.

Chris Paul pre-injury:
20.4 pts / 11.2 assists / 4.6 rebounds / 2.3 steals (50.8 FG%)
Chris Paul post-injury:
9.4 pts / 8.0 assists / 2.4 rebounds / 1.4 steals (40.0 FG%)
« Last Edit: February 25, 2014, 11:25:39 AM by European NBA fan »

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #28 on: February 25, 2014, 11:23:16 AM »

Offline Mr October

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6129
  • Tommy Points: 247
Rondo has to figure it out.  He has not had success without the big three.

Next year its his last yr before contract renewal. He will have to play better. Danny will give him a better team

If no progression rondo wont be resigned and traded by next years deadline. Maybe at this rate rondo will be the one who wants out

Rondo has gone from playing with the big three to playing with one of the worst rosters in the game. He is continuing to improve each game he plays. It is difficult to judge his game given how poor this roster is.

The lineup is not any worse vs hawks, suns, wizards

We have won majority of the games without rondo this year. One would think with  rondo we would do better. The injury excuse is dying game by game

I know you have been anti rondo for a while, and i am pro rondo. But you are right in that the injury excuse can only go so far. If rondo wants to be the man, the focal point, the leader, the max payed player, he needs to attack the basket.

Watching him setup mediocre shooters with open outside shots is brutal to watch. If rondo requires elite shooters around him, then he celtics need to focus those max contracts on the Kevin love, Bradley beal, Andrew wiggins types.

Perhaps rondo has not been underpaid throughout his current contract. Perhaps 10-12 per year is right on the money. If he doesn't improve much by the end of the year, and doesn't indicate a willingness to sign an extension this summer, i am becoming more open to trading him this summer, or early next season.

I want to see rondo improve and stay. But i can understand your frustration. And i would be very nervous about paying him the max.

Re: Celtics actually not 'good enough' with Rondo and Green
« Reply #29 on: February 25, 2014, 11:25:26 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club


The lineup is not any worse vs hawks, suns, wizards


No, it really is not. All those teams have significantly more talent than the Celtics have.

Rondo hasn't gotten this team to win because the team stinks. Its being managed from the top to lose and the coach has a farce of an offensive system installed that takes away from Rondo's total effectiveness as a player.

I just do not understand those that are so gung ho to get young, unproven, college players on this team next year and want Rondo gone. Rondo is the exact type player you want running an offense with young players. He will demand they know their roles and he will make them better in every way offensively.

Let Rondo get back to 100% and play a whole preseason and season in a better offensive system and people will see that Rondo is the guy you want around all those unproven rookie and sophomore players that you have been drooling over playing in the NCAA and Europe this year.

They dont have significantly more talent. Look at their rosters
Why is it that when people disagree with you you tell them to watch a game or look at a roster or go see a player?

Do you really think people just make this stuff up about opinions different than yours without seeing teams, rosters or players play?

I have seen the rosters of those teams and I would rather have the roster that those teams have than the Celtics because they have much better and more talent.