Author Topic: Chris Johnson  (Read 7984 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Chris Johnson
« Reply #15 on: January 22, 2014, 12:21:23 AM »

Offline celticslove

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1760
  • Tommy Points: 188
He's like the left handed/ better version of Marshon Brooks. hahaha

Naww. Doesn't look it. Brooks has handles and scoring, this Chris Johnson guy seems to rely on his hustle and has a weak right hand (from the little I've seen).

But young SGs wearing the Celtic number 12 have gotten better and better. Von Wafer --> Brooks --> Chris Johnson. Maybe if we keep at it we'll get a franchise player eventually with number 12.
comon naw don't forget the blur... not exactly young but has good bball IQ... :D

Re: Chris Johnson
« Reply #16 on: January 22, 2014, 12:51:15 AM »

Offline green147

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 218
  • Tommy Points: 17
I love what Chris Johnson did today, hope he can keep it up.  But, if we're giving another D-league guard a shot I'd much rather see Seth Curry out there than Vander blue.

Re: Chris Johnson
« Reply #17 on: January 22, 2014, 01:54:40 AM »

Offline blink

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19680
  • Tommy Points: 1622
He's like the left handed/ better version of Marshon Brooks. hahaha

Naww. Doesn't look it. Brooks has handles and scoring, this Chris Johnson guy seems to rely on his hustle and has a weak right hand (from the little I've seen).

But young SGs wearing the Celtic number 12 have gotten better and better. Von Wafer --> Brooks --> Chris Johnson. Maybe if we keep at it we'll get a franchise player eventually with number 12.

From what I saw of Brooks this year, his ball handling skills weren't very good.  He is a good shooter, but good ball handler, not so much.

I like CJ more after one game than anything I saw from Brooks here.
  CJ looked like he cared.

Actually Brooks does have some pretty good handles-- that along with scoring are his only true strengths. It's tough to judge Brooks much based upon this year, because he hardly played, but if you go back to his rookie yr in Jersey, he had plenty of playing time to put his handles on display.

One memory that does come to mind of Brooks and his ball-handling this yr is a game where he was playing in garbage time (obviously) and took the ball coast to coast, with a nasty behind the back crossover, right before laying it in. Not sure if anyone remembers that play. I can't think of many other examples of his ball-handling skills this yr, cause he played so sparingly.

I absolutely agree with you though, on the fact that Chris Johnson had a better game tonight than any performance Brooks had all season. Although he probably just about matched Brooks season high for minutes played tonight too haha.

I just remember him playing against the clips earlier this year fumbling the ball around a number of times when I was watching.  He had more turnovers than assists as a celtic.  He just didn't show any skills worth keeping unfortunately.  He also never seemed very into the games.  Maybe it is just my perception, but I never sensed a 'team-first' attitude from him at all.

Good luck to him in GS.

Good luck to Chris here in Boston.  Maybe with two guards traded, and two more out with injuries CJ will get a chance at meaningful minutes in the next week or two.  His chance to impress DA.

Re: Chris Johnson
« Reply #18 on: January 22, 2014, 02:18:30 AM »

Offline RRNoLookPass

  • Joe Mazzulla
  • Posts: 128
  • Tommy Points: 15
He's like the left handed/ better version of Marshon Brooks. hahaha

Naww. Doesn't look it. Brooks has handles and scoring, this Chris Johnson guy seems to rely on his hustle and has a weak right hand (from the little I've seen).

But young SGs wearing the Celtic number 12 have gotten better and better. Von Wafer --> Brooks --> Chris Johnson. Maybe if we keep at it we'll get a franchise player eventually with number 12.

From what I saw of Brooks this year, his ball handling skills weren't very good.  He is a good shooter, but good ball handler, not so much.

I like CJ more after one game than anything I saw from Brooks here.
  CJ looked like he cared.

Actually Brooks does have some pretty good handles-- that along with scoring are his only true strengths. It's tough to judge Brooks much based upon this year, because he hardly played, but if you go back to his rookie yr in Jersey, he had plenty of playing time to put his handles on display.

One memory that does come to mind of Brooks and his ball-handling this yr is a game where he was playing in garbage time (obviously) and took the ball coast to coast, with a nasty behind the back crossover, right before laying it in. Not sure if anyone remembers that play. I can't think of many other examples of his ball-handling skills this yr, cause he played so sparingly.

I absolutely agree with you though, on the fact that Chris Johnson had a better game tonight than any performance Brooks had all season. Although he probably just about matched Brooks season high for minutes played tonight too haha.

I just remember him playing against the clips earlier this year fumbling the ball around a number of times when I was watching.  He had more turnovers than assists as a celtic.  He just didn't show any skills worth keeping unfortunately.  He also never seemed very into the games.  Maybe it is just my perception, but I never sensed a 'team-first' attitude from him at all.

Good luck to him in GS.

Good luck to Chris here in Boston.  Maybe with two guards traded, and two more out with injuries CJ will get a chance at meaningful minutes in the next week or two.  His chance to impress DA.

Yeah, I believe that about Brooks' assist to turnover ration. He certainly is not a good passer. When I said Brooks has some pretty good handles, I meant dribbling/ball-handling...that's mainly why he is a decent scorer on iso plays & can get his shot off.

As for CJ, he definitely should have his chance at mins this week. It's crazy to think our season-long logjam at SG is so depleted now. Lee gone, Brooks & Crawfish gone, Bogie sent home, and now Avery & Bayless are both hurt. All within a cpl weeks. We went from 5 SGs, thinned it down to a 2 SG rotation, and now we have 1 D-Leaguer holding down the fort, with another on the way, at least til Bradley & Bayless are back.

This is truly a golden opportunity for Chris Johnson to prove himself. I'm sure Green & maybe Wallace (uggh) will take up some of the mins at SG, but there will be plenty of mins to go around until AB & JB come back. Sometimes it just works out that way, and players who put in the dirty work in the D-League end up getting snatched up & put into a great situation.

Let's hope maybe Danny fished himself a nice catch out of the D-League.

Re: Chris Johnson
« Reply #19 on: January 22, 2014, 08:29:31 AM »

Offline pokeKingCurtis

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3733
  • Tommy Points: 280
comon naw don't forget the blur... not exactly young but has good bball IQ... :D

Some players I will never forget. Pierce and KG obviously. Rondo. Barbosa is up there - true professional. Add Hump to that list. I have a long list.


Chris Johnson!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wvlSpaNQqQ

Tried looking him up on Draftexpress...got the other one haha (as in the 6'11 Chris Johnson's reports ended up on the 6'5 one's player page).

But, hey, while (from what I've seen) NBADraft seems to sacrifice depth for volume (they update their draft...all the time), they are good at breadth.

http://www.nbadraft.net/players/chris-johnson

What he's done today seems consistent with the report. Seems like he's got the talent and no glaring weaknesses but needed a few things to click (or maybe I'm just completely off base here).

Re: Chris Johnson
« Reply #20 on: January 22, 2014, 09:07:22 AM »

Offline chambers

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7483
  • Tommy Points: 943
  • Boston Celtics= Championships, nothing less.
I'm happy for him.
Let him play and build up some value after we sign him.
Certainly held his own against the Heat.
Keep that three point shooting up and he's a perfect Courtney Lee replacement.
"We are lucky we have a very patient GM that isn't willing to settle for being good and coming close. He wants to win a championship and we have the potential to get there still with our roster and assets."

quoting 'Greg B' on RealGM after 2017 trade deadline.
Read that last line again. One more time.

Re: Chris Johnson
« Reply #21 on: January 22, 2014, 09:15:08 AM »

Offline Dog_Lover106

  • Sam Hauser
  • Posts: 156
  • Tommy Points: 12
I love what Chris Johnson did today, hope he can keep it up.  But, if we're giving another D-league guard a shot I'd much rather see Seth Curry out there than Vander blue.
Would rather have Blue. IMO, they need his size. Curry is going to have a tough time matching up at the two.

Re: Chris Johnson
« Reply #22 on: January 22, 2014, 09:23:21 AM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
I love what Chris Johnson did today, hope he can keep it up.  But, if we're giving another D-league guard a shot I'd much rather see Seth Curry out there than Vander blue.
Would rather have Blue. IMO, they need his size. Curry is going to have a tough time matching up at the two.

Johnson is better imo. More well rounded game. Blue is like a taller AB with shorter wingspan. He has to be chuck alot of shots to be effective