Author Topic: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)  (Read 8463 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #15 on: December 28, 2013, 04:23:57 PM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
I'm pretty lukewarm on Green, but he is too valuable/talented to be used as a salary dump.

This.

Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #16 on: December 28, 2013, 05:08:24 PM »

Offline dreamgreen

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3558
  • Tommy Points: 182
If they throw in  this years first sign me up. We dump him right after the trade. We would instantly become worse. get a better pick and have cap room and/or be able to use our TE.

Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #17 on: December 28, 2013, 06:15:36 PM »

Offline rocknrollforyoursoul

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10153
  • Tommy Points: 348
I think attempting to move Wallace, Lee, or even Bass for Bynum, even at the expense of a heavily protected future 1st round pick would be a move worth considering. Especially if it involves Wallace and Lee.

(Wallace+Lee for Bynum+Henry Sims works BTW)

But I think Jeff Green holds more value to us than just a salary dump at this point. Not a lot of viable starting 3's in the league, and Green has shown the ability to at the least be that.

Agreed on all points

Right.

Wallace, Lee or Bass? Sure.

Green? Absolutely not.

Cleveland signed their way into this mess and they have zero leverage. They deserve nothing of ongoing value to unload Bynum.

Hear, hear.

Teams who sign injury-prone headcases (who missed the entire previous season) for $12 MILLION A YEAR(!) aren't in any position to ask for, or get, anything like a first-round pick.
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.'

You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body.

C.S. Lewis

Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #18 on: December 28, 2013, 06:20:30 PM »

Offline KGs Knee

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12765
  • Tommy Points: 1546
I think attempting to move Wallace, Lee, or even Bass for Bynum, even at the expense of a heavily protected future 1st round pick would be a move worth considering. Especially if it involves Wallace and Lee.

(Wallace+Lee for Bynum+Henry Sims works BTW)

But I think Jeff Green holds more value to us than just a salary dump at this point. Not a lot of viable starting 3's in the league, and Green has shown the ability to at the least be that.

Agreed on all points

Right.

Wallace, Lee or Bass? Sure.

Green? Absolutely not.

Cleveland signed their way into this mess and they have zero leverage. They deserve nothing of ongoing value to unload Bynum.

Hear, hear.

Teams who sign injury-prone headcases (who missed the entire previous season) for $12 MILLION A YEAR(!) aren't in any position to ask for, or get, anything like a first-round pick.

You do realize Cleveland only guaranteed Bynum $6m of that $12m, right?  Next year is fully non-guaranteed.

If the C's we're to trade for him they could cut him immediately and not owe him another dime.  The C's could cut quite a bit of salary from their books for this season and next.  That is usually worth a 1st round pick.

Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #19 on: December 28, 2013, 06:23:12 PM »

Online jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13756
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
I think attempting to move Wallace, Lee, or even Bass for Bynum, even at the expense of a heavily protected future 1st round pick would be a move worth considering. Especially if it involves Wallace and Lee.

(Wallace+Lee for Bynum+Henry Sims works BTW)

But I think Jeff Green holds more value to us than just a salary dump at this point. Not a lot of viable starting 3's in the league, and Green has shown the ability to at the least be that.

Agreed on all points

Right.

Wallace, Lee or Bass? Sure.

Green? Absolutely not.

Cleveland signed their way into this mess and they have zero leverage. They deserve nothing of ongoing value to unload Bynum.

Hear, hear.

Teams who sign injury-prone headcases (who missed the entire previous season) for $12 MILLION A YEAR(!) aren't in any position to ask for, or get, anything like a first-round pick.

I don't understand why anybody would think that Cleveland would be willing to give up anything of value or take on bad contracts. All they need to do is just cut the guy before Jan. 7th and they are off the hook forever. By taking on salary for the rest of the season (or future seasons), they are doing whoever may trade with them a favor.

Unless they are getting something in return, they have no reason to trade him. Somebody else will just sign him for the remainder of the season after he clears waivers.

Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #20 on: December 28, 2013, 07:54:48 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20105
  • Tommy Points: 1331
I would not trade Olynyk for Bynum dude is shot!

Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #21 on: December 28, 2013, 11:48:09 PM »

Offline aporel#18

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2332
  • Tommy Points: 170
Danny should offer Wallace and a top 50 protected 2016 second rounder... and tell the Cavs "at that price I'm cutting me throat!"  ;D

Bonum pls


Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #22 on: December 28, 2013, 11:59:34 PM »

Offline LatterDayCelticsfan

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2257
  • Tommy Points: 176
  • Ruto Must Go!
If salary dumping is the idea, why not send out Hump  for Bynum?  We cut him and reduce the wage bill by 6 million straight away while Cleveland score 12 million in expiring contracts.
Ruto Must Go!

Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #23 on: December 29, 2013, 12:24:44 AM »

Offline manl_lui

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6571
  • Tommy Points: 427
NO WAY! I do not trust Bynum's knee's one bit to make that trade

Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #24 on: December 29, 2013, 12:34:10 AM »

Offline Lucky17

  • DKC Commish
  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16021
  • Tommy Points: 2352
If salary dumping is the idea, why not send out Hump  for Bynum?  We cut him and reduce the wage bill by 6 million straight away while Cleveland score 12 million in expiring contracts.

Not a bad idea. Seems like Cleveland is a little thin at PF, too. They could probably use Humphries.
DKC League is now on reddit!: http://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague

Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #25 on: December 29, 2013, 12:36:33 AM »

Offline ImShakHeIsShaq

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7739
  • Tommy Points: 804
People always want people who could do work, look at Bynum, you're just giving Green away (Lee too). Not only is Bynum a okay player now, he's just getting paid to cause problems (Philly and now on Cavs), then the knees... no sir. If we obtained him like the Cavs did, fine.
It takes me 3hrs to get to Miami and 1hr to get to Orlando... but I *SPIT* on their NBA teams! "Bless God and bless the (Celts)"-Lady GaGa (she said gays but she really meant Celts)

Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #26 on: December 29, 2013, 12:57:19 AM »

Offline diconzo

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 459
  • Tommy Points: 85
Bass/Lee/Crawford for Bynum and a first would clear a lot of cap, and the Cavs have SAC's 2014 protected 1st, which could be a good pick, but likely not in 2014. Cavs also get 3 rotation players for their dead weight.

Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #27 on: December 29, 2013, 12:59:39 AM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
I think attempting to move Wallace, Lee, or even Bass for Bynum, even at the expense of a heavily protected future 1st round pick would be a move worth considering. Especially if it involves Wallace and Lee.

(Wallace+Lee for Bynum+Henry Sims works BTW)

But I think Jeff Green holds more value to us than just a salary dump at this point. Not a lot of viable starting 3's in the league, and Green has shown the ability to at the least be that.

Agreed on all points

Problem being, I'm willing to bet it's going to cost significantly more than a heavily protected first to move Wallace/Lee/Bass. That's $21mill in salary and none of it is expiring this summer.

Yup. That's fantasy talk. I do it myself here and there too. Fact is, it cost something of value for cap space in this league. The trade I'm proposing costs us Jeff Green. It makes us worse in the short (good thing) and gives us a lot of flexibility this upcoming summer.

Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #28 on: December 29, 2013, 01:09:44 AM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34680
  • Tommy Points: 1603
Don't see the point, now if Waiters was in the trade I might be more inclined to do it.
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: Green and Lee for Bynum (trade idea)
« Reply #29 on: December 30, 2013, 11:41:06 AM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
You do realize Cleveland only guaranteed Bynum $6m of that $12m, right?  Next year is fully non-guaranteed.

If the C's we're to trade for him they could cut him immediately and not owe him another dime.  The C's could cut quite a bit of salary from their books for this season and next.  That is usually worth a 1st round pick.
Oh, you want to take Bynum off of their hands, give them a productive player in Green _and_ give them a pick? I hope that's not it, because it's heading down the comical lane.

Also, given that the Cavs are looking to trade Bynum to save salary, I don't see how this can work in a way in which we actually _dump_ salary in this deal.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."