And while free agency isn't guaranteed to get us a franchise player, I think at this point it's probably more realistic than the draft.
I am not sure about this..even when I understand where it came from
Yeah, I'm just not ready to rely on something thats never happened for our team in the past. We didn't become the most successful franchise in the NBA through signing big time free agents in free agency, we got here through smart drafting/trades.
It's easier to do trades if you have plenty of cap space, you don't have to mach salaries. It makes you a more attractive trade partner.
It is easier in a way, but just like in the draft you have the risk of relying on chance, in a trade you have to rely on the chance that theres a team willing to trade its start for our mid value assets.
What's a mid-value asset? Draft picks are draft picks. If someone suggests that we trade someone for a 1st rounder then draft picks are like gold. If someone suggests we could get something good with all of our draft picks they're suddenly not worth much because you don't know how high they'll be. Likewise, we've got a roster full of flawed players without much value, especially compared to young players on other teams (since we don't see enough of them to notice their flaws). When I see posts about how we don't have any useful assets I'm reminded of all the similar posts I saw in 2007 after we lost the lottery.
Well I don't really share the opinion in the first two sentences, I've never said anything like that on this blog. I don't think I undervalue or overvalue our picks, most will be mid round and therefore mid level worth, they aren't in all likelihood low or high picks. Also I am not talking about the nets picks in 3-4 years, no way to know where those will end up.
In 07 we had the 5th overall though, which is a greater asset than anything we have save Rondo.