Author Topic: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)  (Read 9581 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #15 on: December 06, 2013, 04:47:15 PM »

Offline Finkelskyhook

  • NCE
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2892
  • Tommy Points: 285
I'm so annoyed by Celtic fans who don't wanna tank... Talking about getting a big name free agent and we're set... I feel like we're as delusional as Lakers fans but worse because NO FREE AGENTS IN OR ABOUT TO BE IN THEIR PRIME ARE GOING TO THE CELTICS! You keep saying that draft history shows its not kind to the celtics? Well I'm pretty sure free agency history is even worse. Minus the gift from McHale who gave us KG and the #5 pick that landed us Ray.Only out of their prime players come here, last time we won a championship then 5years of injury plagued seasons, I loved the ride but we need a young championship caliber team, and it starts with a young superstar, which we don't have! And we aren't getting a free agent superstar and we aren't trading for one unless they're very unhappy and demand it but then we have to get our roster to even get them, not happening, the smarter and more realistic route is through the draft, sorry we are Far away from another title, we're not just a few pieces, we are so FAR away so for the best future we should tank when it's the perfect time. Fate gave us a golden opportunity to tank and build with rondo and get him with a young superstar but we're blowing it so Ainge needs to make some trades ASAP, and about building a winning culture, since when did becoming the bucks and hawks making the playoffs every year then getting decimated in the first round qualify as a winning culture? No thank you I'll take winning titles as a true winning culture. We're the Celtics, we celebrate titles not winning the division and making the playoffs.  On a side note, please don't say I'm not a true fan, I been a fan for 30 years and do not want to go through another 22 year drought.  There's 3 or 4 possible superstars in this draft, proven or not, there's a possibility they can help change the franchise around. we traded PP and KG for a chance to land a good pick in the draft.

No fan on here wouldn't take a team of Rondo, Wiggins or Parker, Green, Sullinger and whoever we have at center next season?

So I guess let's celebrate their 8-12 record on top of the Atlantic and a 4th seed just to get bounced in the first round of the playoffs, sounds exciting.  Let's see how many real Celtic fans I ticked off.

YO djbilly....A suggestion:

http://www.bobcatsbaseline.com/

They've turned tanking into an art form.   Look where it's gotten them....Go join them.

Most of us in here hate the culture of losing.

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #16 on: December 06, 2013, 05:18:40 PM »

Offline GreenWarrior

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3275
  • Tommy Points: 228
it's easy to have a bad season, but it's real difficult to have a good season.

there is no reason to tank. i'd seriously love to know how long the "pro-tank" group have been fans of this team?

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #17 on: December 06, 2013, 05:40:28 PM »

Offline obnoxiousmime

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2428
  • Tommy Points: 261
As far as our draft history goes... pretty much every Celtic legend was drafted into this organization with a Top 10 pick.  Pretty much every championship we've had was built on first bottoming out for an elite prospect or two.

Yes, people seem to forget that Garnett was an overall no 1 pick and Ray Allen was 5th overall (and took a 5th pick to acquire in a trade, a pick the Celtics earned by being bad). It's true that the linchpin of the Garnett deal was Jefferson, taken with the 15th pick. However, the age limit now forces high schoolers to spend a year in college which makes scouting them a lot easier.

Of course, this is all ignoring the fact that McHale did his old team a favor. He did not aggressively search for the best possible deal and he definitely purposefully avoided dealing him to the Lakers (though Gasol would later work out just fine for them).

Re: Really?
« Reply #18 on: December 06, 2013, 06:03:49 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
I agree with you and understand the need to rant. However, I wish you had brought something new to the conversation if starting a new thread. Also, everybody (I've seen other people do it too) should try to avoid vague subject titles (thanks moderator).

Maybe just to get some extra views i'll start using some misleading, spammy titles:

You'll never believe what Glen Davis looked like in high school

90 percent of NBA fans don't know this free throw secret

Celtics Dancers pose with Red Auerbach portrait for sexy calendar. CLICK HERE FOR PICS

Oh God, please don't turn CB into Buzzfeed.  It's taking over every other part of the Internet.  Not here.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #19 on: December 06, 2013, 06:05:00 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
As far as our draft history goes... pretty much every Celtic legend was drafted into this organization with a Top 10 pick.  Pretty much every championship we've had was built on first bottoming out for an elite prospect or two.

Yes, people seem to forget that Garnett was an overall no 1 pick and Ray Allen was 5th overall (and took a 5th pick to acquire in a trade, a pick the Celtics earned by being bad). It's true that the linchpin of the Garnett deal was Jefferson, taken with the 15th pick. However, the age limit now forces high schoolers to spend a year in college which makes scouting them a lot easier.

Of course, this is all ignoring the fact that McHale did his old team a favor. He did not aggressively search for the best possible deal and he definitely purposefully avoided dealing him to the Lakers (though Gasol would later work out just fine for them).

Garnett was taken 5th in the draft, actually.  I believe Joe Smith was #1 that year.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #20 on: December 06, 2013, 08:27:34 PM »

Offline Jailan34

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 721
  • Tommy Points: 30
it's easy to have a bad season, but it's real difficult to have a good season.

there is no reason to tank. i'd seriously love to know how long the "pro-tank" group have been fans of this team?

Probably about 10 years.

I can't remember the exact year but I was young, and I couldn't get into the Patriots or Sox at the time, I was over my cousins house and Pierce was just lighting it up. First Celtic's game I ever really sat down and watched and got hooked.

I don't think a persons opinion on the best way to rebuild a team has anything, literally anything to do with their fandom or commitment to a team.
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #21 on: December 06, 2013, 08:43:02 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
You know what team is just horrid at tanking? The Miami Heat. They just do not get the concept at all. And look what it's done for them.

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #22 on: December 06, 2013, 08:55:07 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
You know what team is just horrid at tanking? The Miami Heat. They just do not get the concept at all. And look what it's done for them.

They tanked for Dwayne Wade (and to clear space for LeBron + Bosh), and got three championships out of it.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #23 on: December 06, 2013, 09:27:40 PM »

Offline Jailan34

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 721
  • Tommy Points: 30
You know what team is just horrid at tanking? The Miami Heat. They just do not get the concept at all. And look what it's done for them.

They tanked for Dwayne Wade (and to clear space for LeBron + Bosh), and got three championships out of it.

Miami is also an attractive spot for free agents, so couple their tank strategy with their location and that's sadly a recipe for success in this league.
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #24 on: December 06, 2013, 09:54:01 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20133
  • Tommy Points: 1335
Quote
They tanked for Dwayne Wade (and to clear space for LeBron + Bosh), and got three championships out of it.

Stern helped too with the league mandated FTAs and home town refereeing almost every game.

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #25 on: December 06, 2013, 10:06:27 PM »

Offline oldtype

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1677
  • Tommy Points: 143
I give up. Stevens is a genius and the guys try to hard.

We're not going to get a top 3 pick barring an earth-shaking trade or a lottery miracle. Might as well enjoy the season.


Great words from a great man

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #26 on: December 06, 2013, 10:12:43 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
Folks.....Miami's rings have zero to do with tanking.  They were the 5th best tankers the year they got Wade. In 2008 they picked 2nd and got M Beasley.  Their titles are based off a trade for Shaq and free agency.  And not tanking at all.

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #27 on: December 06, 2013, 10:29:45 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Folks.....Miami's rings have zero to do with tanking.  They were the 5th best tankers the year they got Wade. In 2008 they picked 2nd and got M Beasley.  Their titles are based off a trade for Shaq and free agency.  And not tanking at all.


So

1. Luck / Timing -- they got a superstar in Wade despite picking 5th in the draft.  Either they got lucky or they picked the right year to tank.

2. Pat Riley -- did an amazing job convincing Shaq and then LeBron to come to Miami.

3. Great location -- played a significant role in where the aforementioned players chose to take their talents.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #28 on: December 06, 2013, 11:11:42 PM »

Offline BASS_THUMPER

  • Scal's #1 Fan
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11472
  • Tommy Points: 5352
  • Thumper of the BASS!
fans before kg and ray
im sure dont wanna see
this team tank

we went thru years of disappointments
im kinda use to it
also curious of how many
saw the game when the Celtics
beat the Lakers when
Shaq called Pierce

"The Truth"

too much heart here
to give up

long time fans
no tank

brand new fans
tank

not much but my opinion

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #29 on: December 06, 2013, 11:21:08 PM »

Offline angryguy77

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7925
  • Tommy Points: 654
1. Parker could stay at Duke another year.

2. Other teams out there are WAY worse then the Celtics. I'm not sure we could ever be as bad as them. So even if they try we won't get a top pick.


all it takes is one ball.
Back to wanting Joe fired.