Author Topic: Trade Idea Detroit  (Read 15723 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #30 on: December 04, 2013, 09:42:48 PM »

Offline mmmmm

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5308
  • Tommy Points: 862

 Waste of time?? Remember we have Rondo coming back and two first's this year.

 Monroe
 Sullinger
 Jabari Parker, James Young more likely.
 Bradley
 Rondo

 If we somehow got Parker that team would be awesome.

I think that it depends on what Danny wants to do this season.   Going for the trade you propose would make the team worse in the short term (because starting Wallace would be a huge drop-off from Green in our scoring) - but probably not enough to get us deep into the lottery.

Danny would have to do something else to make sure that we actually ended up with enough lottery balls to be certain of at least one of the top-end SFs in that draft.

I think if the plan ends up with James Young as the starting SF in place of Green, I'd rather look for an alternative plan.

Monroe would be an upgrade over our current "starting C" position, but I see a player like Young as a downgrade at SF.  I like the kid, but I just don't think he projects to be at the elite level I think we need to make this transaction pay off.

Now, if the plan ended up with a Wiggins, Parker, Arron Gordon or Vonleh, then I like it a lot more.   But that would require something to change to make sure we slip deeper into the lottery.   And I personally will not root for injury to happen, real or fake.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt?  Incompetent?  Which is worse?  Does it matter?  It sucks.

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #31 on: December 04, 2013, 10:19:54 PM »

Offline Boston Garden Leprechaun

  • Sam Jones
  • **********************
  • Posts: 22096
  • Tommy Points: 1775

 What's the chance's we could land Monroe, are you interested in him.

I am.

As I was listening to the BS Report yesterday, Simmons said that "there are pieces" there.

While defensively flawed, he's a very skilled big man.

My only concern is we might have to overpay him. He while he is steady statistically, has regressed in scoring. Not sure if that's because he gets less touches but nonetheless, his points per game are down. And I probably would not want to pay a guy a max contract averaging 7 rebounds and 16 points. Although I believe he'll get more touches, hence more points with us, as he'll be at worst the number 2 option on offense.

With that in mind, Jeff Green, Brandon Bass and Brooklyn's first rounder for Greg Monroe and Charlie Villanueva is my idea. I don't think Detorit will be swayed for a future first, they'll probably ask for next year's. And I believe that next year's pick is pretty much compensation for Villanueva's expiring deal.

I did this in NBA 2k14. It did not work and they want Avery Bradley along the deal and in return they will include Rodney Stuckey. Not bad.

Hmmnnnnn. Interesting.
LET'S GO CELTICS!

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #32 on: December 04, 2013, 10:57:08 PM »

Offline manl_lui

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6571
  • Tommy Points: 427
I'd trade the entire team (not including Rondo) for Andre Drummond...dude's on a rebound party lately.

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #33 on: December 04, 2013, 11:16:41 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32342
  • Tommy Points: 10099
This is pending Detroit doesn't have the money to keep him. Jeff Green, Brandon Bass and a future first For Charlie V, Kyle Singler, And Greg Monroe. I might talk to you about Bradley as well with out the pick going.

 For Detroit they get a chance to win now in the pathetic East and become the third best team in the conference. They can move Josh Smith to the four spot where he belongs, And lock up there most important young piece in Drummond. 

 Drummond
 Josh Smith - Brandon Bass
 Jeff Green
 Stuckey - Caldwell Pope
 Brandon Jennings - Bynum

 For the Celtics we suddenly have three really good young bigs, In Kelly O, Sully and Monroe I think Monroe could play Center well in the weak East and we know Sully can if he can't hang. We should be able to get a small forward or wing in the Draft.
while I've always really like Monroe, I see him as a natural PF and we already have Sully and KO for that slot.  Sully's looking really good lately too so I'm not as anxious to get Monroe.   Drummond would be a different story only because I see him as a true center.

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #34 on: December 04, 2013, 11:22:27 PM »

Offline pokeKingCurtis

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3733
  • Tommy Points: 280
This is pending Detroit doesn't have the money to keep him. Jeff Green, Brandon Bass and a future first For Charlie V, Kyle Singler, And Greg Monroe. I might talk to you about Bradley as well with out the pick going.

 For Detroit they get a chance to win now in the pathetic East and become the third best team in the conference. They can move Josh Smith to the four spot where he belongs, And lock up there most important young piece in Drummond. 

 Drummond
 Josh Smith - Brandon Bass
 Jeff Green
 Stuckey - Caldwell Pope
 Brandon Jennings - Bynum

 For the Celtics we suddenly have three really good young bigs, In Kelly O, Sully and Monroe I think Monroe could play Center well in the weak East and we know Sully can if he can't hang. We should be able to get a small forward or wing in the Draft.
while I've always really like Monroe, I see him as a natural PF and we already have Sully and KO for that slot.  Sully's looking really good lately too so I'm not as anxious to get Monroe.   Drummond would be a different story only because I see him as a true center.

Yeah. What we need is a true defensive center.

Monroe has size but I heard he doesn't protect the rim.

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #35 on: December 04, 2013, 11:46:00 PM »

Offline gpap

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8224
  • Tommy Points: 417
Anyone think this team would actually be better than what we have now.

 Monroe
 Sully
 Wallace
 Bradley
 Crawford

Absolutely it is. It's not rocket science. You put another quality big on this team, suddenly the Celtics are probably the 4th or 5th best team in East.

I think I've said this before. You don't really need a doctorate in chemistry to put a good basketball team together.

It's all about size, defense and efficient shooting. That's it.

This myth about "small ball" that's spread throughout the league lately is hogwash.

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #36 on: December 04, 2013, 11:47:26 PM »

Offline gpap

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8224
  • Tommy Points: 417
Anyone think this team would actually be better than what we have now.

 Monroe
 Sully
 Wallace
 Bradley
 Crawford
Probably not.

Agreed ,  waste of time......

And why is that?

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #37 on: December 05, 2013, 01:13:19 AM »

Offline Yoki_IsTheName

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11134
  • Tommy Points: 1304
  • I'm a Paul Heyman guy.
I'd trade the entire team (not including Rondo) for Andre Drummond...dude's on a rebound party lately.

Sign me up on this.

Heck, whatever the Nets gave us, I'll gladly give to Detroit for Andre Drummond.

This kid is the real deal.
2019 CStrong Historical Draft 2000s OKC Thunder.
PG: Jrue Holiday / Isaiah Thomas / Larry Hughes
SG: Paul George / Aaron McKie / Bradley Beal
SF: Paul Pierce / Tayshaun Prince / Brian Scalabrine
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge / Shareef Abdur-Raheem / Ben Simmons
C: Jermaine O'neal / Ben Wallace

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #38 on: December 05, 2013, 01:45:28 AM »

Offline Kane3387

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8269
  • Tommy Points: 944
  • Intensity!!!
Anyone think this team would actually be better than what we have now.

 Monroe
 Sully
 Wallace
 Bradley
 Crawford

Absolutely it is. It's not rocket science. You put another quality big on this team, suddenly the Celtics are probably the 4th or 5th best team in East.

I think I've said this before. You don't really need a doctorate in chemistry to put a good basketball team together.

It's all about size, defense and efficient shooting. That's it.

This myth about "small ball" that's spread throughout the league lately is hogwash.

One of your players better be a top five to ten player


KG: "Dude.... What is up with yo shorts?!"

CBD_2016 Cavs Remaining Picks - 14.14

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #39 on: December 05, 2013, 01:08:10 PM »

Offline mmmmm

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5308
  • Tommy Points: 862
Anyone think this team would actually be better than what we have now.

 Monroe
 Sully
 Wallace
 Bradley
 Crawford
Probably not.

Agreed ,  waste of time......

And why is that?

I think the obvious concern would be the huge drop off you'd get at the SF position.

That probably outweighs any gain you get at the C.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt?  Incompetent?  Which is worse?  Does it matter?  It sucks.

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #40 on: December 05, 2013, 01:15:18 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
Anyone think this team would actually be better than what we have now.

 Monroe
 Sully
 Wallace
 Bradley
 Crawford

Absolutely it is. It's not rocket science. You put another quality big on this team, suddenly the Celtics are probably the 4th or 5th best team in East.

I think I've said this before. You don't really need a doctorate in chemistry to put a good basketball team together.

It's all about size, defense and efficient shooting. That's it.

This myth about "small ball" that's spread throughout the league lately is hogwash.

What myth?
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #41 on: December 05, 2013, 04:12:33 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
Anyone think this team would actually be better than what we have now.

 Monroe
 Sully
 Wallace
 Bradley
 Crawford

Absolutely it is. It's not rocket science. You put another quality big on this team, suddenly the Celtics are probably the 4th or 5th best team in East.

I think I've said this before. You don't really need a doctorate in chemistry to put a good basketball team together.

It's all about size, defense and efficient shooting. That's it.

This myth about "small ball" that's spread throughout the league lately is hogwash.

What myth?
The myth that Miami can win it all without a real center. Oh, wait...

The truth is teams play "small ball" because they don't have a decent big and playing small ball is often better than playing a bad big.

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #42 on: December 05, 2013, 04:18:48 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Anyone think this team would actually be better than what we have now.

 Monroe
 Sully
 Wallace
 Bradley
 Crawford
Probably not.

Agreed ,  waste of time......

And why is that?

I think the obvious concern would be the huge drop off you'd get at the SF position.

That probably outweighs any gain you get at the C.


Upgrading the wing wouldn't be super hard.  A Gallinari / Deng type scorer could give you the proper balance.

But Crawford is a sixth man, so you'd need a legitimate starting point guard.

I'd rather have an Afflalo type than Bradley at SG -- I like my wings to have more prototypical size.

If we could somehow get Monroe without giving up Rondo or Sullinger, that's a group you could build a fairly competitive -- though not super elite -- team around.



This is the sort of non-tanking plan that makes some sense.  Exchange the thrill of going for a high lottery pick for the comparable security of acquiring a young player with good size on track to become a second tier star who you can probably extend for reasonable money.

The possible highs -- building a perennial contender around a superstar -- are lowered, but the floor is higher, and you can get back to being competitive much sooner. 


All of that said, it doesn't make sense going that route if you have to give up Rondo to do it.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2013, 04:24:45 PM by PhoSita »
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #43 on: December 06, 2013, 12:31:32 PM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13680
  • Tommy Points: 1029
I thought I would resurrect this thread based on the new rumors that we are "in the mix" for Monroe.

I don't know how good a trade target Monroe is.  He is playing PF but I think he could be a center.  Not sure how he views himself but it seems like he wants to be a PF.  The Celtics need a center, not another PF.

Another problem is he becomes a restricted FA after this season.  Probably not a deal here I don't think.

I would prefer something like Rondo for Drummond + Jennings but Detroit probably doesn't do that, even if a good 1st round pick is involved.  The only way that Drummond would be in the conversation would be if Rondo was also and if Detroit got Rondo, they wouldn't need Jennings.  Not sure there is a deal here either.

If we got Monroe, you could chalk that up to "accumulating assets" even though he doesn't seem to fill a need right now but with him being a RFA, we don't have all that much control over him as an asset.

Re: Trade Idea Detroit
« Reply #44 on: December 06, 2013, 12:51:43 PM »

Offline Endless Paradise

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2867
  • Tommy Points: 182
I like this one.