Making the playoffs would be a disaster as this team has no shot (even with Rondo) of beating Miami or Indiana in a playoff series, which at best would mean a second round exit as those teams are going to be the 1 and 2 seed.
It would be a disaster if all the young players were sitting on the bench and the older guys that aren't likely to be a part of our future were playing all the minutes. It would be quite a disappointment to the people who were counting on the Celts finishing in the bottom 3 but overall it's not a disaster.
For me it's all about what makes reaching the playoffs possible.
Is it because the East is just so weak that a team that would typically win 25-30 games can scrape to 35-40 wins and actually host a playoff series?
Is it because journeyman players whose future may very well be with other teams -- Crawford, Bass, Green, Wallace, Humphries, Lee -- carve out major spots in the rotation and lead the team over opponents that lack experience, talent, or defined roles?
Or is it because the core players on the team play really well and do most of the heavy lifting?
Is it because Rondo comes back and somehow plays better than ever? Is it because Jared Sullinger plays like a guy who's one or two years away from earning an All-Star bid at the tender age of 21 years old? Is it because Avery Bradley finishes the season as one of the Celtics' most reliable and productive off-ball scorers as well as their best on-ball defender? Is it because Kelly Olynyk comes back from his ankle sprain and plays his way into the Rookie of the Year conversation?
Simply making the playoffs doesn't make your team good, or the future pieces on the team more valuable.
Depending on the reasons the Celtics make the playoffs, the team could be in a much better position moving forward than previously anticipated, OR the team could be just as much in need of an infusion of cheap young talent with nothing but a mid-1st round pick and a couple of blowouts at home in the playoffs to show for this season.