I disagree.
I think the Celtics, DA and Stevens are ALL IN on "tanking for Wiggins."
Think about it….
-Stevens doesn't play Humph ( I know this point is debatable because most think Bass is better but I believe BS is not playing Humph cuz doesn't want us to win, IMO.)
-Jeff Green sits entire 4th quarter vs Detroit
-Gerald Wallace doesn't play the 4th quarter yesterday because of a sudden "knee injury."
-Rondo still on the bench, while Westbrook (who injured his knee 3 months after Rondo) is already back.
At first I didn't want to believe it….but now I think it's the case and I've almost sorta resigned myself to it: The Celts are playing "ping pong" this year, instead of basketball.
Here's my feelings: If we get Wiggins, it was worth it.
If we draft another player who doesn't pan out, Ainge will have some 'splanin to do.
I still refuse to be on the tanking bandwagon...I rather see us play hard and lose than the "play hard, then lose the game so we get a higher pick" theory.
If we do get Wiggins, sure, but what if we don't?? Is DA going to make a repeat of 2007, and trade our picks and assets (not name Rondo)??
I am not on the tanking bandwagon either. But after watching the first four games, I've just come to accept the reality of the situation.
I totally agree with you on playing hard and trying to win games (you know, the object of the game.)
I've just come to realize that I think this is the direction the team is going in. Trust me, if I ran the team, we wouldn't even be having these discussions, but I don't.
If I were running the team, I would've brought back Pierce/KG and added another big name FA like Josh Smith, Al Jefferson or Paul Millsap.
We'd be talking about playoffs instead of Wiggins.