I'd like to hear some thoughts on my core of Conley, Redick, George and Anderson.
Good or bad, you'll earn a TP.
Spurs GM doesn't work for TPs. But will swap feedback.
Update your sig
There, your turn 
Humph.
Okay, Everybody loves Paul George. He's long and quick, driven - making meaningful strides every season, and he's now an elite perimeter defender at either wing spot. But he still needs to improve as a shot creator if he's going to carry the load as the primary scoring option on a contender, the Bucks or the Pacers. He can't shoot below 42% again. He's got to maintain his scoring volume, 17.4 points per last season, but get back in to the 44-45% range and, ideally, cut down on his turnovers. His ball handling hurts him there.
If he can't, he may be better suited to a 1A role. There's no shame in that, particularly given his defense. But it's not clear the Bucks have a second scorer on the level of Danny Granger or David West to take up slack. What they do have is four, count them four, knock down shooters. As last season's Warriors team demonstrated, there's not a defensive scheme that can account for four three point threats on the nights they're all on.
Conley has gradually developed into one of the league's top two-way guards. Redick struggled post-trade last season, but let's assume he warms to Milwaukee and returns to form in 13-14. I would've loved to see the Bucks go after another of their own, Ilyasova over Anderson. But Ryan is a shooter who has to be accounted for, careful with the ball - generally Milwaukee is going to make possessions count - and a solid rebounder.
Going forward, the Bucks need a rim protector - team will have elite perimeter defense, but Anderson is going to need help - and a reserve who can be relied on to create his own shot, whether that's off-the-dribble or back-to-the-basket.