Per 36 career numbers game

[Moranis]

Player A - PG

15.7 p, 7.0 a, 3.6 r, 2.1 s, 0.4 b, TS% 53.8, DRTG 105


Player B - SG

12.1 p, 2.5 a, 3.0 r, 1.4 s, 0.4 b, TS% 49.4, DRTG 103


Player C - SF

15.1 p, 1.8 a, 5.8 r, 1.0 s, 0.7 b, TS% 53.2, DRTG 107


Who are these 3 players?

[clover]

Sorry, but this is a silly game.  If it's intended to show that some fourth-string nobody could play two minutes a game and pop some good per-36 numbers, well sure, yeah.

Still, per-36 or 40-minutes numbers are often a useful tool for normalizing results and comparing players who haven't played the exact same number of minutes per game.

[Roy H.]

Pretty sure Player C is Jeff Green.

I'm going to guess that B is Avery Bradley.

No idea on Player A.  It's not Rondo or Terry.  Mike Conley? Jrue Holiday?

[Fafnir]

Yeah Roy has the SG/SF guesses same as mine, I assume that the PG is your current PG who we should trade Rondo for along with dumping salary?

[Moranis]

Pretty sure Player C is Jeff Green.

I'm going to guess that B is Avery Bradley.

No idea on Player A.  It's not Rondo or Terry.  Mike Conley? Jrue Holiday?

Those are correct.  A is none of those guys.

[Moranis]

Yeah Roy has the SG/SF guesses same as mine, I assume that the PG is your current PG who we should trade Rondo for along with dumping salary?

Not really.  I just thought it was interesting to look at.

[Moranis]

Sorry, but this is a silly game.  If it's intended to show that some fourth-string nobody could play two minutes a game and pop some good per-36 numbers, well sure, yeah.

Still, per-36 or 40-minutes numbers are often a useful tool for normalizing results and comparing players who haven't played the exact same number of minutes per game.

none of those players play 2 minutes a game.  As Roy pointed out the last two are Bradley and Green.  No one has guessed the first yet.

[Fafnir]

Sorry, but this is a silly game.  If it's intended to show that some fourth-string nobody could play two minutes a game and pop some good per-36 numbers, well sure, yeah.

Still, per-36 or 40-minutes numbers are often a useful tool for normalizing results and comparing players who haven't played the exact same number of minutes per game.

none of those players play 2 minutes a game.  As Roy pointed out the last two are Bradley and Green.  No one has guessed the first yet.

Kemba Walker? I remember him having similar numbers to Holiday in the second half from a tweet from some NBA analyst.

I don't remember if he did anything as a rookie though.

Edit: Nope, should have known from his non-awful DRating 111 for Kemba ouch.

[Interceptor]

Pretty sure the mystery man is Lin.

[Moranis]

Sorry, but this is a silly game.  If it's intended to show that some fourth-string nobody could play two minutes a game and pop some good per-36 numbers, well sure, yeah.

Still, per-36 or 40-minutes numbers are often a useful tool for normalizing results and comparing players who haven't played the exact same number of minutes per game.

none of those players play 2 minutes a game.  As Roy pointed out the last two are Bradley and Green.  No one has guessed the first yet.

Kemba Walker? I remember him having similar numbers to Holiday in the second half from a tweet from some NBA analyst.

I don't remember if he did anything as a rookie though.

Edit: Nope, should have known from his non-awful DRating 111 for Kemba ouch.

Walker's numbers are in that range though he is not near the passer, defender, nor as efficient.

[kozlodoev]

Could be a wide spectrum of PGs. Jeff Teague, perhaps. Or Knight.

[Celtics18]

Just give us the darned answer, please.

[Moranis]

Pretty sure the mystery man is Lin.

Yep.  Player A is Jeremy Lin.

The purpose of this thread was to bring a bit of reality to C-Blog.  I hear all of this talk about how Green and Bradley are going to be stars and how awful Lin is.  Yet when you look at their numbers, the one player you would project most highly is in fact Lin. 

[kozlodoev]

Pretty sure the mystery man is Lin.

Yep.  Player A is Jeremy Lin.

The purpose of this thread was to bring a bit of reality to C-Blog.  I hear all of this talk about how Green and Bradley are going to be stars and how awful Lin is.  Yet when you look at their numbers, the one player you would project most highly is in fact Lin.

Right, and as any exercise without context, this is pretty pointless. Lin put his numbers by being the lead guard on a couple of pretty horrible teams. Green did so playing out of position behind Durant and Westbrook.

And I don't think anyone should or will project Bradley to be as productive as the other two.

[Interceptor]

The purpose of this thread was to bring a bit of reality to C-Blog.  I hear all of this talk about how Green and Bradley are going to be stars and how awful Lin is.  Yet when you look at their numbers, the one player you would project most highly is in fact Lin.

This list also serves as a handy "defend by forcing these guys to the left" crib sheet.