Are we still really debating whether or not this team would be better with Pierce and KG???
I don't see anyone in the last few posts that has alluded to anything having to do with this.
The only assertions that have been made is to contest the opinion that this team keeping Pierce and KG wouldn't be able to compete any longer, and using our last playoffs performance as the basis for that assertion.
I´m not using the last playoffs as the basis for that assertion. I called exactly this, and I called it years in advance. Decline doesn´t happen over night, the writing was on the wall for years already.
If I recall correctly, you said we would make the finals even after Rondo went down. I think your ability to project this team´s success is questionable, at best.
I think you still have not analyzed our ECF run in 2012 correctly. We were extremely lucky.
We had absolutely no business playing in that ECF on quality alone. Key players of our opponents went down at just the right time, and our guys showed the fighting spirit they were known for their whole career, but in the end, the clearly superior team won.
By all accounts, even the Celtics brass seems to share this opinion nowadays, or why else would they trade KG and Pierce after "one bad playoff series", as you insist?
You can accuse fans on the internet of being fickle and get away with it, but you can´t say the same about the Celtics´ FO without looking delusional, in my opinion.