I wrote a Fanpost detailing the merits I saw in the trade (here:
http://www.celticsblog.com/2013/6/28/4473528/in-defense-of-the-brooklyn-boston-trade), so if you want to read a longer analysis, you can check that out. But here's the summary:
1. The Celtics get younger.We get a lot of younger players in exchange for three veterans who are seriously on the decline. With all those draft picks and ex-Nets players, the Cs' can expect to make more moves to improve.
Cold as it may sound, I'd also rather give KG and Pierce away in exchange for
something instead of letting them retire with nothing but fond memories replacing them.
2. KG & Pierce deserve it.Brooklyn offers the duo a better chance at repeating in the next couple of years. Personally, I'd rather see them retire as champions than waste their years and talent away on a rebuilding Celtics team.
The best part is they'll still be doing their ring-hunting together. If they're going to retire after this one season, then they're going to be right with each other.
3. Rondo takes this chance to step up and become a leader.Next season, Rondo becomes the only member left from the '08 championship squad. No Doc Rivers around either. This is a huge gamble on our PG, since he can take this opportunity to either rise to the challenge or run away from it.
So either he becomes a genuine leader once he's left on his own, or he continues his immature antics, now that all his role models have left the locker room.
4. Boston takes this chance to rebuild.With the trade, the Celtics get younger. Younger teams have no other way to go but up (unless you're Charlotte or Toronto, haha). This trade was meant to benefit us in the long run, not like Brooklyn, who want to solve their ringless problem quickly.
Another upside with the veterans' absence is that the young guys can now really rebuild and re-create an identity of their own. Boston can now reinvent itself without having the old guys' influence holding them back.
5. We get rid of Jason Terry.Come on now, do I really have to elaborate on this one?
All in all, I'm a fan of the trade. The only negative things I see here are that: 1) sentimentally speaking, it really is too hard to see them go; and 2) maybe Danny could have waited for better offers.
But if we want to win, rebuilding's the way to go. We barely breezed through the playoffs, even with Pierce and Garnett on the roster. But because we didn't have Rondo and lot of the young guys, the Knicks took care of us in six. What happens then if we keep the same core this time? Will we even make the playoffs if we did?
Another thing is nobody else was crazy enough to give us this many assets in exchange for two coveted veterans and Jason Terry. Had Danny waited for better offers, Brooklyn's offer might have expired, leaving us with nothing again.
All I'm saying is, give the trade a chance. For all we know, the young guys could develop into something fierce over the next few years, while Brooklyn won't be happy for very long. Let the Nets have their fun first. We'll see who'll have the advantage once our new-look team is ready.